The problem is not that many Americans have come to reject the concept of
the basic dignity of all people; it is that they are increasingly losing faith in democratic institutions and the rule of law.
Not exact matches
Theologies were written to suggest that non-white
people did not bear the image
of God like white
people did and were therefore not worthy
of basic human
dignity.
If the pro-life side truly wins a
basic point, for example, by persuading
people of the
dignity of every human
person» then that principle will begin to inform other life issues.
A conservative pundit criticizes the statement because it also affirms that «the Catholic Church teaches emphatically that individuals and society must respect the
basic human
dignity of all
persons, including those with a homosexual orientation.»
On quite a different note than the Malaysian prime minister, South Korean President Kim Dae Jung has written that the Universal Declaration «reflects
basic respect for the
dignity of people, and Asian nations should take the lead in implementing it.»
Likewise, Section 4
of the report Poverty and Development says that «the present articulation
of human rights is a secular formation
of the spiritual notion
of the
dignity inherent to each
person, and thus has its grounding in the
basic principles
of all religions.»
A
person persistently deprived
of basic material needs and political rights is also a
person deprived
of much
of his or her soul - self respect,
dignity and will.
When
people lose their respect for others, and stop believing that all
people have
basic human
dignity and value, the freedom
of speech can become a curse.
Persons of faith should be deeply concerned about the current surveillance flap not because privacy is an absolute end in itself but rather because it points to and safeguards something else even more
basic and fundamental, namely, human
dignity.
The British Institute
of Human Rights (BIHR) has led in this call and all the signatories to the letter to David Cameron and Nick Clegg are united around a fundamental belief in the equal
dignity of all
people and the legal protection
of basic human rights.
But what could be more hateful than denying one group
of people the same
basic human rights
dignities that we allow everyone else?
Category: Africa, Asia, Central America, Child Health, Combat HIV / AIDS, End Poverty and Hunger, English, Environmental Sustainability, Europe, Gender Equality, Global Partnership, Maternal Health, Middle East, Millennium Development Goals, NGO, North America, Oceania, Private Institution, Public Institution, Refugee and displaced, South America, Universal Education, Voluntary Association, Your experiences, Your ideas · Tags: Afghanistan, Ban Ki - moon, Burkina Faso, Chad, children, civic engagement, conflict areas, conflict situations, curriculum frameworks,
dignity, Educate a Child, Education, Education First, Education for All Global Monitoring Report, education programme, education systems, Enhancement for Literacy, Forest Whitaker, fragile states, Gaza, gender equity, girls, global citizenship, global citizenship education, global development agenda, global initiative, government, Her Highness Sheikha Moza bint Nasser, hidden crisis, Human Rights, Human Rights Education, humanitarian aid, inequalities, international community, Iraq, Irina Bokova, Jordan, Lebanon, life skills, Literacy Initiative for Empowerment, Millennium Development Goals, new teachers, non-formal peace education, non-violence, peace, Peacebuilding, PeaceEarth Foundation, primary education, primary schools, promoting peace, Qatar, refugees, School Day
of Non-violence and Peace, secondary education, special education, Sub-Saharan Africa, Sudan, sustainable development, Syrian refugees, UN, UNESCO, UNESCO Director - General, UNESCO Goodwill Ambassador, UNESCO Special Envoy for
Basic and Higher Education, United Nations, United Nations Secretary - General, UNRWA, violence, vulnerable groups, West Bank, woman empowerment, young
people, Youth Peacemaker Network
Within this perspective, Paul Weis describes refugees as «a vessel on the open sea, not sailing under any flag ’23 while Hannah Arendt observed that refugees are without rights because each nation - state has primary obligation to protect the rights, interests and expectations
of its own citizens first, no matter where they are.24 However, both international and national refugee laws are adopted with the sole aim to ensure entitlement
of the
basic rights, proclaimed under a range
of human rights conventions.25 Under these conventions, respect for human
dignity of each and every human
person is underlined as a foundation to freedom, justice and peace.
The important factors
of safety, technology and economics, as well as
basic dignity, must be considered in determining the extent to which disabled
persons can be accommodated.
COPOH will submit that the right to choose who will assist oneself in dressing, bathing and toileting («
basic dignity») and the right to privacy in relation to personal
dignity is a
basic right accorded to all human beings and protected as part
of «security
of the
person» under s. 7
of the Charter.
The quintessential concern
of the human rights enterprise is to raise to a status
of dignity and equality each powerless
person —
persons who for reasons such as law, poverty, race, religion or gender are unable to achieve
dignity, fairness,
basic equality and justice...
It has cast doubts on the integrity
of many individuals, and ultimately has denied Indigenous
people basic human
dignity and decency.
Shelter House provides
basic needs,
dignity and comfort to
people living in poverty and stimulates action to address the root causes
of homelessness.