Maybe you could also shed some light on this quote by Colm O'Shea «A lot of people say there is apparently no inflationary threat from the growing U.S. debt
because bond yields are low».
That favorable bond market can't be repeated in the next 15 years
because bond yields are now so low.
We don't suggest any bond mutual funds for the Honour Roll portfolios this year, mainly
because bond yields have dropped to such low levels that investing in a managed bond fund doesn't make sense.
One caveat is that annuity pricing can vary over time, not only
because bond yields fluctuate but also because insurance companies are not always hungry for your annuity dollars.
However, even in this situation bond funds almost always provide a positive return (if held for their duration)
because bond yields and inflation rise together.
However, even in this situation bonds almost always provide a positive return (if held for their duration)
because bond yields and inflation rise together.
That rule is harder to follow these days
because bond yields are lower, which means the bond portion of a nest egg throws off lower returns.
But it's wrong to assume that just
because bond yields are so low today that they have nowhere to go but up.
Stocks are cheap relative to bonds
because bond yields reflect little growth and aggressive central banks.
That's
because bond yields and stock valuations tend to track each more closely at higher levels of inflation.
Because bond yields are often changing, yield spreads are as well.
However, even in this situation bonds almost always provide a positive return (if held for their duration)
because bond yields and inflation rise together.
Finally, the Fed's easy - money policies have pushed investors into the stock market
because bond yields are so low.
We use nominal returns
because the bond yield is stated in nominal terms and includes an expected market inflation rate.
Not exact matches
In a client note on Thursday titled «Yanking down the
yields,» the interest - rates strategist projected that
bond yields would be much lower than the markets expected
because central banks including the Federal Reserve were reluctant to raise interest rates.
So, it is a very different market than it was 10 years ago, and you're going to see a lot of corporate
bond issuance as these infrastructure projects go out there, and you can capture some pretty good
yields and you know what you're buying
because it's a corporate
bond.
In other words,
because investors can not generate a sufficient return from low -
yielding bonds, they turn to stocks as their only alternative.
Because the central bank's purchases represent increased demand, it tends to push up government
bond prices, thus lowering
yields.
But he warned that could be changing: «There's a very low hurdle for that surprise
because bond market
yields are so low in the front end of the curve.
Investment manager Third Avenue announced plans to liquidate its high -
yield -
bond mutual fund, and it said it would ban redemptions
because it was unable to exit positions quickly.
That's
because low
bond yields reduce the odds that you will earn a return that keeps pace with inflation in coming years.
Government
bonds could help reduce default risk, but
because of the length of maturity required to earn any meaningful
yield, they do little to reduce duration risk - i.e. the overall sensitivity of a portfolio to interest rate rises.
Most investors shy away from
bonds because they
yield (or return) less than equities and tend to be more complex in nature.
They'll be hoping the benchmark for global borrowing costs rises even further,
because their collective bet on higher U.S.
bond yields has never been greater.
On a serious note, I was rotating into utilities instead of
bonds because of low
bond yields.
Treasury
yields have been rising not
because of rising risks but
because the asset bubble in
bonds is deflating, inflation is rising, and investors are demanding more
yield.
Because most wealthy Chinese seem to think about RMB in terms of USD or Hong Kong dollars, it is the fear that any depreciation of the RMB against those two currencies (the Hong Kong dollar is pegged to the USD through a modified currency board) greater than the couple of percentage points interest rate differential would
yield less than equivalent USD or Hong Kong dollar
bonds.
And retail investors, who have poured massive amounts of money into
bond mutual funds
because cash had a near - zero
yield, can now park money in T - bills and earn close to 2 % with no risk of loss.
When rates rise,
bonds drop in value
because fixed income buyers prefer investing in new
bonds with higher
yields.
The change came
because of the
bond yields increasing.
Many
bonds trade at negative
yields because the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Bank of Japan (BOJ) continue to buy
bonds as part of their management of monetary policy.
Advisors should give fixed indexed annuities (FIAs) a serious look
because FIAs offer a compelling story in an era of low
bond yields, according to Roger G. Ibbotson, one of the most recognizable names in finance.
Because they are considered to have low credit or default risk, they generally offer lower
yields relative to other
bonds.
Real
bond returns have been high over the past 30 years or so
because nominal starting
yields were high and inflation has fallen.
I slowed my municipal
bond purchases
because the 10 - year
bond yield edged down to about 2.15 %, which made
yields unattractive.
Generally, the higher the duration, the more the price of the
bond (or the value of the portfolio) will fall as rates rise
because of the inverse relationship between
bond yield and price.
If this doesn't underscore that longer - term
bond yields don't have to rise just
because the Fed hikes rates, we're not sure what would.
Higher
yielding fixed income offers those higher
yields because the issuers of the
bonds have a better chance of defaulting on their debt.
Because investors are being asked to assume this risk, high
yield bonds tend to come with higher coupon rates, which can generate additional investment income.
The REIT that was was attractive with a 5 % dividend
yield when the 10 - year
bond yield was at 2 % is no longer attractive when the 10 - year
bond yield is also at 5 %
because the 10 - year
bond is risk - free.
Because credit and default risk are the dominant drivers of valuations of high
yield bonds, changes in market interest rates are relatively less important.
As we've also mentioned before — and as this year's
bond market behavior emphatically demonstrates — longer - term
bond yields don't have to rise just
because the Fed is hiking rates.
Just
because there is a rule stipulating that QE program purchases of sovereign
bonds be in relation to GDP, the ECB has and will continue to do «whatever it takes» in order to prevent peripheral Eurozone
bond yields from blowing out to near - reality levels.
And during each of those prior
yield curve inversions my answer has been the same:
Because in two years your high -
yielding bond will mature and you'll be renewing at much lower rates.
«When I purchased long - term zero - coupon
bonds in the early 1980's at market
yields in excess of 13 %, I welcomed the prospect of outsized volatility
because I felt it would eventually work in my favour.»
You're right that the margin of safety is so much smaller in
bonds because the
yield won't be there to pick up the slack.
An increase in rates will still decrease the price of high -
yield bonds but not as much as with other
bonds because high -
yield bonds follow the economy more closely.
Because the level is so critical and the base is so big, a break in the long -
bond yield above 3.22 % likely would lead to a big move up in
yields.
Their cost of capital is a function partly of low interest rates and part of the implicit share price is a function of the fact that investors have looked at equities for dividends rather than
bonds for
yield because the
bond market is so expensive.
Another reason to hold shares in the high -
yield fund is
because of the way the
bonds react to the economy and interest rates.