«I want them to think through what they read online, to apply all the skills they learned in the class — evaluating source credibility, identifying logical fallacies, recognizing bias,
basing written arguments on solid evidence — to social media platforms just as much as they do in their academic work.»
Not exact matches
She uses as
bases of her
arguments the philosophies of «early Christians,» which I feel bears no weight as they were not the prophets who understood and
wrote the holy scripture.
In fact, today I had planned to
write a post speaking out against tentative plans in the Tennessee legislature to adopt immigration policies similar to those that caused such controversy in Arizona,
basing my
argument on the inherent worth of our Hispanic neighbors.
If the article above was
written by a grown adult about the existence of Santa Claus, and if that
argument was essentially
based on asserting Santa Claus» existence
based on faith and the popularity of the Santa Claus myth, then anyone would be justified in scorning those beliefs, especially when that
argument extends to declaring that recent findings confirm the existence of Santa (after all, children are still receiving Christmas gifts).
To say that the claims that are
based off of a book were created after the book was first
written is just stupid (maybe your
argument isn't what you typed and you made an error in trying to convey your thoughts).
«Although the book was
written against her now dead half - sister,» continues Gonzalez, «Elizabeth resented much of what it said, for its
arguments based on anti-feminine prejudice could just as easily apply to her.
Regardless, most of my
argument is
based on the context and historical situation Malachi was
writing to, as well as the cultural context of the sacrificial system.
You should probably
write a letter to the UFC's lawyers — you could save them millions of dollars in legal fees
based on your foolproof
argument.
«Martins»
argument is
based on a completely false premise,» Pidot said in a
written response to the court.
«The theories that Hawking and Mlodinow use to
base their
arguments on have as much empirical evidence as God,»
wrote cosmologist Marcelo Gleiser on an NPR.org blog.
They read a novel about life in urban America, they
write letters to city council members and state representatives, the compile statistics to support their
arguments in their letters; in short, they use their discipline -
based skills of scientific inquiry, math, literacy, social studies and health to do what people in the real world do — synthesize the skills and knowledge in a meaningful way.
Teachers will need to incorporate lessons that ask students to analyze exemplar oral and
written arguments, and they will need to increase the number of
writing and speaking assignments in which students argue their opinion about a topic or theme, using text -
based evidence as support.
The Common Core
writing standards call for students to focus on evidence -
based writing — specifically
argument and informative / explanatory texts in high school, with less time spent on
writing «real or imagined» narratives (the elementary and middle school Standards (PDF) suggest that the split be roughly even between the three genres).
To help students prepare their
arguments, teachers guide them through the three stages of
writing -
based inquiry:
The district is also focusing on the
writing standard that expects students to compose
arguments based on textual evidence.
These include students» performance on
written scientific explanations and
arguments, which is
based on teacher - assigned rubric scores of
writing tasks.
One of the main
arguments for charter schools is that the government can
write performance -
based contracts, then close or take over schools that fall short on performance.
A similar form of
argument contrasting non-knowledge-
based and knowledge -
based instructional approaches applies to «argumentation» or «
writing» as science learning activities.
Learn what the research says about how to develop expertise in this genre of
writing — building an understanding of (persuasive) schema; developing stronger
writing prompts for the 3
argument types (fact -
based, judgment -
based, policy -
based); and teaching students how to find and use the most relevant evidence (text, data, etc.) needed to support each
argument / opinion type.
Leading high - level, text -
based discussions; increasing text complexity («text» can be defined as
written word, works of art, dance, theater, poetry, etc.); providing text -
based evidence to support
arguments.
NSCS's
writing curriculum focuses on ensuring students understand and apply basic grammar skills through the explicit, research -
based teaching required to develop rich
written language and helps the student apply these skills to research, informative
writing, persuasive
argument, narratives and college preparatory
writing.
Ultimately, CRWP had a positive, statistically significant effect on the four attributes of student
argument writing — content, structure, stance, and conventions — measured by the National Writing Project's Analytic Writing Continuum for Source - Based A
argument writing — content, structure, stance, and conventions — measured by the National Writing Project's Analytic Writing Continuum for Source - Based Ar
writing — content, structure, stance, and conventions — measured by the National
Writing Project's Analytic Writing Continuum for Source - Based Ar
Writing Project's Analytic
Writing Continuum for Source - Based Ar
Writing Continuum for Source -
Based ArgumentArgument.
Based on the principle that the primary purpose of grammar instruction is to improve student
writing, this grammar program teaches the conventions of standard English and takes students through the complete
writing process as they
write arguments, informative / explanatory texts, and narratives.
Throughout the science curriculum, students will move through the inquiry process by asking questions, using tools, developing models, carrying out investigations, analyzing and interpreting data, developing evidence -
based arguments and using skills such as reading,
writing, and math to explore science concepts.
Their students» achievements demonstrate how effective and engaging professional development prepares teachers to lead lessons that not only teach youth how to
write evidence -
based arguments, but can also actively engage students in civic life.
These projects grew out of the participation of two accomplished teachers in the National
Writing Project's College, Career, and Community Writers Program (C3WP), which aims to improve young people's ability to
write thoughtful, evidence -
based arguments.
When Bjorn Lomborg
wrote «Green Cars Have a Dirty Little Secret» for The Wall Street Journal earlier this month, he
based his
argument — that electric.
It's important to must mention that if you really believe everything you
wrote, then —
based on your
arguments — technically, you couldn't call the man and woman who (allegedly) raised you, your real parents.
Paper
Writing Service underlines that paper writing based on theses can reflect several points of view, when argument - led approach will divide them into 2 groups: positive and ne
Writing Service underlines that paper
writing based on theses can reflect several points of view, when argument - led approach will divide them into 2 groups: positive and ne
writing based on theses can reflect several points of view, when
argument - led approach will divide them into 2 groups: positive and negative.
Each student must know how to
write an
argument paper as this paper
writing is the
basis to many academic essays, research papers, term papers, coursework, master theses, etc..
It is better to lead two
arguments in favor of each idea: one
argument seems unconvincing while three
arguments can «reload»
argument essay
writing performed in the genre
based on figurativeness and brevity.
To complete a quality academic
writing like this one, your statements have to be
based on the solid
arguments.
Also, when
writing a thesis, keep in mind that you should provide a well - reasoned line of
argument, set data in a general context, and finally make a conclusion
based on your analysis.
How To
Write An Argument PaperEach student must know how to write an argument paper as this paper writing is the basis to many academic essays, research papers, term papers, coursework, master theses,
Write An
Argument PaperEach student must know how to write an argument paper as this paper writing is the basis to many academic essays, research papers, term papers, coursework, master these
Argument PaperEach student must know how to
write an argument paper as this paper writing is the basis to many academic essays, research papers, term papers, coursework, master theses,
write an
argument paper as this paper writing is the basis to many academic essays, research papers, term papers, coursework, master these
argument paper as this paper
writing is the
basis to many academic essays, research papers, term papers, coursework, master theses, etc..
Indeed, the idea is the
basis of any
writing assignment which is supported by
arguments and understandable word expressions.
As a rule, teachers, and professors evaluate such works
based on each students»
writing and critical thinking skills, combined with the ability to draw logical conclusions and support personal viewpoint with strong
arguments and facts.
In - depth research - For
writing an excellent assignment you need to need profound research on the topic, collect all the facts relating to it and make yoru
argument based on all the logical facts.
«I think King.com has a strong
argument that most of the consumer
base in question (e.g., those purchasing on app stores, etc.) are impulse buyers, and thus may be more inclined to make snap judgments
based on simple word usage like «candy» and «saga»,» he or she
wrote.
As for the formalistic
argument, I will quote Los Angeles -
based Italian painter Nicola Verlato, who
wrote this on his Facebook page: «The choice of making the defacement of Emmett Till coinciding with a «painted defacement» of the face is inappropriate because it negates the figure and as such neutralizes a potentially wider social engagement of the work.
being that Mann's paper was
written in 98...... the frame work for Kyoto was laid down in 92, refined in the latter part of the 90s, and so forth...... where is the actual documentation
basis for their said
argument?
Peter Gleick, a water, environment and energy analyst who in April played the tornado card,
wrote this week on the heat with a far stronger scientific
basis and something rare in climate
arguments — nuance.
My first reaction was to think that you would be more effective if you simply presented clearly data and
arguments that prove that the Robinson et al.
arguments are riddled with important errors and
based on bias rather than scientific arguement, without blatantly ridiculing of the people who
wrote the article.
I was going to
write about the possibility of Birol quote mainly being used for effect than being the foundation of his whole
argument, when it reminded me that I'd seen that film before and the paper it's
based on.
In the conclusion to his «Plan B» chapter (p 228), Bob Carter
writes: «It is therefore time to move away from stale «he - says - she - says»
arguments about whether human carbon dioxide emissions are causing dangerous warming, and on to designing effective policies of hazard management for all climate change,
based on adaptation responses that are tailored for individual countries or regions... By their very nature, strategies that can cope with the dangers and vagaries of natural climate change will readily cope with human - caused change too should it ever become manifest.»
But huge chunks of readers on the «right» and «left» (to keep this simple) will reject my
arguments and question my motives — not on the
basis of evidence or lousy
writing, but because they don't see me as one of them.
On the
basis of the unreliable
arguments I think I can understand what is
written by Judith Curry https://judithcurry.com/2010/10/19/overconfidence-in-ipccs-detection-and-attribution-part-ii:
however since Judith
wrote that, the video of the presentation has been made available, so we have seen the slides, and we know the
basis of the
argument, and the fatal flaw in the
argument has been pointed out.
British Columbia will be presenting oral final
arguments to the Joint Review Panel when hearings recommence in Terrace on 17 June,
based on BC's final
written submission.
So to the extent that you are trying to criticize my
argument based on the field from which I
write, you should know that I approach these things, not as a law professor, but rather as a social scientist with fairly heavy training in statistics.
Well, it looks like the press release was carefully worded, and referring back to Anthony Watts article on his blog which is criticized at the beginning of the RC article, i see no wrong claim there... Hiss main
argument is
written in bold: «The IPCC is under scrutiny for various data inaccuracies, including its claim —
based on a flawed World Wildlife Fund study — that up to 40 % of the Amazonian forests could react drastically and be replaced by savannas from even a slight reduction in rainfall.»