Not exact matches
Most would say that if the device advertises 99 percent accuracy, then there
is a 99 percent chance that the device
is correctly discerning a diamond, and a 1 percent chance that it has given a
false positive reading.
In an RTI framework, the goal of screening for
reading problems
is to have very few
false negatives by using instruments that yield true -
positive rates approaching 100 % (Compton, Fuchs, Fuchs, & Bryant, 2006; Jenkins, 2003; Jenkins & Johnson, 2008).
Misclassified cases
are either
false positives (FPs; those students identified as at risk who later perform satisfactorily on
reading outcomes) or
false negatives (FNs; those students not identified by the screen as at - risk but who later perform poorly on
reading outcomes).
On the other hand, the more you «sell» it with
false pretenses like «BESTSELLER», the more critically and harshly they will
read (higher expectations
are harder to meet) so you'll get less
positive reviews and shares.
I can see how it might, seemingly, improve the situation by garnering more readers (and increasing the time invested in
reading / writing), but looking at the video games industry this
is false positive.
A trace amount of protein isn't a great concern if it isn't coupled with any other symptom or test result; protein may
be present in the urine for a variety of reasons especially a
false positive reading of trace protein if the urine pH
is slightly alkaline when dipsticks
are used.
The only reason why this
is mentioned here
is because although almost all dogs that test
positive for EPI do indeed have EPI — there have
been extremely rare cases of a
false read.
Thus, in this v - d position, you can find both
false negative and (to a minor extent)
false positive readings if the position
is not ideal and other signs
are absent.
ps +
is a paid service so people have the right to complain or leave
positive feed back and all we can do
is read there post and laugh or correct them if they have error or
false information in there post.
Also, I do remember
reading and commenting on a post you had made to deltoid where you
were complaining about
being «outed» on this site, but hadn't that site in question cross-referenced IP addresses and come up with one or more
false positives?
It
is more surprising that the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles in BC actually relies upon these such tests to prohibit innocent people from driving (leading to other severe financial or life - changing repercussion) in situations where the breath testing equipment might
be in fact
reading false positives.