If Congressional Democrats aren't lobbying President Barack Obama and EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy to use the full legal authority of the Executive Branch in regulating America's greenhouse gas emissions, then those Democrats aren't being honest in claiming that they truly and sincerely want to address
the basic causes of climate change.
Not exact matches
Indeed, a recent Pew poll shows that there is a substantial and growing amount
of public disagreement about
basic scientific facts, including human evolution, the safety
of vaccines and whether or not human -
caused climate change is real and happening.
We then exposed participants to a number
of different experimental treatments that all contained the same
basic message, that «97 %
of climate scientists have concluded that human -
caused climate change is happening.»
These nuances may be lost in a political environment where the
basics of human -
caused climate change trigger opposition.
Whilst this is the
basic cause of the cyclical nature
of the ice age and the warmer inter ice age
climate of the earth in the last few million years at least, there are natural «feedbacks» in the earth which then exaggerate this climatic
change.
The leaders
of the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change review of the basic science on climate change and its causes have weighed in with a strong defense both of their findings and the individual scientists involved in the hacked e-mail messages and
Climate Change review of the basic science on climate change and its causes have weighed in with a strong defense both of their findings and the individual scientists involved in the hacked e-mail messages and
Change review
of the
basic science on
climate change and its causes have weighed in with a strong defense both of their findings and the individual scientists involved in the hacked e-mail messages and
climate change and its causes have weighed in with a strong defense both of their findings and the individual scientists involved in the hacked e-mail messages and
change and its
causes have weighed in with a strong defense both
of their findings and the individual scientists involved in the hacked e-mail messages and files.
The lines
of evidence and analysis supporting the mainstream position on
climate change are diverse and robust — embracing a huge body
of direct measurements by a variety
of methods in a wealth
of locations on the Earth's surface and from space, solid understanding
of the
basic physics governing how energy flow in the atmosphere interacts with greenhouse gases, insights derived from the reconstruction
of causes and consequences
of millions
of years
of natural climatic variations, and the results
of computer models that are increasingly capable
of reproducing the main features
of Earth's
climate with and without human influences.
Here's Lovell on the
basics of the geological argument for the power
of carbon dioxide to
cause enduring
changes in
climate and the environment:
People who do not accept human -
caused climate change generally believe that a large fraction
of scientists disagree with the
basic notion
of man - made warming.
One next needs to integrate the finding into a more complete
climate change description which follows the observations from beginning to end as they alternately
cause warming or cooling
of the
climate system around the
basic level
of energy content determined by mass, gravity and ToA insolation.
The society has officially taken a position many
of us AMS members do not agree with... Instead
of organizing meetings with free and open debates on the
basic physics and the likelihood
of AGW induced
climate changes, the leaders
of the society... have chosen to fully trust the
climate models and deliberately avoid open debate and discussion... My interaction (over the years) with a broad segment
of AMS members... have indicated that a majority
of them do not agree that humans are the primary
cause of global warming.»
«Besides being a good summary
of the massive controversy behind the scenes in the
climate science research community about the causes of the past century's modest warming, Climate Change Reconsidered could make a good text book for university (and advanced senior high school classes) climate change courses as well since they do an easily understood and accurate review of the related basic science at the beginning of each of the topic - specific chapters.
climate science research community about the
causes of the past century's modest warming,
Climate Change Reconsidered could make a good text book for university (and advanced senior high school classes) climate change courses as well since they do an easily understood and accurate review of the related basic science at the beginning of each of the topic - specific chapters.
Climate Change Reconsidered could make a good text book for university (and advanced senior high school classes) climate change courses as well since they do an easily understood and accurate review of the related basic science at the beginning of each of the topic - specific chapters.&
Change Reconsidered could make a good text book for university (and advanced senior high school classes)
climate change courses as well since they do an easily understood and accurate review of the related basic science at the beginning of each of the topic - specific chapters.
climate change courses as well since they do an easily understood and accurate review of the related basic science at the beginning of each of the topic - specific chapters.&
change courses as well since they do an easily understood and accurate review
of the related
basic science at the beginning
of each
of the topic - specific chapters.»
Thirty years ago, when the
basic understanding
of global
climate change was being formulated, there was no real
cause for the use
of vitriolic dialog in
climate science.
This is so because in addition to the theological reasons given by Pope Francis recently: (a) it is a problem mostly
caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels
of greenhouse gases (ghg) in one part
of the world who are harming or threatening tens
of millions
of living people and countless numbers
of future generations throughout the world who include some
of the world's poorest people who have done little to
cause the problem, (b) the harms to many
of the world's most vulnerable victims
of climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from
climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those
causing the problem will see that justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share
of safe global emissions, and, (e)
climate change is preventing some people from enjoying the most
basic human rights including rights to life and security among others.
This is so because: (a) it is a problem mostly
caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels
of greenhouse gases (ghg) in one part
of the world who are harming or threatening tens
of millions
of living people and countless numbers
of future generations throughout the world who include some
of the world's poorest people who have done little to
cause the problem, (b) the harms to many
of the world's most vulnerable victims
of climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from
climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those
causing the problem will see that justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share
of safe global emissions, and, (e)
climate change is preventing some people from enjoying the most
basic human rights including rights to life and security among others.
All
of these methods converge on the same
basic conclusion: at least 97 %
of climate scientists have concluded that human -
caused climate change is happening [6].
At the same time, the number
of moderate Republicans that accept humans are
causing climate change has shown a pretty notable uptick in the past year, so maybe we're not totally doomed to a lifetime
of squabbling over
basic science.
Regardless
of the unbounded ethical duties derived from imperfect obligations, if the
climate change causing activities
of some people are violating the human rights
of others by interfering with life, health, or
basic security, among other things, protected by human rights, a case can be made that those who can make reductions in GHG emissions targets that are nevertheless interfering with the rights
of others should take steps to prevent human rights violations even if they are complying with just allocations.
These two
basic conclusions, that the world is warming and that humanity is the primary
cause, are well documented in the reports
of the Nobel prize - winning Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change.
Basic point being, these are people collectively operate in the realm
of «
climate change sociology» under the unsupportable premise that man -
caused global warming is settled science, thus it is up to them to explain to the rest
of us what's wrong with the mindset
of skeptic
climate scientists....
To understand why «this current» global warming is human
caused and not natural cycle, one needs to get an idea
of what the natural cycle is and what are the
basic mechanisms that
cause climate change in the natural cycle.
Scientists know that recent
climate change is largely
caused by human activities from an understanding
of basic physics, comparing observations with models, and fingerprinting the detailed patterns
of climate change caused by different human and natural influences.
There is rapidly growing evidence from a combination
of basic climate science, models, and real - world observations that human -
caused climate change has influenced and worsened the current drought.
Q: The Chinese chief negotiator on
climate change, Xie Zhenhua, Vice Chairman
of the National Development and Reform Commission, has literally thrown the baby and the bath water and the IPCC out, when he said after the
BASIC meeting to please look at natural cyclic events as one
of the aspects which could be
causing climate change.
One season's weather could either speed up or slightly slow down the loss
of Arctic sea ice this year, but it will not
change the
climate trend and the
basic causes of warming.
Information alone is not enough to choose appropriate policies and strategies to limit some
climate changes and prepare society for
changes that are already well under way, but without understanding the
basic causes and effects
of climate change, we will be unable to make informed decisions that will affect generations to come.
The case appears to be similar with some
of the
basics of the theory
of human -
caused climate change, too —
basics, such as the radiative characteristics
of CO2 and other «greenhouse» gases, or the importance
of the greenhouse effect in the natural regulation
of our planetary temperature, are firmly established.
In the mainstream peer - reviewed, juried world - wide science literature since 1824, the
basics of human -
caused climate change are as strong as five years ago.
However, what is not clear in the report is that the report does NOT undermine the integrity or the
basic message
of climate change: that it is happening and our GHG emissions are the primary
cause.
Skeptics and Smog — The
basic principles
of human -
caused climate change have been known for more than a century and are based on physics 101, chemistry 101 and economics 101.