Should we assume that leading edge climate science fails somehow
because Mosh says it does?
Not exact matches
Skipping to around before the show (
because there were five other bands... and to to time constraints, I will mention at a later time...), at that point I was honestly quite excited for the show all in all; it was great once the band members and Phil got on stage they started playing «Oblivious Maximus» the first song of their first studio album «Use Once And Destroy» the minute that song kicked off the
Mosh Pit started... it was awesome!!
In addition the measurement is non-trivial,
because as
Mosh has tirelessly pointed out, the act of spectroscopically measuring thermal radiation is dependent on a model of the radiative properties of the atmosphere.
@manacker: «As I pointed out to
Mosh, Vaughan's analysis is basically OK for the past, but sucks for the future
because it ignores two overriding constraints: human population growth rates and total available fossil fuels.»
Poptech does not understand that many great engineering teams have characters such as
Mosh on board, and they thrive
because of it.
I was working for a solar power company and my boss got two phone calls saying I didn't belong in the renewable energy industry
because of the book I wrote with
Mosh about Climategate.
Mosh is correct, I did say as part of my summary characterisation of Gavin's response that «He said he wasn't coming
because policy discussion is off the table and anyway the science is settled».