Not exact matches
Because of James Cameron's involvement and its huge box - office gross, «Avatar» probably had these nominations in the bag before any
Academy voter even saw the movie.
Though it didn't make the final cut for Best Foreign Language Film at this year's Oscars (probably
because the source material was a little too lighthearted for those misery - loving
Academy voters), «The Intouchables» is one of the most crowd - pleasing movies that I've seen all year, boasting an infectious charm that had me grinning from ear to ear.
Because while one is accustomed to the mercurial whims of the
Academy voters, the total exclusion of JC Chandor's period thriller seems nonsensical in the extreme.
(One
Academy voter recently admitted, anonymously, to having rejected Get Out, Jordan Peele's deeply innovative and urgently important Best Picture contender, out of hand — precisely
because, the
voter groused, «as far as I'm concerned, they played the race card.»)
This year, these two slots could be taken up by Unbroken and American Sniper
because inside the insular world of
Academy voters, with only five slots for nominating, and not the freedom of ten, they tend to «vote with their heart.»
Because she is still the old white
Academy voter's favourite, precocious granddaughter.
Historically,
academy voters have often preferred the non-auteur directors, perhaps
because these filmmakers seem to be more collaborative, working closely with writers, actors and other crew members rather than running a one - man show.
Here's hoping Oscar
voters have a long memory for next year's
Academy Awards,
because if The Upside of Anger had been released three months ago, Joan Allen would have given Hilary Swank a run for her gold.
But then either reality struck or I lost my nerve, or both,
because obviously any number of
voters and critics in any number of precursors weren't as persuaded as I. (The fact that
Academy voters have to see all the nominees might make a difference, but I doubt «Water» went entirely unseen by the precursor
voters either.)
Manchester by the Sea was a hit with
Academy voters because of its general critical acclaim, but that wasn't the only reason it did well with them — it also seemed like a real movie that the general public was excited to go see, rather than add to their watch queues at home.
Given that some
Academy voters said prior to the ceremony that they hadn't even watched Get Out
because they didn't consider it a contender, there were some fears that the landmark film would be completely snubbed.
It takes more than that, and some impossible - to - measure percentage of
Academy voters ultimately supported Moonlight precisely
because they knew it would irritate Trump.
by John Villeneuve Generally, it is difficult to surmise what the
academy voters will choose amongst the foreign films submitted to them,
because, more often than not, they pick films without controversy, without edge, and without...
The
Academy is undergoing growing pains of its own, after adding more
voters because of #OscarsSoWhite.
That's
because the studios wait until the Holiday Season to release their best films in theaters, given how
Academy voters tend to forget pictures and performances from earlier in the year.
Obviously, we now know perhaps more than we want to about the more human side of the
academy, but
because the
voters can be unpredictable I continue to be curious about what they will choose.
However, most
Academy voters are just like you and me, and they'll choose the film
because silly - looking pirates and talking polar bears don't stand a chance against giant f ****** robots!
Eager to piece together any reason for the lack of a clear frontrunner for this year's Oscar race, Variety's Peter Bart has put out a thesis: it's
because movie critics like bummer movies that
Academy voters don't.
That said, the critics and the
Academy have still been overlapping more of late
because of the shrinking selection of the kinds of movies that Oscar
voters like.