Kyoji Kimoto reviews
the basic global warming hypothesis.
Kyoji Kimoto shows why
the basic global warming hypothesis may be wrong.
Not exact matches
Today I link to «The Practice of Personal Attacking
Global Warming Skeptics — Rather than Responding to Their Scientific Criticisms», a guest post at Tony Heller's blog by Dr William Gray, where Dr Gray offered this bit in a longer story: «Why are the
warmers so afraid to have open and honest discussion about the
basic nitty - gritty assumptions of their AGW
hypothesis?
The
basic physics knowledge of the greenhouse effect have been examined since 1824 beginning with Joseph Fourier, the
hypothesis that we should
warm with continued CO2 emissions has been around for more than a hundred years, the general confirmations and realization that this will develop into a
global problem have been germinating for over 50 years, and in the last three decades the knowledge that the
warming we will experience will affect our climate and agricultural systems is well known.
The
basic assumption of many climate scientists that carbon dioxide is the main trigger of
global warming is a «
hypothesis» for Moore, nothing more.