Sentences with phrase «be dangerous for other»

Anything from driver error to mechanical failure can be dangerous for other motorists.

AT: «So a lot of scientists, including Stephen Hawking, have said it actually might be dangerous for other civilizations out there to know that we exist.

Cutting remarks toward the deceased, whether in person or online, can be dangerous for others who are struggling with mental health and possibly considering self - harm.

There is no where in any part of Quran or Sunnah where it says people or youth are to be chained... and kept in dungeons... Thisnis ignorance, arrogance and conspiracy done by ill hearted people in the name of religion when it is by no mean a part of religion... I have seen such cases only at remote poor areas when they have mentally sick youth or people who could be dangerous for others and can not afford to hospitalize are being kept chained like that but not in religious establishments, rather at places where fraud witch doctors who claim that those are possessed...!!!

Contempt is dangerous for other reasons: disdain creates distance, and ironically that distance makes the jump to hate all too easy, particularly when red meat is served daily on radio, blogs and cable «news.»

They are dangerous for other animals, from horses and cattle to other dogs.

Not exact matches

«Any argument they make for keeping that in would result in the same kinds of legal challenges presented by Section 3 (c), which poses the question of, «Why have people from these countries been deemed more dangerous than others?»»

That's dangerous for pension funds and other large institutional investors across the world, which have been loading up on bonds, and longer - term bonds to boot.

Phishing — the other big threat to online financial security — may be even more dangerous for phones than for computers.

«Without rapid cuts in CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions, we will be heading for dangerous temperature increases by the end of this century, well above the target set by the Paris climate change agreement,» Petteri Taalas, the WMO's secretary - general, said in a statement.

Also, there is no substantial law on who can claim what objects or resources in space, beyond the 1967 Outer Space Treaty that declared space open for most kinds of exploitation, so long as «states» clean up their mess, leaving no contamination or dangerous objects that could harm others.

Recent Digital Citizens initiatives include working with state attorneys general to educate citizens about the proper disposal of opioids and other dangerous drugs, a look into how new pirate devices and apps enable hackers to infect consumers» computers, and an investigation into how millions of college emails and passwords are for sale on the Dark Web.

While the points made by these gentlemen are both valid and critically important, they fail to take note of four other dangerous subsidies: (1) the market perception that the Washington and Wall Street revolving door has rendered these firms immune from prosecution — even for repeated, illegal cartel behavior; (2) the ability to spend billions buying back their own stock, effectively propping up their own share price and bad behavior; (3) self - regulation with compromised bodies creating the market perception and reality of a competitive edge; and (4) Congress and the Supreme Court tolerating Wall Street running its own private justice system (mandatory arbitration) where corrupt acts are kept hidden from public view until they blow up into catastrophic events to the economy.

The downside is, on the other hand, that Russia is dangerous for investors which explains the low valuations along the curent political turmoil.

He is particularly dangerous, as he stands for nothing other than gaining power with no principles that can be discerned.

Believing lies causes the mind to begin to operate abnormally and to exist in a state that is not healthy and perhaps even dangerous, both for itself and for others.

It is, in other words, one of the most toxic, dangerous, and potentially fatal drugs in the entire PDR, and it has been approved for use by the FDA only for the treatment of cancer — which is to say, the dangers of this drug are so massive that they are outweighed only by the benefit of abating or curing cancer.

What is dangerous, overwhelming, trapping and other things is when one person or a group of people are expected to see vision for others.

Then there are blood tests for alcohol and other dangerous drugs.

Usually, even a non-Christian knows something about the earth, the heavens, and other elements of the world... Now it is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an unbeliever to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics... How are they going to believe these books in matters concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven?

The pontiff wrote: «The result is a dangerous dichotomy, since things can be said there that would be unacceptable in public discourse, and people look to compensate for their own discontent by lashing out at others.

But by generic group was not for mean - spiritedness, but for sanctimoniousness — something perhaps more dangerous because it may blossom through various forms of communication into mean - spiritedness in others.

consider your own logic: so here's a doctor who chooses not simply to make piles of cash in the US, but goes to the poorest continent not the planet... risking his life to work with people dying from an incredibly dangerous virus... openly admitting he is motivated by his faith in a God who didn't just risk his life, but gave it for others...

Us pagans believe we are endowed with reason which allows us to judge whether or not someone can be trusted to deliver on their promises, if they are dangerous, or harmful — by watching their behavior - We judge — not some other being upstairs - Obama has shown his lack of human compassion and untruthfulness for 4 years, we have seen that his God is re-election money and that is at who's feet he worships.

On the other hand, the failure to consider consequences can be extremely dangerous both for oneself and for others.

I have no idea how he is so high in polls, or even still in the race, but his ideas are not only dangerous for the founding principles of the US, but it is also potentially dangerous for atheists, agnostics, pagans, and others who do not believe in an Abrahamic god.

And shall not memory be able to remind him of that time when he sneaked away by underhanded means, in order to avoid a decision; of that time when he gave the matter another turn, in order to please men; of that time that he deserted his post, in order to let the storm pass over; of that time he knuckled under, in order to secure an easing off of his painful position; of that time he sought refuge and association with others — perhaps, as it is called, in order to work all the more effectively for the Good's victory, that is, in order to make his own position a little less difficult than as though at the midnight hour, somewhat terror - stricken, one stood all alone «with heavily loaded weapons at his dangerous post.»

That's when it becomes dangerous and an appeal must be made for that person to recognise hope and positivity in other people's lives so they recognise the damage that they are doing.

The Jews are willing to fight to drive others out of Jerusalem, the Christians endured dangerous pilgrimages not to worship, but to fight the Crusades to take the Holy Land for their faith, they tortured to «convert» infidels, and they fight amongst themselves (Protestant v. Catholics in N. Ireland, for instance); The Muslims declare «jihad» against their version of «infidels,» and they fight wars between Shia and Sunni over who should set the rules.

This is true for any person who believes their faith is worth killing for or the faith of others is so dangerous it should be destroyed.

It would violate standards of international law and create a dangerous precedent for other nations (China, India, Pakistan, Russia) that will decide to engage in preemptive wars that they believe are justified.

People who think they know what God wants for other people are the most dangerous people in the world.

Religion is the single most dangerous thing that has ever existed on earth and it is responsible for more death and harm to human beings than any other thing throughout history.

if they do nt follow the rules of burial it will cause turmoil on muslims, creating even more hatred, do nt just say something about burning because its forbidden for us, even the most dangerous living has his own proper burial, now because of this is just like telling no show no respect to other religion, why did your bible thought you that or it wasn, t mention in it, why you really thinks this do you think you are the only people in this world

Some Christians want to make the Bible something it isn't, and it makes for some disastrous conversations and dangerous assumptions, especially in interactions with other Christians.

Writing and speaking theologically and naming the divine seem to me a most dangerous activity, for though we are quick to see the limitations of other religious groups or theologians, we fail to recognize our own limitations.

Because the capacity for realizing positive values and the capacity for freedom or self - determination are correlative, rising in proportion with each other, creatures capable of the kinds of values we can enjoy are necessarily creatures with a very dangerous level of freedom.

If any of us cease to be sensitive to our own capacities for evil, we can become dangerous to others.

I think we should explore the possibility of making other drugs legal for this reason, but pot should be first since it is the least dangerous.

It would ne nice to accept our own moral compasses or as I put it «a morally correct manner» and then leave it at that, accept only detailed proven facts and then use your best judgment on the rest, its more likely to be right then listening or reading «facts» by those who tell you to not look for them or prove them one way r the other, that's the Fox News of the religious world... Religion is more dangerous then a blind man in a room of razors, it hurts, kills and destroys more of humanity then any «God Made» disaster.

Although some forms of the movement seem to call for a generalized trust, others are rightly concerned to direct trust toward that which is trustworthy, recognizing that many of the most powerful forces within us are dangerous.

What may be right for one person, may not be right for another and so it is in dangerous to compare yourself to others.

Support organizations can provide an educational pack of information for the parents of allergic children, which can be helpful in informing teachers and other staff about your child's needs, keeping them alert to dangerous situations that could lead to an allergic reaction.

«In addition, a KORUS withdrawal will set a dangerous precedent that calls into question other existing free trade agreements that are critical for Michigan farmers and agribusinesses at a time of low commodity prices.

But the other issue is dominance for a reason, being dangerous and also scoring more frequently out of this dominance is very important.

After getting the first yellow he should have been careful and technically should have gone but looking at it as a sensible football fan, at no time did he make a dangerous tackle or put the other player in jeopardy of a serious injury so does the premier league need players been sent off for commitment and honesty?

That last match and I think one other game is the only time I seen our players look for or find Alexis in dangerous position, no wonder he's rusty.

what is undisputably true is that we created no other clear cut chances in the game... even giroud and alexis were half chances... equally true is that walcott made zero difference and only when ox appeared did we look more dangerous... for 10 minutes... but also by withdrawing coquelin and potential danger this brough....

The debate quickly raged on Twitter with many arguing that there was no malice involved and Mane only had eyes for the ball, while others insisted that it didn't matter as it was a dangerous and reckless challenge and he deserved to see red.

Other than him Mahrez would suit us and would be a very dangerous player for us.