By focusing on thermometer - based land observations only, and ignoring other evidence conflicting with their hypothesis, MM04 failed to address
basic flaws in their arguments.
Not exact matches
Which is exactly why every time you post the garbage you learned
in those classes, it gets destroyed, showing the
flaws in the
basic premises, destroying the integrity of the
argument.
Your
argument is
flawed in its
basic premise; you are using logic and reason.
But the
basic flaw still exists
in your
argument — a lack of appreciation for uncertainty and a self - conferred «authority» that gets your
arguments into trouble repeatedly.