«The agency's move meant that six federal agencies that provide the bulk of the nation's
basic research funding now have public access policies required by a 2013 White House order.
Not exact matches
I am not calling for cuts to government programs as of
now — they are necessary for so many people's
basic survival — but Mr. Beck does have a pertinent point: voting to tax someone else (typically wealthier than us) to provide assistance does not necessarily demonstrate a society that «cares» — much more caring is a society that willingly donates those
funds to charities they have taken the time to
research, and more caring still if the members of that society take the time to volunteer to administer that aid.
Though details are still scarce, one expectation is that
funding for
basic research will rise to 10 % of total R&D spending by 2020, up from less than 5 %
now.
While the first 30 - million - DM round of
funding focused more on
basic research, the emphasize
now shifts toward applied
research.
The second reason is that advances in
basic research now are downplayed by the
funding agencies and by universities, due to its greater distance from generating new products and financial rewards.
Most federal
funding, even for «
basic research»,
now wants a statement of significance for society (just saying it helps us understand the atom isn't good enough) and one is supposed even to structure the project to achieve progressive goals like minority recruitment to science.