If your mind is not full of fear you can
be a good human being without mythology.
Not exact matches
Good could
be manufactured, packaged, shipped, and delivered to you
without a
human being ever touching them.
Space may
be the final frontier, but it
's also inaccessible (and deadly) to
human beings without a
good spacesuit.
«If we add machine learning, the field of study that allows computers to self - learn
without specific programming to do so, to existing artificial intelligence (A.I.), the resulting machines will
be better able to diagnose and heal patients than their
human counterparts can now,» he notes.
When I used to do a lot of recruiting we used to call it «hanging yourself» because people who talk for long periods of time
without seeking feedback
are generally not self - aware or
good at
human interaction.
The big news
is that Waymo's self - driving cars — previously known as Google's self - driving project — navigated public roads
without human intervention four times
better than it did last year.
Cancelling the trip would feel
good, but
is likely to hurt Ontario's economic interests
without furthering any
human rights goals.
>> >»
Humans are perfectly capable of loving others and doing
good deeds
without faith to «compel» them.»
and they disguise this by a little charity work and «spiritual guidance»
Humans are capable of
good without the powerful heirarchy declaring BS
Religions incorporated and codified these basic social values and skills, and quickly learned to take credit for them — as if,
without the religion, we would
be doomed to not have them — although we see them in every
human society, including hunter - gather tribes with no sense of gods as we understand them After many centuries of religious domination, enforced through pain of death, ostracization or other social sanctions, allowing religion to take credit, as
well as failing to question other religious claims — has become a cultural habit.
We generally like to
be good to those we feel close to, as it protects our livelihoods — Some
without reason will attribute this to God, I for one will consider it a wondrous byproduct of
human development.
Pure evil and pure
good are imagined
human concepts
without examples and
without proof.
I agree with L.Nielsen
's sentiment that you
are «almost there» — close to realising that this
is the only life you have and that all your effort should
be directed at living it
well for it
's own sake, close to realising that you
are strong enough as an individual to face the world
without the psychological crutch you call god, close to realising that you
are a
good human being in your own right, close to realising that your own successes, failures, loves and fears
are yours and yours alone, not attibutable to an imaginary creator.
The Gospel, however — the
Good News of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ,
is the astonishing announcement that God has done the whole work of reconciliation
without a scrap of
human assistance.
Humans are capable of forming ethical,
well - reasoned decisions
without needing to perpetuate such incoherent, closed - minded fantasy... I swear, christians
are among the most frightened, baby - brained people on the planet!
Without diving into wether or not animals have souls (which I don't believe) or
are even self aware (which I
'm also fairly certain they
are not), why should I compare instint, non-ceribrial behavior (at
best purely sexual) to
human?
life
is better without bullying but it
's human nature.
of course i
'm of the opinion that
without religions and god the
human race would
be a
better species but i
'm not very adamant about that
The
good news
is that God's eternal plan included a way to right these wrongs
without destroying
human freedom and even to deepen the glory and beauty of love.
The economic crisis presently
being endured in much of the West and beyond also reflects this truth: the whole meltdown in many ways had its source in that unbridled capitalism that decreed the autonomy of the individual and the moral
good of each person
being allowed to pursue wealth
without any relationship to the rest of
human society.
Production
is good: How could
humans live
without producing food, clothing, housing?
nothing makes the atheist more ticked off more than when you bring up GOD... God gets all the blame for all the tragedy in the world... If there wasnt a god in the first place,
humans would not know tragedy or injustice when we see it... it would
be a non-issue to us... survival of the fittest would not permit the emotions of love, compassion, empathy... Darwininian theory could not allow any of those and many other of the
best of people's capacity for caring to surface... You cant explain it away by synapse or neurons...
without a Supreme
Being, there would
be no sense of justice or injustice, we would not call it anything because there
is no Ultimate Moral Standard to compare it.
Without recognition of the Creator, without some apprehension of a good over-all purpose for all human beings in whatever stage of development they may be, to consider all other men as our brothers is no more than a pious
Without recognition of the Creator,
without some apprehension of a good over-all purpose for all human beings in whatever stage of development they may be, to consider all other men as our brothers is no more than a pious
without some apprehension of a
good over-all purpose for all
human beings in whatever stage of development they may
be, to consider all other men as our brothers
is no more than a pious phrase.
Good lives are made rather than found, he insists, simply because without overriding values for human life, the possibilities of a good life are highly varia
Good lives
are made rather than found, he insists, simply because
without overriding values for
human life, the possibilities of a
good life are highly varia
good life
are highly variable.
Admittedly the
best attempts to read the signs of design in creation remain
human hypotheses, subject to criticism and revision, but
without divine design there would
be neither analogous intelligence nor analogous science.
Even if this made any sense, there would
be plenty of
better eays to get across a message about who
is in contol (like creating
humans who already understand that)
without making a world in which people suffer now and can
be sent into eternal punish, ent.
It must
be soberly realized that no
human enactment, whether old or new, has advantages only and no disadvantages; that the old days
were good only for those who enjoyed the benefits of them, but not for all
without distinction and that for the most part they only begin to look splendid when they
are past and gone; that even the new age will produce tribulation, inadequacies and defects, and that the reform of the Church
is never at an end.
But these
were largely asides, and
were clearly distinguished from the discussions about what really grasped Wieman's own soul — the urgent demand that men and women commit themselves
without reservation to the process of creative interchange which creates
human good through the increase of qualitative meaning.
The Christian people suspect, and not always
without reason, that because the Church's
human law must
be established by the authorities it
is actually subject to the arbitrariness of the ministry and hence not really a law that would give the people a
well - established position over against the decisions of the Pope or the entire episcopate.
There can not
be true peace if everyone
is his own criterion, if everyone can always claim exclusively his own rights,
without at the same time caring for the
good of others, of everyone, on the basis of the nature that unites every
human being on this earth.»
Schwartz has convinced me that while we can't
be fully
human without the capacity to exercise choice, we have
better things to do than ponder alternatives.
For another, the
best way to double
human brain power
without increasing the population
is to free women to develop and use their minds.
Can we reconceive theological education in such a way that (1) it clearly pertains to the totality of
human life, in the public sphere as
well as the private, because it bears on all of our powers; (2) it
is adequate to genuine pluralism, both of the «Christian thing» and of the worlds in which the «Christian thing»
is lived, by avoiding naiveté about historical and cultural conditioning
without lapsing into relativism; (3) it can
be the unifying overarching goal of theological education
without requiring the tacit assumption that there
is a universal structure or essence to education in general, or theological inquiry in particular, which inescapably denies genuine pluralism by claiming to
be the universal common denominator to which everything may
be reduced as variations on a theme; and (4) it can retrieve the strengths of both the «Athens» and the «Berlin» types of excellent schooling,
without unintentionally subordinating one to the other?
None of the goods
humans cherish, including the free exercise of religion, can flourish
without a measure of civic peace and security If evil
is permitted to grow,
good goes into hiding.
Without God, without the one whose death on the cross challenges all our good feelings, who stands beyond and over against our human anxieties, all we have left is sentiment, a saccharine residue of theism in
Without God,
without the one whose death on the cross challenges all our good feelings, who stands beyond and over against our human anxieties, all we have left is sentiment, a saccharine residue of theism in
without the one whose death on the cross challenges all our
good feelings, who stands beyond and over against our
human anxieties, all we have left
is sentiment, a saccharine residue of theism in demise.
Human love
without celibacy
is at
best mere sentiment, at worst a form of idolatry.
For we shall then
be all too likely to dismiss death as a mere incident, to think of judgment
without due seriousness, and to regard heaven and hell (our possible
human destiny, for
good or for ill) as nothing more than «fairy - tale» talk.
«
Good»
is the movement in the direction of home, «evil»
is the aimless whirl of
human potentialities
without which nothing can
be achieved and by which, if they take no direction but remain trapped in themselves, everything goes awry.
Well said you got it dead right, I have no time for the father but the son
is without doubt a vile excuse for a
human being,
Without a culture we would simply cease to
be human, and what our particular culture holds to
be good, true, and beautiful
are what we as
humans by and large also find to
be good, true and beautiful.
Human rights
are expected to
be looked after by the general growth process in the economy,
without a direct effort to bring about a
better redistribution of incomes and wealth.
The freedom to
be a
good, moral, ethical and loving
human without the threat of eternal punishment will bring true and honest happiness.
However, despite
being the head of a historically corrupt and often evil organization, this Pope appears to
be a
good human being (which you'll find most atheists aspire to
without the threat of eternal damnation.
By extension every
good deed, every struggle for justice and deliverance from oppression, every effort to care for and show concern about those who
are in need, will
be not merely a reflection of the divine mercy and righteousness but also an instrument for the bringing about of just such shalom or «abundance of life» for God's
human children, So one might go on, almost
without ceasing, to show that response in faith to the action of God in this vivid moment has its implications and applications for the whole range of
human life and experience.
However, if he remains true to his Divine Will as reflected in the Law, it will not
be sufficient for him to raise up religious truth in a sporadic fashion
without any line of direction or fulfilment: «if God
is the Environer of the soul of man, then from the very beginning of man there must
be, within his personality and within the complex of
human society a God - evoked and God directed line of spiritual truth, and
good, and spiritual authority».
humans are not all hedonists, even
without a magical man in the sky who apparently said what
is good and what
is bad
Thus, for all he shows to the contrary, the only thing in our concept of
human knowledge that derives from our direct intuition of God
is the idea of totality or all - inclusiveness, just as he himself allows that we can very
well experience «the inclusive something»
without experiencing it as «an inclusive experience» (1948, 39f.).
It certainly casts him as a very
human figure which
is good to see as many Christians tend cast him as a hero of the bible
without flaws and shortcomings.
By «perspective» I mean the realization that things will never
be perfect In this world, that the ultimate
good is unobtainable, that there
is no such thing as a
human cause or
human institution
without error and sinfulness, that only God deserves our ultimate loyalty.
Though it
is not
without effort on the
human side, it
is not due to a manipulation of feelings or to
good works, but to the grace of God accepted in grateful fidelity.