Sentences with phrase «based policies on»

With the increasing needs of science - based policies on climate change adaptation, strengthening the communication at the science — policy interface becomes critical.
The people pegging sensible, reality - based policies on celebrities are the opponents of sensible, reality - based policies, not their advocates.
Clinton never based his policies on religious ideology.
Hitler based his policies on «eugenics» and science and evolution, which led him to his attempts to «build a better man».
The Fed will only have itself to blame when Congress strips them of independence and forces rules - based policy on them.
Government should base its policies on facts, not make up facts based on policy.
Individual Mormons should be treated with respect, but if a Mormon bishop wants to be president and bases his policies on his Mormon beliefs, those beliefs should be investigated.
What is sad is that you expect your nation's leader to base policy on a fairy tale concocted by the ancients trying to understand their place in the universe.
These are not likely to base policy on «the suffering love of Christ.»
From the seventeenth century, in reaction to these wars of religion, some politicians began to ignore moral constraints and to base their policies on reasons of state», which allowed a nation to deviate from the ethical norms required of the individual.
We finally have a justice secretary basing policy on evidence.
This is in marked contrast to Grayling, who based policy on dogma and in fact went out of his way to exclude experts from the decision - making process.
Given the central place of oil - based energy in the modern world, it is critically important that governments should base their policies on realistic depletion profiles, despite ambiguous definitions and lax reporting practices.
Barroso «is keen to base policy on scientific evidence, which is a great decision.
«He has written extensively and spoken widely to policy, business and scientific audiences on the need for basing policy on strong science and scientific assessment, and about the need to understand the linkages between science, the environment, economics and policy on major global environmental issues.
Since few results on anything represent the absolute «truth» and few real scientists would say «only these results are the 100 % true ones» I suspect that everyone in any position of responsibility has to be selective to a certain degree in deciding which results to base policy on.
The task force based this policy on 40 years of studies of both circumcised and uncircumcised boys, and it concluded the following:
But basing our policy on the assumption that this is the way things will go is crazy, IMHO.
I suppose that if all uncertainties are resolved in the direction of lower risk, we just might get away with BAU for the next few decades without a complete disaster... But basing our policy on the assumption that this is the way things will go is crazy»
I would need to see a radical change happen before I would believe it to be possible, and I don't see how we can base policy on something we've never seen happen.
Walter Manny, Just what should we base policy on if not the insights we gain from sound modeling?
In the mean time, mind if we get on with basing policy on established science.
Because there are only two options: We can base the policy on the science or we can go against the science.
«It's time to base our policies on science and the safety of our communities, not on someone's bottom - line.»
Zachary: That's why predicting so far in the future is a fools errand and we should never base policy on it.
«Itâ $ ™ s time to base our policies on science and the safety of our communities, not on someoneâ $ ™ s bottom - line.»
And now for the big question: Do we have any reason to think or hope that the new Trump administration can penetrate through the barrage of fake news coming out of these government agencies and start basing policy on real information?
The political will to base policy on science over special interests is growing, and the tipping point is fast approaching.
I can't wait to remind the Trump - controlled state science apparatus of Lamar Smith's words this morning: We need to base policy on science, not science fiction.
After all, how can you base policy on a model that is outperformed by something much simpler based on very different sensitivities.
So IPCC consensus remains the best bet for the policy sector to base policy on, even though it may be somewhat overconfident.
The fact that the models are so poor at reflecting the real world, why believe any projection from them never mind base policy on their output!
If the models are not right then we are basing policy on erroneous data.
Dutch Environment Minister Jacqueline Cramer has ordered a thorough investigation into the quality of the climate reports which she uses to base her policies on.
And finally I mentioned that despite IPCC 2007 was 50 years behind the 2012 melting, the European Commission and its climate policy commissioner was basing its policy on IPCC 2007.
We should not base policy on 33 years of data because that sample compared to the history of the earths climate (Which we can only really guess at) is statistically insignificant.
You can't base policy on them.»
The results of the current climate models which are based on the greenhouse effect theory are therefore invalid, and are inappropriate for basing policy on.
That is, some of the text reads as if a policy - maker is free to choose whether to base policy on economic or ethical and justice considerations, choosing between these two ways of evaluation is simply an option.
Second, the «warming» from CO2 — and yes, CO2 is a «greenhouse gas» — has been much less than predicted by the climate models Obama bases his policies on.
The bottom line is that Rob Starkey is right — basing policy on current models is stupid.
I would be more than happy to base policy on the following.
As an alternative, the researchers propose that countries base their policies on a new kind of index: How much current global warming is attributable to human activity.
In the UK, for example we could send it to our MPs and get questions asked in parliament about why our Government still believes in the IPCC and why it should base its policies on the IPCC reports.
Obama and other world leaders are basing their policies on the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
If the models used to base policy on are wrong, then they are just wrong, and no further conclusion can be safely drawn.
Not suitable for basing policy on.
WHY THESE FINDINGS MATTER Governments around the world need to base their policies on impeccable research - not a report that relies on 5,587 instances of grey literature to make its case.
The IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was created by governments to they could have information to base policy on.
It can be purchased with the base policy on inception or on the policy anniversary, provided that the base policy is in the force and all the premiums are duly paid.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z