And while so many understand
the basic idea of God as a Shepherd, there are far too many weary, aching, exhausted sheep to show any evidence that we have collectively allowed our lives to be restored in any meaningful way by the all - too - familiar Shepherd.
Not exact matches
1) everything is made
of energy 2) energy CAN NOT be created nor destroyed 3) energy merely changes from one form to another; matter / energy conversion 4) if energy can not be created nor destroyed then it remains a a constant 100 % 5) energy will always remina constant for ALL ETERNITY, thus the universe either recycles itself, or never stops exsisting 6) you «
idea of a
god» violates the
basic laws
of the universe, thus he can't exsist because we do.
This response leads us to believe that
God has no
idea of what these
basic principles are like.
With the widespread loss
of belief in
God as law - giver, the
idea of being morally bound or obliged — as if this or that verdict on your action hangs in the balance — loses its
basic meaning, however much it might retain its compelling psychological effect.
When you turn the light
of reason on the
basic of idea of god needing a sacrifice
of his own son to allow himself to forgive, it becomes just as ridiculous as condemning homosexuality.
If your
god is real, why hasn't he inspired every sincere seeker to at least understand one or two
basic aspects
of his existence right, such as the
idea that there is only one
god as opposed to multiple
gods?
The
basic idea of a Non-Violent view
of the atonement is that
God did not want or need the death
of Jesus in order to offer grace or forgiveness
of sins.
Religions have had millennia, yet there is still no consensus on even
basic ideas like the number
of gods that exist, much less any attributes they might have.
Beyond the power
of anachronisms to conceal, this word moves through the Bible correctly representing in its altering significance the progress
of the Hebrew - Christian
idea of God and
of the
basic conditions
of approaching him.
It is entirely possible, and has always been possible, to be an atheist as a Boy Scout, if you can accept the
basic idea of a moral something - or - other to which we should hold ourselves accountable, as long as you are comfortable calling it
God at least as a metaphor.
But behind Lincoln's understanding
of history was his
idea of a
God «who at times seems to want to frustrate the Statesman» (John Diggins, The Lost Soul
of American Politics [
Basic, 1984]-RRB- Lincoln «doubted that man could ever grasp
God's will and therefore believed that human action would always be estranged from divine intention» (p. 330) Lincoln divined that
God is both hidden and revealed.
The
idea of a trinity contradicts the most
basic tenet
of Judaism — that
God is One.
The
basic ideas in the meaning
of hell are alienation and separation from
God by persistent rejection
of him, the tighter forging
of the chains
of sin as we misuse our freedom, and the loneliness, remorse, and inner turmoil which are sin's worst punishment.
This manifests itself not only in the way in which Aristotelian notions
of the «unmoved mover» or neo-Platonic
ideas of «being - subsisting from - itself» have been taken to be the proper definition
of what is meant when we speak
of «
God», but also in liturgical language where all too often the
basic concept implied or (as most often seems to be the case) affirmed is the utter immutability
of deity, along with the rigidly legalistic moralism which it is suggested should mark those who claim to «obey» the divine mandates.
Presumably, if the
idea of God is to be even minimally significant, some sort
of religious experience is necessary.16 This appeal to religious experience is itself a qualified one, since Hartshorne is prepared to argue that positivism can not exhibit a coherence in its
basic life principles that is comparable to a theistic position.17 So he operates in general on the assumption that the crucial issues involved in man's attempts to conceptualize
God can and must be adjudicated by a rigorous analysis and criticism
of the various views
of God which are logically possible.
The two most
basic ideas in this hope
of the «parousia» are that the redemption
of the world does not require the destruction
of creation since creation is not itself evil, and secondly that redemption must come from
God since every human action remains with the contradictions
of sin.30
The
basic idea behind soul sleep is that when a person dies, they do not immediately go to heaven to be with
God, but enter into a state
of unconscious limbo.
We have become accustomed to the
idea that what
God asks
of us, the great
basic teachings
of our lives, and the great responses required by
God are somehow accessories» as if we can take them or leave them» as if they are just trinkets for those who choose to accept them.
Barth's
basic position was that the «theme
of theology» is «
God's revelation», rather than any given concepts in the history
of ideas.
One is the belief in progress.4 The expectation that life gets better for most people as time passes has been widespread since the 18th century.5 A
basic source
of the confidence in progress is the Biblical
idea that the Kingdom
of God will come at the end
of time.
This is an insight that is perhaps best expressed again in the words
of Cardinal Ratzinger, this time in 2001 writing in America magazine: «The
basic idea of sacred history is that
of gathering together,
of uniting — uniting human beings in the one body
of Christ, the union
of human beings and through human beings
of all creation with
God.
It was in such a situation
of complexity, suffering and oppression and denial
of basic human rights and humanity that one martyr, our contemporary, Dietrich Bonhoffer, came up with the
idea or faith reflection that «only a powerless
God can help».