As a result of snow depth variations, polar
bear hunting success and cub survival can fluctuate rather dramatically, which in turn can cause the subpopulation size to fluctuate as well.
It seems very odd to me that Pagano and colleagues suggested no reasons for the unexpectedly poor showing of polar
bear hunting success during their study except a bit of hand - waving about higher - than - we - thought metabolic rates in the bears.
Not exact matches
The team recaptured the
bears between eight and 11 days later, used the blood chemistry results to measure metabolic rate and compared it with the
bears» activity and
hunting success.
And «polar
bears are dying out» when the Inuit were claiming
success for the
hunting ban.
The fact that spring mean snow depth of 50 cm or more was reported for four years in the 1960s, and one year in the 1970s (Ferguson et al. 2005: Fig. 2a) suggests that polar
bear may have had an equally poor
hunting success in those years as well — it just wasn't documented, as far as I know.
Snow depth over sea ice in spring affects the
hunting success of polar
bears on ringed seal (Phoca hispida) pups, but the relationship is more complicated than you might think and there is less data on this phenomenon than you would believe.
«Using video collar data, we documented
bears»
hunting behavior and foraging
success.
«As the area of sea ice that polar
bears can use for
hunting declines, progressively fewer seals are accessible to the
bears, and therefore the
bears»
hunting success likely declines as well.»