Sentences with phrase «because authors know»

I typically take world rights to my books because the authors know I am their best chance of being published anywhere.

That's because authors know, if you really want to make a self - published book work or be a big deal, you have to work your ass off.

And I agree with Terry R that I continued because the author knew how to write with provocation, keeping the story alive.

The chapters on fostering creative thinking are terrific, in part because the author knows how little confidence many lawyers have in their own creativity.

Not exact matches

This could be because the original article leaves the author enough wiggle room, including the use of a question mark headline, to say, «I didn't say we knew for sure.»

No, the real reason to write a book is because there is something you have to explore that you think readers want to learn about, not because you think putting «author» on your LinkedIn profile is smart.

«If people know that their fellow co-workers are watching out for theft, they will think twice before stealing because there are higher odds they will be caught,» says Terrence Shulman, founder of the The Shulman Center for Compulsive Theft, Spending & Hoarding and author of Biting the Hand that Feeds: The Employee Theft Epidemic (Infinity Publishing, 2005).

Star Wharton professor and author Adam Grant knows this not just through research and observation but because he is, himself, one of these restless strivers.

Because We've been Looking for Solutions in the Wrong Place: Author Claims to Know a Better Way

This is exactly what the author is saying: you don't understand because you are not an atheist and probably know none.

So, I have a Ph.D. in Theology / comparative religions and published author (known to personally debate with your good and misguided church propagandist Mr. Turley (LDS managing director of famil and church history) because I wanted to «understand.»

No, because the injunction against reproving the author of an obviously well - intentioned gesture is an unalterable principle of manners.)

Reading articles like this is so painful because it is so obvious the author knows nothing about any of the religions he's writing on.

Nicola Veronese, the lead author of the study and a scientist at the National Research Council, told CNN that «fried potatoes consumption is increasing worldwide,» because people all over the world know what they want, and what they want are fried potatoes.

It helps us to know that every word of Jesus, Paul, Peter, etc is not captured in the Bible because: — We will always be challenged to understand the fullness of the message the authors were conveying to their audience.

The author says, he is well known because he challenges some ingrained ideas about Jesus and is good at reducing his message down to a soundbyte.

«They got» a (sic) remember there can be no LOVE for one another, because God is the author of love, even though the Bible never says anything of the sort and there are lots of atheists in love and atheists whose love of humanity leads them to significant acts of charity, but nevermind that!

He suggested I read Leo Strauss... I have always appreciated that and I still admire him for this, because I believe one must be very generous in order to lead a young man with whom one enjoys a friendly and trusting relationship, a close intellectual relationship, towards an author, a colleague in a sense, whom one knows will become a dominant influence for this young man.

In one of my posts of infamy, I mentioned that I knew my thinking was changing because I started agreeing with authors I used to despise.

This divine author did not grope from beginning to end, or vice versa, but knew the end at the beginning because he is the Lord who is, who was, and who comes.

@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth of Christ, Your interpretation of God at His worst shows a complete lack of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts of the New Testament were written in as to date there are no original copies available.Greek was the common language of the day.Most of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes&raknew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes&raKnew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes&raknew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»

They will know that whatever may be the real and ultimate truth of God's being and purpose (and it must be, in the nature of the case, far beyond our knowing), we never approach so near to that truth as when we say with Paul, «God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us,» or with the author of the Fourth Gospel, «God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son,» or with still another of those upon whom the light first shone,» Because of the great love wherewith he hath loved us, God hath made us, who were dead in sins, to live again with Christ.»

I know authors who are afraid to share their egalitarian views on their blogs because they might lose their book contracts.

I am no Scholar but, I believe God has the power to change prophecy the way that he did with Hezekiah, his intentions for a perfect people in the beginning changed due to disobedience so who's to say our men or intended leadership has overall been disobedient, and many women have been forced to lead and in that leading women have been more obedient.We all need each other if my husband was a pastor and I'm his help mate if he for some reason can't teach or preach who else other than myself would be the closest to him.I don't believe GOD changes he's always the same but, he does have the power to make changes and he does not need our permission to do so, instead of debating back and forth over our version of the Bible we should be sure we have the Holy Spirit and real relationship with GOD because he will reveal to us his truths but, please know he's not the author of confusion

Maybe the author is asking a sin question because he has never known his sins have been truly forgiven.

You're only comeback to that was that you know Abe Lincoln was written as fiction because the author says so but refuse to understand that if we had the authors of the bible alive and could talk with us you'd probably find the same thing (obviously also as.sumption, but hey, if you think the authors wrote the bible as purely historical text, prove it).

I know that some verses seem like He did initiate it, but that is because He inspired the Biblical authors to place the blame on Him, for in a sense, He was responsible that the flood came.

They are knowingly attempting to inject their religious world view on everyone and anyone because they believe they know how best to live and don't give a rat's ass about anyone elses freedoms or rights, but if you want to call that «doing their best» then you can take your message back to it's authors, the vile disgusting things, the wh.o.re of Babylon, the putrid decaying evil of Joseph Smith and shove it down his dead and crumbling corpse.

The author was saying it does, because if there is a God, even if we don't know why evil exists, if there is a God, there is a reason, even if we don't know it.

And so now, sadly, the unnamed authors of the accusatory books and articles make themselves look foolish because, for everybody who knows better, the view they are trying to refute doesn't exist!

«Chile is used as an amulet, probably because of its well - known protective pharmacological properties, and in religious ceremonies, witchcraft, and conjuring; its fiery potency is considered a powerful means to any end,» observed Beatrice Roeder, author of Chicano Folk Medicine from Los Angeles, California.

Although I write for a living, everyone I know who writes about food and recipes, from top - selling authors to people who work for small community - based publications, will invariably tell you that the main reason they work so hard to create recipes is because they really do want people to cook and bake from them.

Food Allergy Center director and senior author James Baker commented on the necessity for further research, saying: «Food allergy has exploded in prevalence and incidence but we still know so little about it because there hasn't been that much research in the field.

by the way don't know how the author came with the names of Moaninho and Martinez, they were never first choice to any ARSENAL fan, but maybe at some point the thought came because anything was / is better of what we have, the DELUDED one must leave preferably by his own accord so we can still look at him with the respect he earned in the Old Days.....

I wasn't going to log in because of more than a few toddlers talking bollox but I said I better let the author know it was a top read.

But I was pleasantly surprised by how balanced the book is overall (perhaps because Wolfinger, whom I've come to know, is a liberal and a nonbeliever) and how the authors acknowledge that religion is not a «magic bullet» when it comes to the real challenges facing minorities in the U.S. today, and there are many.

«However, an exact figure for global CO ₂ emissions resulting from the infant formula industry is not known,» says Alison Linnecar, author of the report, «partly because the CO ₂ emissions per liter vary between countries.

Remove any traces of milk or formula because the leftovers encourage bacteria to grow, according to Ann Peters, author of «Babycare: Everything You Need to Know.»

That's because sucking on a pacifier locks a child's mouth in an unnatural position, making it more difficult for him to develop his tongue and lip muscles normally, says Patricia Hamaguchi, a speech - language pathologist from Cupertino, California, and author of Childhood, Speech, Language, and Listening Problems: What Every Parent Should Know.

«Developmentally and neurologically it's difficult because children survive by letting their needs be known immediately,» says Michael Osit, EdD, author of Generation Text: Raising Well - Adjusted Kids in the Age of Instant Everything.

Partly because this is a time of change and within living memory, but also because it is clear that the author knows and enjoys a wealth of information & sources which he wants to share with the reader.

No random sampling; authors appear to have simply cherry - picked water wells previously known to have high concentrations of methane, although they never actually mention in the report which wells they sampled or where they're located: «Jackson said the study was indeed not random, but that was because they needed homeowners permission to test their water.»

I don't know how the author came about his story, but he totally got it wrong because what he wrote basically is based on falsehood that reeks of deliberate misinformation and mischief.

«All of this obviously was acknowledged and the individual who is the author of that report obviously was informed of all that and that's why I stand with this administration because I know they are dedicated to excellence: nothing less, nothing more than pure excellence.»

«More than 90 percent of those in the United States who know they are at risk for HD because of their family history have abstained from genetic testing, often because they fear discrimination or don't want to face the stress and anxiety of knowing they are destined to develop such a devastating disease,» says H. Diana Rosas, MD, of the MassGeneral Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease (MGH - MIND), lead and corresponding author of the paper that will appear in the March 11 issue of Neurology and has been released online.

«This excess was not known before because nobody could measure it,» said senior author Edward Young, a UCLA professor of geochemistry and cosmochemistry.

The results are important, according to the authors, because they deepen our understanding of conditions on Earth when all life consisted of single - cell microbes and their metabolisms that we know today were only just emerging.

When it is an area that I know a lot about, I don't usually care much about these sections because they often reflect the authors» theoretical predilections and one of many ways to think about the method and results.

The method used in the study is known as the Hirsch Index and while the study authors acknowledge factors such as there being high public interest leading to more studies of a particular illness, they believe that because it is objective and evidence - based it will be a useful complement and guide to more traditional methods of risk assessment and can be used to produce a shortlist of pathogens for authorities to focus on.

I agree with the author who states that this question is asked because interviewers want to know how decisive you are.