It is pushing for new oil and gas drilling in polar
bear habitat while biologists for Interior Department, prodded by legal action, recommended the bear be given threatened status under the species act because of the warming of the Arctic and summer retreat of sea ice.
Not exact matches
While keeping the rule — which limits use of the Endangered Species Act to curb emissions of greenhouse gases — Salazar held open the possibility of adding
habitat protections for the polar
bear later.
Here's where the rubber hits the road: even
while the Interior Department was slowly taking steps to give these
bears ESA protection, the Bush Administration opened almost 30 million acres of polar
bear habitat to oil and gas exploration, a move that by their own admission threaten polar
bears.
As examples, a reduced and thinning ice cover will disadvantage polar
bears,
while sea otters will have new
habitats; communities on new shipping routes will grow
while those built on permafrost will have difficulties.
«Polar
bears are sticking to using the same type of
habitat conditions even
while sea ice disappears,» says lead author Ryan Wilson of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
While direct brutality by humans is horrifying enough, the damages we have done to the polar
bear and its
habitat from afar through anthropogenic climate change are surely far more terrible.
• reducing the risk of major killers like heart disease, stroke and cancers
while cutting exposure to food
borne pathogens; • offering a viable answer to feeding the world's hungry, through more efficient use of grains and other crops; • saving animals from suffering in factory farm conditions and from painful slaughter; • conserving vital, but limited freshwater, fertile topsoil and other precious resources; • preserving irreplaceable ecosystems, such as rainforests and other wildlife
habitats; • mitigating the ever - expanding environmental pollution of animal agriculture; and the list goes on.