Not exact matches
For this reason, an acquittal or
conviction in a prosecution for a specific crime under the laws
of the United States shall bar a proceeding for
criminal contempt, which is
based upon the same act or omission and which arises under the provisions
of this Act; and an acquittal or
conviction in a proceeding for
criminal contempt, which arises under the provisions
of this Act, shall bar a prosecution for a specific crime under the laws
of the United States
based upon the same act or omission.
In part, the judge
based his decision on The Rehabilitation
of Offenders Act 1974, an English law that allows
criminal convictions to become «spent» after a prescribed period
of time.
While federal law does not specifically prohibit discrimination
based on
criminal convictions or arrests, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued a policy statement indicating that an employer's use
of criminal history information in making employment decisions may violate the federal prohibition against discrimination
based on race or national origin.
On the
basis of Article 4 (2)
of the FD on the exchange
of information extracted from the
criminal record, central authorities
of the MS where a person is convicted have to inform the central authorities
of the MS
of which that person has the citizenship
of the person's
conviction, and the latter authority has to safeguard the information on the
conviction as provided by Article 5 (1)
of the same instrument.
Singh alleged he was subjected to discrimination in employment on the
basis of an unrelated
criminal or summary
conviction offence contrary to section 13
of the B.C. Human Rights Code.
While there may well be a legal
basis supporting a
conviction for 10 difference offenses arising from a single
criminal action (a friend tells the story, which may be apocryphal,
of a fellow who was carrying a handgun with nine bullets and was charged with illegal posession
of a firearm and 9 counts
of attempted murder - one for each bullet).
The doctrine
of collateral estoppel may apply when a
criminal conviction is
based on facts identical to the facts on which a civil case is
based.
As reported in the written decision
of the Law Society Hearing Panel (which decision is under appeal by the applicant), the applicant threatened to sue the other board members for defamation after he was removed as President
of the condo corporation and a notice
of his removal was posted; circulated a letter (under a false name) on some floors within the building that falsely stated that some
of the board members had previously gone bankrupt, had
criminal convictions and were accepting bribes and free meals from the developer
of the condominium to settle deficiencies with the developer; made a derogatory remark about some
of the residents
based on their ethnicity; threatened to report some
of the directors to US / Canada border officials, falsely alleging that they were drug smugglers; threatened both the corporation's property manager and security services firm that their contracts with the condo corporation would be in jeopardy if they did not provide a character letter to the applicant.
Currently, the protected ground
of «record
of offences» protects against discrimination only on the
basis of: (a)
convictions under provincial legislation such as the Highway Traffic Act, and (b)
convictions under federal legislation such as the
Criminal Code, for which a pardon has not been granted.
Proposing a complete overhaul
of the existing system, the Commissioner has recommended that MAG, through its Provincial Jury Centre (PJC), be the only central body to screen jurors who are ineligible for jury duty,
based on
criminal conviction.
Based on the findings
of the investigation, the Commissioner is ordering Crown attorneys to cease collecting any personal information
of potential jurors beyond that which is permitted under the Juries Act and the
Criminal Code, relevant to criminal conviction elig
Criminal Code, relevant to
criminal conviction elig
criminal conviction eligibility.
The Innocence Project
of Florida encourages institutional actors in the State
of Florida to create broad -
based criminal justice reform commissions to study wrongful
convictions and advocate for changes in the system.
Although not decided on the
basis of the Charter, this case provides valuable insight into the necessary fault requirement for a
criminal conviction, breathing new meaning into the «principles
of fundamental justice» stemming from our common law tradition, and later enshrined in Section 7
of the Charter
of Rights and Freedoms.
2007), which held for the first time that a
conviction for sex with minor is not necessarily a crime involving moral turpitude; Camins v. Gonzales, 500 F. 3d 872 (9th Cir 2007) which applied retroactivity principles to find that the grounds
of inadmissibility do not apply to returning lawful permanent residents
based on
criminal conviction sustained before April 1, 1997; and Li v. Ashcroft, 389 F. 3d 892 (9th Cir.
Based on Client's
criminal record with a number
of convictions including for fraud and the fact that Client was on bail for three outstanding charges, the Crown sought Client's detention in custody.
The
Criminal Cases Review Commission should not normally refer a
conviction to the Court
of Appeal on the
basis of a change
of law.
In more than 100 cases since 1980, Massachusetts courts
of appeal have thrown out
criminal convictions based on prosecutorial improprieties, and in 20
of those cases they have used the words «egregious» or «misconduct» or both to describe impropriety.
(4) A relevant decision may not be taken except on imperative grounds
of public security in respect
of an EEA national who: (a) has resided in the UK for a continuous period
of at least 10 years before the relevant decision; or... (5) Where a relevant decision is taken on grounds
of public policy or public security it shall, in addition to complying with the preceding paragraphs
of this regulation, be taken in accordance with the following principles --(a) the decision must comply with the principle
of proportionality; (b) the decision must be
based exclusively on the personal conduct
of the person concerned; (c) the personal conduct
of the person concerned must represent a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one
of the fundamental interests
of society; (d) matters isolated from the particulars
of the case or which relate to considerations
of general prevention do not justify the decision; and (e) a person's previous
criminal convictions do not in themselves justify the decision.
«Under Canadian law, the Minister
of Justice has the legal authority to review a
criminal conviction on the
basis that there may have been a miscarriage
of justice -LRB-...)»
The EEOC urges HR professionals and hiring managers to evaluate a number
of factors before making a hiring determination
based on
criminal history, including the nature
of the offense, the severity
of the offense, the time that has passed since the offense, and how that
conviction relates to the job.
First, our ArrestDirect locator expands the breadth
of a
criminal records search for arrest records and
convictions based on potential aliases and addresses listed on a Social Security Number Trace.
Based on our survey, over 48 %
of employers ask about
criminal convictions on the application while 28 % do not ask candidates about prior
criminal history at all.
A blanket exclusion
based on a
criminal history
of any kind — even limited to felony
convictions or similar restrictions — is likely to violate an applicant's rights.