Not exact matches
In chapter 20, «Climate of Fear,» Moore has a very up to date, science -
based, 43 page summary of the
skeptic position on AGW, with around 130 footnotes, often to internet -
based sources.
Only very few
skeptics are active
based on standard scientific incentives, and the pro AGW scientists take activist
positions to influence policies.
The «story arc» where they realize that their
positions are off -
base and change them in response to the present state of the evidence (in other words, when they start behaving like
skeptics) is sadly all too rare an occurrence.
This abysmal failure to show us all absolute evidence of illicit money exchanged for fabricated, demonstratively false science papers / assessments is the proverbial «mathematical certainty «that dooms the accusation, and places the whole idea of man - caused global warming in peril of sinking if its promoters can not defend their
position against science -
based criticism from
skeptic scientists.
And I think it is the
basis for something of a reasonable criticism from «
skeptics» of the «realist»
position in the climate wars.