We went to this region
because GMO corn is banned, therefore the risk of cross contamination from GMO corn is much lower.
These can cause allergic responses
because GMO's increase allergies and growth hormones fed to cows increase inflammation markers in humans.
Love these tortillas, more so
because their GMO free, corn and flour are made from corn and wheat which come from GMO.
Because GMOs aren't always labeled as such, you often can't protect yourself from the iffy ingredients sneaking their way into your favorite snacks and beverages.
«
Because GMOs are not labeled in the U.S., they might be causing acute or chronic effects,» Hirshberg has also written.
Likewise, a liberal with distrust of big business is inclined to oppose genetically modified organisms, not necessarily because of evidence, but
because GMOs are often developed and sold by big corporations, which are seen as incongruent with egalitarian and communitarian mindset.
Not exact matches
Since then the government has banned virtually all
GMO seeds in China
because of public fear.
They tell food manufacturers, grocery stores, and restaurants to segregate
GMOs, and ultimately not to sell them,
because people like you won't buy them.
Metropolis Farms» technology is patented
because Griffin does not want anyone abusing the technology and producing sub-standard food or creating
GMOs.
I love to use Vega One Chocolate in this recipe
because it adds such a great flavor and has zero strange ingredients, fillers,
GMOs, or added sugars of any kind.
Aside from the fact that Kellogg's has spent millions of dollars ensuring
GMO foods are not labelled (
because they use them in their products), they also use high fructose corn syrup, which is linked to a number of diseases and health problems.
I do prefer using Polaner all fruit for this dressing
because it is non
GMO and refined sugar free (sweetened with fruit juice).
I suspect a lot of people in the US who are not coeliac but have problems when they eat wheat may not actually be gluten intolerant but have problems
because of the
GMO and pesticide and so might actually be able to eat organic wheat.
Factory farmed meats on the other hand have a higher ratio of omega - 6s which can cause inflammation
because the animals are usually fed grains like
GMO corn and soy.
Down to Earth is opposed to the development of products containing
GMOs because we believe they may pose health, safety, and other potential risks that far outweigh the purported benefits.
It's funny
because you always hear about how bad
GMO soy, corn and wheat are for us (which they are) but those crops are mainly grown to feed the animals.
Easy Salad Dressing for Two — It is very important for your health that you make your own salad dressings
because the ones in the store are full of rancid oils, sweeteners and
GMO ingredients like soybean / canola oil and high fructose corn syrup.
Hi Alice;) So nice you found me and thanks so much for visiting and writing a comment;) I love this Gea brand and I really support European product —
because it doesn't have the bs of
gmo's and toxins that North American products have.
Organic means the product is healthy, wholesome, flavorful and rich in nutrients,
because it's free of harmful chemicals and genetically modified organisms (
GMOs).
Because of its pro-biotech policy,
GMO lobbyists are promoting the Philippine biosafety policy as model in the ASEAN countries.
In order to find a consistent supply of corn that tested negative for both
GMO and glyphosate contamination, we began searching in Mexico, where commercial
GMO corn production is currently banned
because of the rich genetic diversity and cultural significance that corn has there.
Just
because the jar says it contains an all - natural peanut butter doesn't mean it is organic or
GMO free.
non
GMO, Casein FREE, Lactose FREE, Hormone FREE Cold processed to maintain protein integrity No soy or other additives We use only Premium ingredients
because we believe our customer's bodies deserve the best.
And
because these products are always sourced from organic,
GMO - free plants, they will even be allowable by the most dedicated raw food practitioner.
Truvia, PureVia, Stevia in the Raw — These are the types of stevia to avoid
because of the extensive processing and added
GMO ingredients.
If you've ever gotten in trouble for coming home with almond milk instead of cow milk, and if you favor labeling food containing
GMOs because of your right to know, you are going to love Missouri House Bill 2607.
Worst of all, President Bush (George Herbert Walker, not his son) signed an executive order stating that no safety studies are needed on
GMOs because the food producer bears ultimate responsibility «for assuring safety.»
Because of consumer demand across North America, Non-
GMO Project Verified products remain one of the fastest growing sectors in the marketplace and the Butterfly is the most trusted label for
GMO avoidance among shoppers today.
Of those, we have included the following in our surveillance program, either
because they will likely soon be widespread or
because of known instances of contamination from
GMOs.
And
because we no longer use corn in our feed, due to the presence of
GMOs and herbicides even in USDA organic corn, this will result in very light colored yolks during the winter months.
These ingredients have been chosen
because they are produced from plant crops that are known to be at risk of
GMO contamination.
Producing hand - made, all natural Pressés and Cordials, Belvoir's 100 percent natural, gluten - free,
GMO free and vegan drinks are exceptionally special
because of the infusion of the ancient British blossom, elderflower, in its recipes.
I don't care if Welch's is using real fruit juice
because they are also adding corn syrup (
GMO ingredient), artificial colors, as well as natural and artificial flavorings (unknown ingredients).
The Butterfly is North America's most trusted seal for
GMO avoidance
because of our rigorous Standard which requires ongoing testing, traceability and segregation of major high - risk ingredients.
I'm already boycotting so much
because of gluten,
GMO's, Manufacturers, etc..
I know that you probably just posted a picture of Quaker Oats
because it is a well know brand, but I've actually heard that Quaker Oats use
GMO oats.
Because the SNA is similiar to the GMA — they want to sell their processed,
GMO - laden food to schools and profit.
These 108 counts of natural diaper can be yours for only $ 42.74 and after your baby use it night, you won't feel any guilt for throwing it away
because it is made from
GMO - free corn and can still be recycled.
«We knew organic mattered
because it meant our products were made without the use of toxic persistent pesticides or
GMO's.
Recent reports of secret meetings among industry reps and the Food and Drug Adminstration over
GMO labeling piqued my interest, mostly
because this critical aspect was missing: any effort to label GE foods at the federal level could bring the current grassroots movement to a grinding halt by preventing any stronger local laws from ever being enacted.
If this was 1970 that would probably still be ok
because they used normal food products back then but today, no way!!!!! All they would be serving up is
GMO garbage.
Because they are natural, as in FROM THE EARTH not from a manufacturing process and the use of
GMO's.
HFCS can not be considered an «all natural» product
because it is HIGHLY processed and contains at least one
GMO (Genetically Modified) enzyme (used during processing).
«
GMO is very controversial
because people argue about the definition,» Cuomo said.
Jansson told Science that
because the plant they ate was by definition not a
GMO, «we do of course not need to ask for a permit or even inform them.»
«However, genome editing raises a regulatory issue by creating indistinct boundaries in
GMO regulations
because the advanced genetic engineering can, without introducing new genetic material, make a gene modification which is similar to a naturally occurring mutation.»
Although I reluctantly agree with the editors that mandatory
GMO labeling is bad policy, I'm certain that fighting disclosure is not where the scientific community should be putting its energy — especially
because it's very likely that North America will soon be swamped by the pro-labeling tide that has already swept across Europe, Asia and much of the rest of the world.
In that spirit, the recent editorial from the Scientific American board of editors opposing mandatory labeling of
GMO foods was disappointing
because it was, in my view, another missed opportunity to start laying down some much clearer lines of demarcation.
But the coercion of mandatory labeling ought to be reserved for information that is relevant to health, not
GMO content,
because government - sponsored assessments have repeatedly concluded that approved
GMOs are at least as safe and nutritious as their conventionally bred counterparts.
Such scaremongering is especially painful to me
because even though I do not think that government - approved
GMO foods pose meaningful health risks to consumers, and even though I believe strategic genetic engineering can be an important tool to ease human suffering on our warming and resource - constrained planet, I share the concerns of many environmentalists about the homogenization and consolidation of the global food system — trends that are accelerated by the spread of industrially produced
GMOs.