Sentences with phrase «be the best man possible»

Be the best man possible and use this new supplement.

Be the best man possible when you use Magnumax Pills.

This supplement gives you a massive surge of energy and confidence to be the best man possible!

Not exact matches

First is that you just want to run your idea by as many people as possible, and women may very well have a different perspective on it than men.

We took a deep dive into Le Mans, Grand - Am, Nascar... and whenever possible, the best practice was adopted.

Then suddenly in the early 1900s, many men started to switch to safety razors, and in more recent times, disposable and cartridge razors as the market has become saturated with a variety of razors claiming to be able to provide the best possible shave.

It may be silly, but then getting paid minimum wage to read books when one is 18 years old ain't a bad gig, and this man and the library he led and the town which made this library possible are irreplaceable factors in both making and preserving important things like the opportunity to read good (or not so good) books in quiet solitude.

Nietzsche's scorn for «modern ideas» made a profound impression on his admirers: «This book [Beyond Good and Evil],» he said, «is a criticism of modernity, embracing the modern sciences, arts, even politics, together with certain indications as to a type that would be the reverse of modern man, for as little like him as possible: a noble, yea - saying man.»

They were chosen by men to be the best possible fit.

Brian what is impossible for man is possible to God you may feel that you cant and that is a good starting part tell God that and then rely on the holy spirit to do what you cant because in him we can do all things.God loves you no matter what you have done look at paul he killed Christians murdered them and God forgave him was it hard for him i would expect so the guilt of his past must have affected him somehow.But it did nt stop him from moving forward.

It is theoretically possible to be a good man without participation in the life of a religious community, but in practice the difficulties are enormous.

That, I maintain, is not possible without a restored sense of sexual identity; a sense of what it means to be a man, what it means to be a woman, what it can mean to show together a better image of God.

Once you embrace the idea that there is no possible way for anyone to know any truth beyond what they have been taught, you can focus on what really matters; helping your fellow man, making the world a better place than how you found it and teaching your kids to do the same.

But a Christian reading of process - philosophy could very well make its own the words of the Psalmist, «God maketh even the wrath of man» — and the maladjustment and failure in nature too, we might add — «to turn to his praise» — which is to say, to be mysteriously transmuted into opportunities and occasions for the realization of possible goods.

If Jesus did not rise, then we are left with Christianity being just another man - made world religion which tries to help people live life as best as possible, and I am convinced that despite all the troubles within Christianity, it provides the best solutions to all of life's questions and problems.

Buber does not start from some external, absolutely valid ethical code which man is bound to apply as best as possible to each new situation.

Precisely that kind of man, «transported by his passion» — in this case his being caught up into a relationship with God in Christ, although it may very well be true in other ways as well, since to be «transported» by passion is to enter upon the most profound experience possible to human beings — precisely such a man does feel and know what is nothing other than «the secret of the universe».

«It is not possible to make good men and good women without an element of transcendence and grace,» wrote Malcolm Muggeridge — British scholar, journalist and Christian.

O when one beholds a man who protests that he has entirely understood how Christ went about in the form of a lowly servant, poor, despised, and, as the Scripture says, spat upon — when I see the same man so careful to betake himself thither where in a worldly sense it is good to be, and accommodate himself there in the utmost security, when I see him apprehensive of every puff of wind from right or left, as though his life depended upon it, and so blissful, so utterly blissful, so awfully glad — yes, to make the thing complete, so awfully glad that he is able to thank God for it — glad that he is held in honor by all men — then I have often said to myself and by myself, «Socrates, Socrates, Socrates, can it be possible that this man has understood what he says he has understood?»

This makes it possible for us to understand Christian worship as the culmination of all of man's striving to find a satisfactory way of integration with his God, completing and correcting the many attempts which may be seen as foreshadowings of the «good thing» which was to come.

The moralism which makes possible such a neat separation between good and evil men, and which implies subtly that we who make the distinction are to be counted among the good can not be refuted by argument.

So Niebuhr advised: «If it is not possible for modern man to hold by faith that there is a larger meaning in the intricate patterns of history than those which his own virtues or skills supply, he would do well to emphasize fortune and caprice in his calculations.»

The well - known phrase «impossible possibility» stands here in Niebuhr's thought for the warning that the pure love of God transcends human possibility.17 At the same time an element of uncalculating sacrificial giving of the self to the good of the other is possible for man.

Only the man whose hope can stand the defeat of any particular project is free to hope «for all things,» that is, for whatever good may really be possible under God.

This rescue effort was not for him to toss some teaching our way and hope we would live better lives, but rather Gods rescue effort is that he came down himself to communicate in the most clear form possible his intentions and desires, and to make a sacrificial provision for pardon for mans crimes against God.

Best Response: Gina Dalfonzo with «Guarding Your Marriage Without Dissing Women» ``... Instead of viewing the women in their world as potential problems to be avoided as much as possible, and viewing themselves as explosives wired to go off if the heat gets too high, Christian men might want to try something different.

Biblical faith could be the only connection to God because of the equivocal understanding of God's being and man's being, and the conclusion that it was not possible for man to do anything good or positive in any way without subtracting somehow from the power and glory of God.

She threw up her hands at one well - known literary critic, wondering, «Can it be possible that a man with this much learning knows so little about Christianity?»

For here one can experience everything possible, or that everything is possible, even what the inexperienced man would least believe, that the Good sits highest at the dinner table and crime next highest, or crime highest and the Good next highest — in good company with each otGood sits highest at the dinner table and crime next highest, or crime highest and the Good next highest — in good company with each otGood next highest — in good company with each otgood company with each other.

Or, if we are to give the widest possible interpretation to the definition of the religious life by calling it the quest for the good life, we should surely include in a description of this quest, as it undoubtedly has accompanied man through his history, a reference to man's recognition of those factors and elements in his and nature's life which clearly transcend his or its making and control.

The Christian is a citizen of two cities, that of God, which in the Church is partially realized; and that of Man, in which he must strive for the relative good which is possible in the realm of space and time.

Put a man in Sarah's place, let him know that in case he were to love a girl a spirit of hell would come and murder his loved one — it might well be possible that he would choose the demoniacal part, that he would shut himself up within himself and say in the way a demoniacal nature talks in secret, «Many thanks, I am no friend of courteous and prolix phrases, I do not absolutely need the pleasure of love, I can become a Blue Beard, finding my delight in seeing maidens perish during the night of their nuptials.»

«Listener to the Christian message, «2 occasional preacher, 3 dialoguer with biblical scholars, theologians, and specialists in the history of religions, 4 Ricoeur is above all a philosopher committed to constructing as comprehensive a theory as possible of the interpretation of texts.5 A thoroughly modern man (if not, indeed, a neo-Enlightenment figure) in his determination to think «within the autonomy of responsible thought, «6 Ricoeur finds it nonetheless consistent to maintain that reflection which seeks, beyond mere calculation, to «situate [us] better in being, «7 must arise from the mythical, narrative, prophetic, poetic, apocalyptic, and other sorts of texts in which human beings have avowed their encounter both with evil and with the gracious grounds of hope.

So if the only standard is a baptized man in good standing with the church, there are millions of possible papal successors — including Speaker of the House John Boehner, rock star Bono and, yes, comedian Stephen Colbert.

For if, e. g., a man loses consciousness as soon as his brain is injured, it is clearly as good an explanation to say the injury to the brain destroyed the mechanism by which the manifestation of the consciousness was rendered possible, as to say that it destroyed the seat of consciousness.

Even if it were possible to replace fathers with government supports, better - paying jobs for single mothers, day care and elaborate social and extended - family networks, it would be unhealthy for both men and society to have increasing numbers of single men adrift without connections to families.

Wonder if that could happen in Islam although know it is well regulated where no will is needed to divide among those next of kin family... but what I mean is whether if is possible for a man or woman give up their whole wealth for charities depriving those who would inherit??

God could had it been both ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

Above all, it is possible to exhaust what the gospel has to say by talking about and working for the immediacies, assuming that there is in that gospel nothing more than an imperative for better relations among men, classes, races, and nations, with the building in the not too distant future of a society in which opportunity of fulfillment will be guaranteed to everybody.

God could had creation either ways is possible for him... created of all livings from chemicals to full creatures... in the book if looked so simple is because God message was to people with less knowldge premitive whether in the east or west... and had to be in simple examples but that might hold big meanings in today's knowldge and facilities... about mankind God created at it's best, but never in the Quran it was stated that men had been given his (God's) looks... God told us that all creatures are nations like us, which means they were created in the same way... although God as well spoke of integration of mankind and well as animals in cross marriages that made variable nations...

Men in such times and places have to make difficult choices, and not every good thing is possible.

In a letter to Thomas Cromwell he showed he was as good as the next man at saying little in the nicest possible way.

how a man rose from the dead and was not a zombie... how supposed humans started from a brother and sister committing incest but no birth defects occurred... the more educated the masses get in science the more u know these things are possible no matter how much «FAITH» u have or how many times u rewrite the good books

Since the initial aim is at the best possible fulfillment beyond man's powers to understand, and since man's exercise of freedom seems only to lead to a deviation away from this ideal possibility, there is some prima facie support for this view.

how is it possible that an all - knowing, perfect imaginary man in the sky can create anything that he declares good... only to become displeased when his creation fails?

Among them were pantheism and the positions that human reason is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood and good and evil; that Christian faith contradicts reason; that Christ is a myth; that philosophy must be treated without reference to supernatural revelation; that every man is free to embrace the religion which, guided by the light of reason, he believes to be true; that Protestantism is another form of the Christian religion in which it is possible to be as pleasing to God as in the Catholic Church; that the civil power can determine the limits within which the Catholic Church may exercise authority; that Roman Pontiffs and Ecumenical Councils have erred in defining matters of faith and morals; that the Church does not have direct or indirect temporal power or the right to invoke force; that in a conflict between Church and State the civil law should prevail; that the civil power has the right to appoint and depose bishops; that the entire direction of public schools in which the youth of Christian states are educated must be by the civil power; that the Church should be separated from the State and the State from the Church; that moral laws do not need divine sanction; that it is permissible to rebel against legitimate princes; that a civil contract may among Christians constitute true marriage; that the Catholic religion should no longer be the religion of the State to the exclusion of all other forms of worship; and «that the Roman Pontiff can and should reconcile himself to and agree with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.»

Man is «caught in a sinful situation,» in which «the best that is possible falls far short of the glory of God and is, in that sense, sinful.»

But fundamentally we may say that it is good news in all human situations because in one way or another it delivers man from some form of bondage and frees him for the fullest possible life.

Man is to reflect a character of work and care as if he was working onto the Lord this means doing the best possible for all concerned.

People it's best to try and be as righteous as humanly possible being the flesh we are, from Adam, Seth, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Moses, David & Jesus etc, were all righteous not religious men of God.