«Keep in mind that you don't want to keep
beating a dead horse if you would be happy going back to what you were doing before.»
Not exact matches
I thought I was
beating a
dead horse but I can continue
if you like.
I'm probably
beating a
dead horse on this one... You're correct in that it doesn't imply the non-existece of god, but
if that's the only argument / evidence for god, then your case isn't very strong.
I've already talked about my favorite shoes in a previous post, so in an effort to not
beat a
dead horse, click the link
if you want to hear more about those!
If you allow me to
beat the comparative
dead horse once more, I swooned over Juno, and kept waiting for Young Adult to win me over in somewhat the same manner.
On the other hand, don't
beat a
dead horse:
if books 1 and 2 don't do it for you, even after you've given it time, don't feel obliged to get more books in the series out.
Not to
beat the resloution
horse dead,
if I haven't already, but Titanfall on Xbox One runs at 792p -LRB-?)
To
beat a
dead horse,
if the model didn't match with hindcasting we wouldn't use it and would re-evaluate it to the point that it does match hindcasting.
This is perhaps
beating a
dead horse, or flogging a
dead CRU study, but,
if I might quote Richard Feynman in his famous «Cargo - Cult» address at CalTech's graduation ceremonies in 1973:
You've already heard me say
if you don't have clients you aren't a successful attorney, so I won't
beat a
dead horse.