Sentences with phrase «basic facts wrong»

Several climate scientists reviewed Roberts» speech, and explained the Senator had got several basic facts wrong.

Ed Balls has refused to apologise for his confused response to the autumn statement yesterday, after the shadow chancellor got basic facts wrong in his response to George Osborne.

Not exact matches

If you have even that very basic simple fact wrong, it indicates you are basing a portion of your argument on false information.

You have a very basic fact of Catholicism wrong.

If, nevertheless, historically endless disputes and radical disagreements over the interpretation of the doctrine have in fact arisen, this is one piece of evidence that there is probably something wrong, perhaps self - contradictory, in the basic idea.

In fact, large numbers of Protestants agreed with strict secularists that even Horace Mann's ideal of training in basic Christian beliefs in nonsectarian fashion was wrong.

I've written articles on the season so far and tried to give some insight into what has gone wrong, but either way it leaves us with some basic facts.

This basic fact makes it difficult for researchers to discern the underlying mechanism of the disease: «It's very difficult to figure out what's wrong, because the bone marrow is nearly empty of these cells,» said Bessler, the director of CHOP's Pediatric and Adult Comprehensive Bone Marrow Failure Center.

A basic rule to follow is to avoid overtly physical compliments in your online dating first message as this can send the wrong signal — in fact, our Kiwi members voted sexual innuendo as one of their biggest online dating no - nos!

A basic rule to follow is to avoid overtly physical compliments in your online dating first message as this can send the wrong signal — in fact, our members voted sexual innuendo as one of their biggest online dating no - nos!

On one hand, Isle of Dogs appears to be a much darker entry in Anderson's filmography, but at its core, its characters are especially human (despite the fact that they're dogs), acting on their most basic core principles and instincts - like righting wrongs and helping a young boy find his dog.

The slightly patronizing writing style, the drastic simplifying of a very complex subject, the theme of «armchair genius uses basic facts to prove a major field of science wrong» — all just like any pseudo-scientific creationist tract.

If Nurse understood the basic facts of The Science of climate change, he would have known that was wrong.

And none of the men — not Levitt, not Dubner, not Myhrvold, and not Wood — seem to realize that they're making statements that are counter to the best available science and, in many cases, could have been detected as wrong with some simple and basic fact checking.

As a general response I would say that while we are all entitled to our own opinions, we are not entitled to our own facts and you have many very basic things just plain wrong.

In my opinion its a wrong format, first and foremost facts must be agreed upon by the dialogists then a dialogue has a chance to ensue, already Judith made a joke of most facts, and I don't think a dialogue can be achieved if basic data is twisted to fit a parallel universe reality:

You can not rely on the graduate website: look into trainee profiles and «days in the life of» to decipher culture and the reality of life at the firm; look at transactions and news stories to ensure you're up to date with the latest work and awards the firm is involved in and also pay attention to some facts and figures — don't name drop these but get them right, as it's embarrassing to get the basics wrong with any names or dates you might wish to mention!

But the basic fact in the article - that Justice Karakatsanis has «written only three decisions on her own» is flat wrong.