In the new version of «Northwest Coal Exports» we set out
the basic facts of the case, examining currrent North American coal exports, what the new proposals involve, and what the pollution consequences might be.
Before I turn to the questions I want to say something about
the basic facts of the case which have become entirely lost in the furore about «gags», superinjunctions and parliamentary privilege.
The basic facts of the case are in little doubt.
Not exact matches
In this work, Thurman made the compelling
case that, despite Christianity's historical use by dominant powers to affirm their dominance, «the
basic fact is that Christianity as it was born in the mind
of this Jewish teacher and thinker appears as a technique
of survival for the oppressed.»
Is it not the
case in
fact that the Maoists are right in insisting on changing the
basic material conditions
of life before attempting the subtler cultivation
of character through interpersonal rhythms and that the traditional approaches
of both Confucianism and Taoism were counterrevolutionary?
It is in any
case a
fact that Israel's creation faith — certainly a
basic element
of the structure
of Yahwism from early times — receives scant specific mention (apart from the J story
of Gen. 2:4 b ff.)
«The legal strategy that we decided was optimum from our point
of view was to file the civil suit yesterday, lay out the entire
case in a civil suit, seek certain remedies in the civil suit and commence a criminal investigation today on the same
basic underlying
facts and proceed with the criminal investigation jointly with our federal counterparts.»
«The scope
of the epidemic and the
fact that
cases were imported into the United States and Europe reinforces the importance
of these viruses as pathogens and public health threats, and drives home for us the idea that we need to be looking really seriously at ways we can translate our
basic science into potential therapeutics.
So inevitable are these conclusions, in
fact, that I just gave up and accepted the ending, which sidesteps a first - glance
case of double jeopardy with such vague dialogue, recited in such a bland tone
of sotto voce, that I only got the
basic gist
of how we got from Point A to Point B. With Point B such a shrug - worthy certainty, I wasn't nearly confused enough to care besides.
Methe et al (2012) conducted a meta - analysis
of interventions for
basic math in single -
case research and reported «we found interventions involving practice under speeded conditions and a carefully controlled instructional sequence produced the strongest effects,» echoing results from Powell et al (2009) who reported that timed practice (vs. untimed) was crucial to an intervention for struggling 3rd - graders to learn math
facts, and Fuchs et al. (2013) reporting similar results for 1st graders..
While the
case is concluded the there are a number
of troubling
facts listed in the article from the vast miss treatment
of Ryan by the Canadian border patrol denying him
basic rights that he was entitled to the
fact that he was banned from using a computer outside.
The
basic facts of Brennan's
case fail to convey the experiences
of Maryland consumers who entrusted his firm, and others like it, to settle their debts and provide them with financial relief.»
We expressed some concern over the
fact that we were being charged extra fro what seems like
basic multiplayer, but also noted that the RE5 disc is so crammed full
of content anyway that, in this
case, it wasn't that big a deal.
But it seems to me that he's assuming that in America, at least, policy about this can simply be set a bit more like the Soviets would have set it, via authoritarian measures taken by the few, and a bit less like what seems to me to be the only option for progress: the hard slog
of civic debate, inherently involving the citizenry, even in
cases when most citizens already agree on the
basic facts.
And none
of the men — not Levitt, not Dubner, not Myhrvold, and not Wood — seem to realize that they're making statements that are counter to the best available science and, in many
cases, could have been detected as wrong with some simple and
basic fact checking.
Basic IRAC structure (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion)-- the hallmark
of legal writing organization — represents a deductive syllogistic process.205 But written legal analysis involves induction as well.206 Virtually no analysis is complete without incorporating analogical reasoning by comparing the
facts of one's
case to precedent.
Like the three reports discussed above, and, in
fact, drawing heavily on those reports, the curricular change literature generally takes the position that the
case - dialogue method
of pedagogy does not sufficiently prepare law students to become practicing lawyers.74 While students learn
basic case analysis skills through this method, they are usually not explicitly taught how to integrate those skills into a larger set
of lawyering skills, in particular those identified as fundamental in the MacCrate Report.75 Further, while reading and analyzing
cases, the focus
of most law school classes, are important lawyering skills, they represent only a small portion
of what lawyers actually do.76 Consequently, these commentators advocate for teaching legal skills as they are used in their real - world context, not merely as abstract ideas, and for integrating theoretical analysis and practical skills.77
In Illinois, the
basic test is whether the restrictive covenant in an employment contract is reasonably necessary to protect the employer from improper or unfair competition, depending on the
facts of each
case.
The SRL usually is not versed in legalese and when they tell the
facts or make argument using everyday language that says the exact same thing the legalese says the judges pretend not to understand (in some
cases they actually may not understand, I find them often very unaware
of basic legal principles) so they take the easy and safest way out by saying the one word that works for them - dismissed.
A
basic principle
of the law whereby once a decision (a precedent) on a certain set
of facts has been made, another Court
of the same rank or lower, must apply that decision in
cases presenting the same set
of facts.
But what we can do is take a look at the
basic requirements for winning an online defamation lawsuit in the United States, in relation to the
facts of this Yelp reputation
case.
24 (2) analysis, society's interest in the adjudication
of each
case on its merits is tempered by the
fact that arresting a person where the officer fails to recall even the most
basic procedural requirements
of the ASD would bring the administration
of justice into disrepute.
61 Accordingly, that concept must be interpreted as covering all assistance introduced by the public authorities, whether at national, regional or local level, that can be claimed by an individual who does not have resources sufficient to meet his own
basic needs and the needs
of his family and who, by reason
of that
fact, may become a burden on the public finances
of the host Member State during his period
of residence which could have consequences for the overall level
of assistance which may be granted by that State (see, to that effect, Bidar, paragraph 56; Eind, paragraph 29; and Förster, paragraph 48; see also, by analogy,
Case C ‑ 578 / 08 Chakroun [2010] ECR I ‑ 1839, paragraph 46, and Kamberaj, paragraph 91).
We prepared a summary
of the
basic principles in the leading high - asset high - income
cases, highlighting useful points for negotiation, and prepared bullet point digests
of similar
fact cases which were easy to review and compare.
Consider, for example, a
case where the Crown proves the
basic facts required for by s. 753 (1.1) beyond a reasonable doubt, and where the accused, in response, presented evidence that did not disprove on a balance
of probabilities that the required criteria
of a dangerous offender finding under s. 753 (1) were met.
Generally, a divorce has a
basic range
of fees and costs which are based upon many factors such as the legal issues to be resolved, the complexity
of the
facts and legal issues
of the
case, the other party's attorney, the judge assigned to the
case, the willingness
of the parties to be reasonable with each other, the emotions
of the parties, the need for revenge or retribution
of one or both parties, as well as countless other intangible factors.
I found that the parallels with the
basic facts of what happened in the Folbigg
case are incredible, except for the different legal outcomes.