Sentences with phrase «basics of defending»

People also know that he has an at - best equivocal attitude to some of the basics of defending the country and maintaining people's physical security; and they know that most of his colleagues in Parliament did not want him as leader.

Some of them are the fundamental basics of defending: others are specific to the numerical disadvantage posed by a counterattack.

The man doesn't know the basics of defending so selling and buying players will not change anything.

Let Bouldy teach the basic of defending set pieces we have too many recurring simple errors and a general lack of aggression in terms of attacking the ball when it is played into our box.

Not exact matches

The basic idea that Freeman defends is that corporate managers shouldn't see themselves as beholden primarily to shareholders, but rather as ethically obligated to balance the interests of a wide range of stakeholders.

Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross defended President Donald Trump's plan to raise tariffs on steel and aluminum with a can of Campbell soup, a Budweiser tallboy, and some basic arithmetic.

Even defending the basic rights of individual members in this political climate can be a major struggle — but we don't back down.

When Romney defended the basic structure of Obamacare Romneycare he usually won.

Such was — and is — the basic program designed to defend the public character of theology.

Yet he still defends (something like) their concept of subjectivity as a basic requirement for maintaining the personhood of God.

I have indeed attempted to interpret and defend the basic Reformation image of the ministry, with its representation of preacher before open Bible on pulpit.

In an earlier era, freethinkers understood that the society in which they lived depended in part on the basic view of the world accepted by their fellow citizens — hence Robert Ingersoll and Elizabeth Cady Stanton not only defended a clear churchstate separation but commented onthe merits of specific religious ideas held by their contemporaries.

Rather is the freedom of the learner a basic right that it is the duty of the social order to acknowledge, celebrate, and defend.

There is no «rock and a hard place» set of choices here for Christians, nor is there any in Nigeria and Uganda on the front of basic human rights that Christians themselves helped define and defend: We are called to speak the truth in love, to oppose what is wrong, and to do so whether or not it is culturally comfortable or politically secure.

Values must be defended by appealing to other more fundamental values and beliefs that are also yours (perhaps you will refer to the Bible or the Qur «an or some other sacred text) which are not going to be accepted by those who have basic disagreements with your point of view in the first place.

Those who have devoted their energies to defending the traditional view have rightly said that the affirmation of the resurrection of Jesus is basic Christian faith.

May this land of the free never lack those brave enough to defend our basic freedoms.

Cialdini not only provides great insights into some of the basic psychological motivators that drive humans, but also provides ways to defend ourselves when marketers and salesmen try to manipulate us with these tools.

And even more fundamentally, if we are bearers of inviolable dignity and a basic right to life in virtue of our humanity, and not in virtue of accidental qualities such as age, or size, or stage of development or condition of dependency --- if, in other words, we believe in the fundamental equality of human beings --- how can a right to abortion (where «abortion» means performing an act whose purpose is to cause fetal death) be defended at all?

A major theologian in recent years who has defended such a moral and ethical kingdom as basic to the message of Jesus is L. Harold DeWolf in A Theology of the Living Church.

But I have to wonder why so many fundamentalist Christians still look to him to defend their faith, because Lewis» theology (especially as articulated in Mere Christianity) is severally at odds with some of the most basic traditional Christian dogmas (e.g. hell and who's going there, et cetera).

These differences reflect, in turn, the basic divergence of the two philosophers in epistemological and metaphysical matters — Mill is a thoroughgoing empiricist who holds that even mathematical propositions are generalizations from experience (SL 147 - 69) while Hartshorne defends a rationalistic metaphysics including a priori proofs for the existence of God (CSPM 43 - 56).

As the title of his lecture signals, Berlin's basic intellectual move was to distinguish between «negative liberty» and «positive liberty,» and then to defend the former as the only concept of liberty that could be actualized in the «real world» of inevitably conflicting interests, diverse concepts of the good, and competing human projects.

People invariably defend their actions by arguing that those actions do not really contradict a basic standard of behavior, or that the standard was violated for good reasons.

He reflects carefully on the basic dilemma» that defending democracy and its rights and liberties may require an abrogation of at least some of those rights and liberties, at least for some persons and for a limited time» and he explicitly sets out to make a moral argument rather than the legal and political - theory arguments favored among critics of the war on terror.

While he qualifies and conditions this in various ways, the basic point is still the same: that the good aimed at (defending democracy from terrorism) justifies the doing of evil (using means that involve violence, force, and coercion).

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

I want a back - to - basics centre back who excels at defending first - & - foremost at Arsenal, that rules out Stones - he's made his reputation by being very accomplished at dribbling the ball out of defence and playing it forward.

Pep brought some of that basic team defending discipline to Man City and they conceded basically half the goals we did (19 vs 10) and only 1 more than league - best Man U (9).

Players give zero fucks about Wenger they are waiting for a real manager to come in and actually teach them, like basic defending 101 or when you break 4 against two how to actually not play yourself off side.Wenger were arrogant in the fa cup and got seriously punished with woeful players like Wally and Welbz having atrocious games.He did nt intentionally dump the fa cup he made a huge miscalculation and got punished, end of story.

He would make a great partner with the real Boss Chambers wow, dismal performance, need to learn a lot of basics about defending Coquelin kept us in the game Cazorla not good at all, he has no power in midfield.

we had some really nice moments with lacazette jack sanchez and ozil hinting at what could have been... and dominated for 75 minutes... but in the other 15 there was some real horror shows with bellerin a real shocker but whatever steve bold understands by defencing he needs to think again... some of the gaps left were basic defending errors but again the failure to press is what is upsetting given the wages these guys are on... working hard should not be a big ask!!

Arsenal have done it again by putting all thier backs on coquelin's shoulder and now he gets injured who will replace him?flamini «can't pass the ball and leaves arsenal open», arteta «no chance and was one of main reasons arsenal drew 3 - 3 against andrelecht» and the other candidate wilshere «bullshit he can't defend properly and might as well leave the club» I would prefer Christoph Kramer who is tall, mobile and will provide cover for our defence and in the recent match against Australia he came on as a substitute and provided the basic cover Germany needed.

Basic defending, who was picking the player up on the edge of the box??

If Arsenal is to defend zonally they need to go back to basics or use a mixture of zonal and man marking.

Regardless he should bench Wilshere and Ozil for the Villa game and start 2 out of Santi / Rosicky / Ox I have defended Ozil in the recent games but I also feel like he was really atrocious because even the basics weren't good enough this time.

Indeed, a major reason Kelly's offense was so difficult to defend at Oregon was because he would combine a small handful of basic, sound blocking schemes — inside zone, outside zone, and his patented sweep — with a flurry of QB reads of everyone from defensive tackles to linebackers and even safeties.

What if he had actually done a basic bit of defending and grappled back?

If we can not compete financially then we must at least compete tactically and motivate the players we have and also train them the basic rules of defending.

For Conservatives, autonomy of property seems to be regarded most highly, while liberals defend as most urgent the equality of attainment of basic rights.

In both countries, the judiciary, military and security apparatus jealously defended the basic theological tenets of the system, while the bodies of women were the primary arena of contestation: in Turkey, they were punished if they sported Islamic dress; in Iran, if they did not.

«We have got a duty to defend some really basic principles — like reform of society through parliamentary democracy — and we mustn't be afraid to hold whoever becomes leader to account for them.»

It is one of ALLEA's tasks to defend the role of basic science (in all fields of scientific inquiry), and to argue for the diversity of national research traditions as potential assets to be carefully evaluated.

We teach students the basics on how to defend themselves when someone gets them down on the ground and a little bit of stand up.

The strong scent of deja vu hangs over everything — a cop even asks how Haller can sleep at night given the scum he defends — but nothing prevents the movie from its basic job of entertainment.

The single - disc release includes all of the special feature basics (deleted scenes, outtakes and an alternate ending), but it's been a long time since I've listened to a director (in this case, the brotherly duo of Anthony and Joe Russo) defend their movie with such fervor.

Classroom instruction in these charters frequently appeared to honor the acquisition of basic, fundamental skills exactly the topics and items commonly found on standardized tests — over more cognitively engaging tasks such as arguing, defending, supporting, valuing, or evaluating.

As advocates of «back to basics» math become ever more critical of Discovery Learning educators are increasingly asked to defend new methods of learning math.

«The fact that she doesn't understand the basics about federal education law is just appalling,» says Denise Marshall, the executive director of the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates (COPAA), a national organization that defends the legal and civil rights of students with disabilities.

For all that money, one would expect that NAEP could defend its benchmarks of Basic, Proficient, and Advanced by pointing to rock - solid studies of the validity of its benchmarks and the science underlying them.