Sentences with phrase «because lacazette»

Furthermore in this section, the ESPN writer claims that because Lacazette has a higher total number of goals in the last 3 years, he is the better striker.

Maybe because lacazette is better.

It would be a waste of chance and money, because Lacazette has amazing skills and finishing ability, as seen on his YouTube videos.

Why is said this is because Lacazette was bought to play with Sanchez and Ozil, so if Sanchez decides to leave then Swapping with Aguero would be a Massive attack for Us.

And because Lacazette wasn't included in the Euro squad (which was strange), doesn't necessarily mean he's inferior to Giroud.

Lyon can not really bluff or insist too strongly on getting Olivier Giroud as part of the deal because Lacazette was going to sign for Atletico Madrid before they were hit with a transfer ban so we know that he is available.

Just a pity that Aubameyang can't play because Lacazette's desire last night was disgusting.

Unless he is planned to replace Ozil, Arsenal should have focused on more physically imposing attackers like Aubameyang and Draxler, because Lacazette is struggling with Wenger's system.

It is okay if Aubameyang and Dortmund change their minds, because Lacazette can still work well with Giroud, but Arsenal should get a more tenacious central midfielder and a better central defender.

That is kind of understandable because Lacazette is a rival for Giroud's first team role but all players want to win things as well as play.

Problem is even if we go to the next round we still won't have either Lacazette or Aubameyang because Lacazette is out for 6 weeks minimum and Aubameyang is cup tied as long as BoRussia Dortmund is still in the competition (i think).

IMO we should have taken a gamble on that Ben Yedder kid but it's too late now as he has signed for Sevilla, so we need to get Mustafi or Koulibaby or Manolas plus Mahrez and Lacazette that's if we are serious about challenging for both the UCL and the League because Lacazette alone will not be enough for us we need goals from all our front 3's.

Because Lacazette often lost in the air, like our previous small strikers, Podolski and Perez.

It could prove to be a huge decision as well, because Lacazette was struggling for goals before his long spell on the sidelines and his confidence suffered accordingly.

Because Lacazette, Giroud and Welbeck are not consistent enough.

That said, I'd rather add some attacking threat to our impotent attack, because Lacazette can not do it alone up front.

Not exact matches

Lacazette scored against Sevilla, because Welbeck missed the ball when shooting.

Okay If we are getting Lacazette, Mahrez AND Mbappe then I'm okay with us selling to City because we will be good enough to win the title.

As for Giroud I hope what I'm hearing is not true.You get the feeling that once Lacazette starts scoring he just won't like it.He's also another overrated player who's also hear because of Wenger's kindness.Apart from the fact that he's good with his head I don't see the positives of keeping here and even Welbeck.We need players who can push Lacazette to perform and these are just not the players.They are more of rotation players.Do you think if Welbeck and Giroud were at top form they can challenge Laca at his best?I always laugh at our strikers though.On one hand, one doesn't fit our style of play but at least he can finish.On the other hand, the one who fits our style of play can't even score a goal.I can't believe we are joking with such a crucial role.I'm sick and tired of seeing average strikers in the club.It's been painful watching the likes of Bendtner and Chamakh already.Now I have to cope with this.

The report quotes a «source» who said: «Lacazette was followed because he was top scorer in French football — but a lot of his goals were penalties [10 of his 27 goals last season came from the spot].

one, the deal isn't done yet because Wenger is still haggling the price of the player and two, All the main media reports were already stating that Arsenal were deep in negotiations for Lacazette, long before Beavers and Butthead Came along, blowing his own trumpet.

Giroud is of course insecure because the last thing he wants is Lacazette replacing him in the French starting 11 in a world cup year through his own club.

im not to sure about sterling because im on the idea to take a striker first, like lacazette and play in the wing ox, welbeck, walcott, chuba or maybe campbell or wellington (probably i would sell the last one... al of u try him like a star when he is not younger than campbell and he did nt do anything, for me he is not on the standard)... BUT u cant said that walcott is the best winger in the league when he is fit.

Last summer, he wouldn't pay the correct valuation for Lacazette (and signed Perez who we've hardly seen) and now there is a realistic chance that he won't come to Arsenal because of the chaos at our club and because we potentially will not finish in the top four.

and english players are the if we analyze the salary to performance... a garbage rooney has been earning 300k for... basically NOTHING, it is annoying but its because of you people that some managers do nt like to spend a lot of money... if lacazette came for 60 mio pounds and on 150k and if he flopped you would bash and reiterate that ON EVERY SECOND ARTICLE!!

Lacazette will really suit our style of play as well, because we thrive on pace, and movement, something Giroud just can not give us.

From the look of the starting line - up selected buy the manager, though, I think he may have been overstating that case, because we have no Lacazette in the team and Wenger has also named two holding midfielders in Coquelin and Xhaka.

«I'm not tempted [to play Alexis, Ozil and Alex Lacazette] because I have another trio who will play on Thursday night, like Walcott, Wilshere and Giroud.

Not saying he's ready, just that other than Lacazette if the ball fell kindly to him he knows how to strike it, and he's another one of those who can be hard to pick up because he's looking for half a yard over his man or he's looking for a rebound.

I would like to stress out once more that a player of Lacazette's or better caliber won't be signed for Arsenal, firstly because the club isn't going to spend much over the 40 million pounds limit.

Previously they just signed Lacazette and Kolasinac, even tough the team needs more high quality additions, because they could not get rid of the fringe players quicker.

Yea, that's a right attitude from Lacazette it shows how intelligent he is... the team should come first and if we can stay solid at the back, it will really make a difference because we will score at least a goal...

Seriously, yes if Lacazette and Aubameyang both got seriously injured or long ban from playing BUT it could be short lived because in such a case we would sign another striker.

• Giroud chosen over Lacazette because I expect opposition to defend deep so less space to run into which is what Lacazette needs.

A lot of people don't really blame Lacazette for missing the chance at the end because there is a reason he is out of confidence.

When Lacazette recovers his confidence in front of goal, which will inevitably happen because he is a class player, Konstantin will assure us that it is despite the manager.

I suggested prior to the game a line up: Cech Mustafi, Mertesacker, Koscielny Ox, Xhaka, Ramsey, Kosalinac Özil, Lacazette, Sanchez Because: Holding was poor and cost us.

So yes, Arsenal should have sold him, because they already have an upgrade, Lacazette.

Just a pity that Danny went off later, because then it would've been Alexis Iwobi Lacazette.

I prefer a complete striker like belotti, lukaku, and morata to lacazette or griezmann because they are fast, have good movement and positioning, can head the ball, and they are strong as well.

People on this forum kept on saying that giroud is better than Lacazette because he was called to the national team.

he is not desperate for success, if he was desperate to succeed he would have pressure the board to back him heavily in the transfer market, that's if they are not already backing him, because I seriously doubt our transfer budget was just 46 million that we spent on lacazette, because kolasinac was a free transfer, not forgetting we sold players like Gibbs and chamberlain but still can't buy players to strengthen our squad

If he plays Lacazette out of position then it's because this is what he does, play everybody out of position.

If Arsenal want to get Malcom, maybe because they want another French speaking player to communicate better with Lacazette and he is also a left footer.

Lacazette really struggled against Chelsea because he had very little support.

Really hope lacazette doesn't turn into a 50mil flop because Wenger doesn't want to play to suit him.

-- Lacazette: He should be able to get the ball from the midfield, because he doesn't get enough supply.

Aubameyang would be isolated like Lacazette, because he can not drop deep to get the ball from the midfield like Sanchez, Hazard, Salah, Mane, Neymar or Messi.

Saying Lacazette is all wrong because he's not a complete striker, again this just sounds stupid.

lacazette if he comes will easily be our pk taker because he is damn good at it.