But for most people,
a basic points strategy will be plenty to get that free trip you've always wanted.
Not exact matches
«The legal
strategy that we decided was optimum from our
point of view was to file the civil suit yesterday, lay out the entire case in a civil suit, seek certain remedies in the civil suit and commence a criminal investigation today on the same
basic underlying facts and proceed with the criminal investigation jointly with our federal counterparts.»
I just went back to
basics, forming my re-entry
strategy around a simple five
point plan: 1) consistent paid -LSB-...]
Being old fashioned, I gravitate to
basics such as: — pay down all debt as quickly as is reasonably possible — broadly diversify across at least 5 asset classes — keep expenses low — its OK to have an advisor for their expertise in security selection but never give an advisor control over how your money is invested i.e. style,
strategy, asset allocation — if you want to take a flyer on a hunch (and we all do at some
point) take the funds out of your core investment account and create a «satelite» account
There are theoretically more complex
strategies and products on both sides of this debate, but both practically and for policy purposes, an empirical investigation into the
basic choices is an excellent starting
point for discussion.
Gameplay feels fresh for an RPG: traveling between different
points in time to advance the story adds an engrossing element to story progression, and the position - based battle system adds a layer of
strategy that makes even the most
basic skirmishes exciting.
About halfway through the second game we do get to talk about some
basic strategy, but the main
point is that you can see what the game looks like.