Particularly in more rural areas — anywhere between the coasts really — it's super difficult to invest in private companies
because angel investing infrastructure is extremely limited, if not not non-existant.
It uses an index instead of raw deal count numbers
because angel investing is so opaque.
Not exact matches
Angels generally stop
investing when the stock and housing market crashes
because — wait for it — they feel poor.
That's
because historically, access to
investing in top small businesses and startups has been largely limited to well networked
angel investors, and venture capital funds, all doing so via exclusive closed door deals.
Because angel investors assume a great deal of risk by
investing in early stage companies, applicants should be able to make a compelling case for a 10x or better return on investment within 5 years.
It's hard for
angels to assess whether or not to
invest because they often have day jobs and can't commit to the kind of due diligence that most VCs go through.
Taking it from an investor perspective (not me,
angels) I think it's totally unfair to see early
angels invest, take more risk, help you get to the next level through both sweat & money, and then pay a higher price
because the round had a convertible note with no cap.
These negotiations are so difficult
because best practices for
angel investing and entrepreneurship are still being developed.
Unlike venture capital fund managers (called «VCs»),
angels can be gutsy, fast decision makers
because they
invest their own savings.
Still, if Ohtani is a good pitcher, and Ohtani's bat actually is an asset for the
Angels when he's in the lineup, then oh man, this dude is going to create arguments about the Most Valuable Player award that I'm actually going to be
invested in,
because they're going to be philosophical and annoying as hell.
Institutional equity finance is also difficult to access: most venture capitalists and many business
angels will not
invest in games
because of high risk levels, low knowledge levels about the industry and high, largely fixed costs of due diligence relative to the amount of equity sought.