Sentences with phrase «basic points of your paper»

Use a truly wonderful opportunity to ask questions, highlight essential ideas, and discuss the basic points of your paper.

Not exact matches

Throughout 1977 DCS staff, working with the panel, collected data on energy use and production, generated papers representing different points of view on basic energy questions, and held smaller consultations with subgroupings in the larger panel.

The basic points which I wish to draw attention to in the paper of Dr. K.K. George are contained in his «summing Up» part on p. 24.

«While we celebrate the «a ha» moment of scientific discovery and invention, such moments are only the point of initiation for the basic research required to develop new drugs,» said Dr. Laura McNamee, the lead author of the paper and a research associate in Bentley's Center for Integration of Science and Industry.

«We all have an intuitive understanding that basic research provides the starting point for new drug development, but in this paper we wanted to quantify and illuminate features of that path.

Explain the basic concepts of perspective drawing, describing how one can represent objects at a distance on paper by making objects appear smaller and closer together as they near the vanishing point.

As a result, neither of these points refutes the basic argument of this paper, which is that spending on education is higher when the middle class is stronger.

The first thing a book writer should learn to do is writing in the basic form of a feature article: the Three Point Five Paragraph Paper, 3.5 paper, or the Five - paragraph EPaper, 3.5 paper, or the Five - paragraph Epaper, or the Five - paragraph Essay.

The basic point of writing a summary paper is to make the reader wary of what the author of the thesis thinks about the topics in discussion.

But Roe and Baker's paper is probably the most succinct and accessible treatment of the subject to date, and is a timely reminder of some very basic points that are not always appreciated.

But the more basic point here is that the Cowtan paper does not use the satellite time trend (which is somewhat unreliable — remember the long history of corrections, and the difference in trends between the UAH and RSS products), it only uses the satellite spatial pattern to fill the data holes.

It's rather sad that the only lesson you take from Weart is an out of context of a single paper, rather than the copious work on the basics of climate change that I pointed you to.

This points out the basic fallacy of the arguments in this paper.

There's a sociologist called Reiner Grundmann at Aston University who had a paper on climategate discussed at Klimazwiebel, in which he made the key point that scientific method demands that both sides of a socially contentious subject need to be discussed impartially — a basic principle of scientific method which has escaped the Nuticcellis and Lewandowskys.

Thus, as Isaac Held pointed out, the basic physics is correct, increased GH gases cause an increase in net energy of the system, but this new paper further refines the dynamics, with (in my mind) some new exciting understanding of how the process actually unfolds.

There is some relationship to the papers of Jayne, but not to the point that his work would provide support to your most basic claims.

There is no excuse for being unaware of basic point everyone discussing the paper has acknowledged then calling people «naive» for their beliefs.

Transaction in between is completely untraceable, based on the basic fundamental of zero point paper.