In a telephone survey conducted during the summer of 2003, public school parents routinely expressed confusion over
basic points of fact.
Not exact matches
The letter also
points to the
fact that there more than 160 antidumping and countervailing duties in place against 37 countries and 25 categories
of basic steel products.
We do know
basic facts and those
point towards issues
of concern, concern because trust and loyalty and commitment are not throwaway traits whenever temptations strike.
If they financially support an effort to deny a group
of human beings a
basic human right, one that the Declaration
of Independence declared to be «inalienable» (the pursuit
of happiness), then yes, they are in
point of fact spreading hate.
As a starting
point for our consideration
of the Jewish conception
of the divinity
of Messiah we observe three definite,
basic facts.
D. E. Nineham
points out that «most commentators accept at any rate the
basic facts of the story, arguing that Christians would have been unlikely to invent a tradition in which Jesus receives hurried burial from a pious Jew, and his own followers have no part in the proceedings ’15 and then goes on to add that «scholarly opinion has perhaps been a little inclined to overlook the possible influence
of the Old Testament on the story».16
In that beautiful film, the computers are so sophisticated that they, in
fact, dominate human beings, even to the
point of experiencing
basic human emotions like spite, jealousy, and, unfortunately, revenge.
In
fact, Farrow's list
of fundamental truths
points eloquently to the
basic ontological foundations for human reproduction and the ethical education
of children in society, and from these he reasonably draws a normative social claim: Heterosexual marriage open to the transmission
of life is the morally normative context
of human sexuality.
I would
point more to the
fact that the overriding materialistic thinking
of today continues the
basic communistic assumption that people are simply and universally motivated by money.
However wan na commentary on few
basic issues, The web site style is great, the articles is in
point of fact excellent: D. Good task, cheers
I don't mean to be dicky here because personally I don't really care what Michael Bennett did or didn't do, but what does drive me crazy is when people debate potentially - heated topics like this and don't read up on the most
basic of facts, that are easily accessible, before trying to get a
point across.
«The legal strategy that we decided was optimum from our
point of view was to file the civil suit yesterday, lay out the entire case in a civil suit, seek certain remedies in the civil suit and commence a criminal investigation today on the same
basic underlying
facts and proceed with the criminal investigation jointly with our federal counterparts.»
But should commentary on some
basic issues, The site style is great, the articles is in
point of fact excellent: D. Just right task, cheers
So inevitable are these conclusions, in
fact, that I just gave up and accepted the ending, which sidesteps a first - glance case
of double jeopardy with such vague dialogue, recited in such a bland tone
of sotto voce, that I only got the
basic gist
of how we got from
Point A to
Point B. With
Point B such a shrug - worthy certainty, I wasn't nearly confused enough to care besides.
In
fact, the movie borrows
basic story
points from The Poseidon Adventure — as the school floods from the bottom up (freshman and sophomores first), Dash, his pals, and a motley band
of survivors make for the upper floors, then the roof, hoping for a rescue.
In
fact, the movie borrows
basic story
points from «The Poseidon Adventure» — as the school floods from the bottom up (freshman and sophomores first) Dash, his pals and a motley band survivors make for the upper floors
of the school, then the roof, hoping for a rescue.
Some
of the sub-processes, particularly
basic facts, need to be developed to the
point that they are done automatically.
That's kind
of the
point - this is driving for the necessity, under very difficult circumstances in a time and place when freedom
of movement wasn't a
basic fact of life like it is today.
However wan na remark on some
basic issues, The site taste is perfect, the articles is in
point of fact great: D. Excellent process, cheers
Add in a variety
of character role play - styles that go beyond the
basic «tank, sniper and medic,» a price
point that we feel is fair to the player and the
fact that it's just damn fun to play.»
Add in a variety
of character role play - styles that go beyond the
basic «tank, sniper and medic,» a price
point that we feel is fair to the player and the
fact that it's just damn fun to play - we're confident LawBreakers will be one
of the best valued and most challenging FPS games on PC or console.»
Add in a variety
of character role play - styles that go beyond the
basic «tank, sniper and medic,» a price
point that we feel is fair to the player and the
fact that it's just damn fun to play — we're confident LawBreakers will be one
of the best valued and most challenging FPS games on PC or console.»
In
fact, when I reached that
point in the game I don't even remember being overtly stunned, but the ways in which they change the
basics of the platforming can not be understated.
The
fact that so many people in the world believe, without understanding even the
basic concepts, that global warming is indeed an issue should be a
point of concern, not cause for celebration.
You say «the question
of whether this or that storm is caused by human activity overlooks the
basic fact that at this
point in history both natural and human influence are involved.»
«the question
of whether this or that storm is caused by human activity overlooks the
basic fact that at this
point in history both natural and human influence are involved.
John Carter August 8, 2014 at 12:58 am chooses to state his position on the greenhouse effect in the following 134 word sentence: «But given the [1]
basics of the greenhouse effect, the
fact that with just a very small percentage
of greenhouse gas molecules in the air this effect keeps the earth about 55 - 60 degrees warmer than it would otherwise be, and the
fact that through easily recognizable if [2] inadvertent growing patterns we have at this
point probably at least [3] doubled the total collective amount in heat absorption and re-radiation capacity
of long lived atmospheric greenhouse gases (nearly doubling total that
of the [4] leading one, carbon dioxide, in the modern era), to [5] levels not collectively seen on earth in several million years — levels that well predated the present ice age and extensive earth surface ice conditions — it goes [6] against
basic physics and
basic geologic science to not be «predisposed» to the idea that this would ultimately impact climate.»
As Bobdroege says, with Trenberth, the question
of whether this or that storm is caused by human activity overlooks the
basic fact that at this
point in history both natural and human influence are involved.
However should observation on some
basic things, The website taste is perfect, the articles is in
point of fact nice: D. Just right job, cheers
I quite like Phil jones's work, in
fact one
of his books is on my Christmas present list (hint) The
basic point as I understand it from Willis was that Jones deliberately avoided responding to a FOI request.
On the other hand, the results would be founded in observational
facts and data, and would not be nearly as subject to the whims and biases
of an agendized clique
of climate modelers whose
basic starting
point is, and always will be, «Nothing else but C02 explains it.»
In my previous blog post, I showed a window into the world
of far - left environmentalist reasoning, using the exact illustration
of how Desmogblog co-founder James Hoggan immediately believed Ross Gelbspan's «the science is settled / skeptic scientists are industry - corrupted shills» core talking
point as literally true upon first reading it, never reading alternative science assessments or doing the most
basic fact - checking to see if Gelbspan's accusation was true.
It's incredulous to me that no one
points out this
basic fact of physics that implodes the «carbon dioxide is a warming molecule».
We prepared a summary
of the
basic principles in the leading high - asset high - income cases, highlighting useful
points for negotiation, and prepared bullet
point digests
of similar
fact cases which were easy to review and compare.
A casual yet
pointed conversation between you and the homeowner should confirm the
basic facts about the home (number
of bedrooms, bathrooms, etc.) and identify what steps the homeowner has taken to improve the property.
The five listing
points that Bruce Keith has itemized certainly aren't to be confused with «rocket science» — as a matter
of fact it's the kind
of basic advice that probably gets thrown at every newbie.