Sentences with phrase «basic rule of science»

«The basic rule of science is that hypotheses must be verified by observed data before they can be regarded as facts.

Not exact matches

Yet, instead of believing in a Creator and Intelligent Design, you, the science and fact believer, go against the very basic rules of your same scientific beliefs and claim the Universe was NOT created, it just poofed into existence from nothing.

The business side of science operates on fundamentally different rules than does basic research.

While there was a lot of interesting science in this paper (the new methodology, the range of results etc.) which fully justified its appearance in Nature, we were quite critical of their basic conclusion — that climate sensitivities significantly higher than the standard range (1.5 — 4.5 ºC) were plausible — because there is significant other data, predominantly from paleo - climate, that pretty much rule those high numbers out (as we discussed again recently).

Janelia scientists are working on some of science's most challenging problems: discovering the basic rules and mechanisms of the brain's information - processing system and developing optical, biological, and computational technologies for creating and interpreting biological images.

Under proposed rules now being considered in both New Hampshire and Vermont, school districts would be required to increase basic academic offerings — particularly in mathematics and science — and improve the overall quality of their programs before they could receive state approval.

Frances Caballo presents 3 Basic Rules of Social Media Plus 5 Best Practices posted at Social Media Just for Writers, saying, «Dan Zarrella, author of The Science of Marketing, said in his book, «I've long been interested in the idea that engaging in conversation is the single most important function of social media marketing.»

While there was a lot of interesting science in this paper (the new methodology, the range of results etc.) which fully justified its appearance in Nature, we were quite critical of their basic conclusion — that climate sensitivities significantly higher than the standard range (1.5 — 4.5 ºC) were plausible — because there is significant other data, predominantly from paleo - climate, that pretty much rule those high numbers out (as we discussed again recently).

They bypassed this most basic rule in science, which underscores the paradox of rules.

It's a tragedy that many right - wingers have ruled themselves out of serious debate, with their idiotic, tribally motivated denial of basic science.