Because
our basic theological understandings of grace include assent to the claim that the most beautiful and precious things in and about our lives are unearned and undeserved, themes of gift and gratitude sometimes seem overworked.
Not exact matches
My disagreements with the five points of both Calvinism and Arminianism iare not exactly with their theology or
understanding of Biblical texts, but with something much more
basic than that: their definition of certain biblical words and
theological ideas, such as election, grace, salvation, atonement, justification, eternal life, forgiveness of sins, etc, etc..
In
theological correlation, Christianity's truth claims and specifity were undercut to the extent that works of art provided the
basic model on which those claims were to be
understood.
If we are to raise really
basic questions about Brunner's position, we must direct our attention to his
understanding of revelation in encounter as the basis for all
theological reflection.
Having noted
basic differences in these positions, we can then look at a number of questions which evangelicals must address if they hope to move beyond the present impasse in their
theological understanding of the doctrine of inspiration.
Critical scholarship — not only historical critical scholarship, but also newer approaches to the Bible using critical theory — has pressed our
understanding of the texts and traditions of ancient Christianity to the point where organized Christianity, if it were to be guided by such work, would have to begin to rethink some of its
basic theological commitments.
Thus Cyril C. Richardson has criticized the classical formulations of the Trinity as imposing an arbitrary «threeness» upon our
theological thinking, and proposes instead a
basic twofold distinction between God as Absolute and God as Related.1 This is for Richardson a
basic paradox, an apparent self - contradiction, for if we try to bring these aspects into relationship, we compromise God's absoluteness.2 Charles Hartshorne accepts this same twofold distinction, but he removes the contradictory element by
understanding it in terms of the abstract and concrete dimensions of God's nature and experience.3
Resolution of the
basic issues turns on just how the end of
theological education is
understood.
What are the
basic biblical and
theological issues involved in a contemporary
understanding of marriage?
Process thought, as he has helped me to
understand it, is centered in the effort to think through all the
basic metaphysical, moral, epistemological, and
theological issues from the standpoint of evolutionary developmentalism.
Schleiermacher has always been a
theological model not so much in the content of his thought as in his
basic approach to faith, which is a very rational, historically oriented approach within a tradition, with the
understanding that one can not simply swallow the tradition but has to enter into a reasonable dialogue with it.