Sentences with phrase «because buying points»
That's because buying points will save you a little bit of money each month and it takes time to break even.
https://www.mybanktracker.com/ Not exact matches
Ideology aside, Demographia has a point when it argues that Dallas beats Toronto also because more people in the Texas city can afford to buy a home.
Online advertising is a great place to learn how to buy ad space, because it offers you endless options for targeting your message, a huge range of price points, and easy - to - understand metrics.
«This is definitely something you'd buy, because the price point is pretty low.
Many people have bought into this space because it's one of the only places to get decent yield, but she points out that a number of companies only offer corporate debt because of market demand.
Fiverr, for example, is a common site that people buy links on because it can only cost $ 5 for hundreds of links pointing back to your website.
Rather than using the new data to push investors to buy stock, Wieser recommends caution because he believes that the we're approaching the saturation point when increases in digital ad budgets won't lead to increased sales.
Investors have been buying equities because of strong economic data and earnings growth, according to Phipps, who pointed out they have been mostly ignoring political turmoil, including the specter of nuclear war between the United States and North Korea and the investigation of potential links between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Information keywords (Review, How to, Best ways to, Ways to, I need to): These have a lower chance of converting than buy - now and product keywords; but they are still important, because at this point the user is still researching the niche.
In this unfortunate tipping point, the concentration of wealth in the hands of the few results in economic implosion because the 99 percent can't afford to buy anything the 1 percent has to sell.
at that point i wouldn't mind buying a 6 to 10K car, because i have a house!..
The main point is though that whenever investors are getting this impatient to buy something that has gone up in price for many years, it is high time to get out of Dodge, because a financial accident is usually just around the corner.
If you stayed the course during that time, things worked out pretty well, because you bought at the low point of the stock market, and you contributed more and can you imagine that tax lot that you invested in, in March 2009, where that is right now.
Buying something after it enters bubble territory can be very profitable, because huge gains will often occur AFTER valuation reaches a point where it no longer makes sense to a level - headed investor.
So you're obviously a good lead because you're in buying mode at some point, but I also have all these other customers that have bought for me before.
UNG is now setting up for an ideal re-entry point that is lower risk than last month's initial buy entry because the ETF has come into intermediate - term support of its 50 - day moving average.
That's because the EAFE funds available on the US exchanges such as EFA, IEF, and EZU, or the country - specific funds, all have the same or higher cost than a fund that is available to you right here in Canada, so there is no point to buy them.
So we ask ourselves: Why would the government wish to align with someone who popularizes a point of view («buy gold because it is going to $ 10,000 per ounce») that is a direct threat to it and to the Deep State financial elite it serves?
I am a Christian and I read and study the Bible but I do not buy into religion or religious sects because I see nothing but man made flaws, but that is beside the point.
My dad's response was that if I didn't want to go to church because I didn't believe any more, then he guessed they would be returning the bike they had already bought as my Christmas present and that there wouldn't be any point in me participating in the family Christmas celebrations.
I have reached the point that I simply can not buy any more new «dead tree» books because I simply do not have the space to put them!
As time goes buy the kind defenders of free will over their rejection to «dead» here and colossians 2:13 tend to resort to a familiar defense, that of labeling it a Calvinist viewpoint and that its almost a cultist view point to hold.Very sad yet very much the defense of many christians.Dead may i suggest is dead, the inability to respond, does not mean that prior to being saved one could not read scripture but because of this spiritual deadness its not profitabel / meaningful - we just can not continue to revise the meaning of dead to fit a view point - because natural man has not been born again this deadness (spiritually) shows itself as «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human will.
As a christian apologist, Chad, has 2000 years of «facts and testimony» to draw on to defend the delusion, not to the degree of proof or evidence; only to the point that a whole lot of people bought into the scam, therefore the scam is true based on the bible, why, because a 2000 year old book, that very same bible says so, which completes the circle.
The Bible points out, he went on, that there will be a day «when you can't buy or sell without the Mark of the Beast, you have to be part of that world system and a very, very few can escape because right now they can go down into the bush in the darkest Africa and hunt you down.»
So the kids are yelling at me because I won't buy them every single item they point to, and we're at the back of the store getting ready to turn around and go back up to the front to checkout, when what to my wondering eyes did appear?!
Basically it sucks you in to buying even more of things you may already have because you figure «hey I get points!».
«We're looking into buying biodegradable plastic containers, first and foremost, because it's the right thing to do, just from a philosophical point of view.
Double points because it makes use of that tube of anchovy paste I bought to make the Drunken Shrimp recipe....
* And because I understand the hypocrisy of pointing out the environmentally destructive aspects of the palm oil industry while still doing things like buying shit that's made in China or not always supporting my local farmer, there's this.
I, admittedly, used to be the type who would buy the off - brand cling wrap because I tend to be unnecessarily frugal at times but, at some point, Thom talked me into spending a few extra bucks on the quality stuff and I haven't reached for the $ 2 roll, since.
I made a point of going back to the wine store (you know, because I needed an excuse to get more wine) to buy other flavors.
I'm seriously at the point where I can only buy what I need for a recipe because I do love dried cherries SO much!
I've got a smaller bundt pan and need to cut the bake time in half (I point this out because I didn't know they came in different sizes when I bought mine)
Instead of being ambitious we are mediocre and only go for these average players because arsene refuses to see a gap, go for the jugular (last season case in point when we were on top and we should have strengthened instead of buying an injured player ffs) It's simple - teams target our snails, Hence why we always get trounced by the better teams THAT HAVE PACE!!!!
the problem is pairing of players when we bought ozil we were so comfortable that season because teams came at with pressure after that we always took the three points.
but a t some point he lost it, and is not because of his stinginess to buy players, our core is good and has been for sometime now, his biggest problem was adaptation, change to the new EPL, his philosophy dating back 20 years does not work anymore and he knows it, because of this his biggest flaw all others came out to light, lack of rotation of his players favoring some over others, stubbornness that applies to his transfer policy buying for the future just as he had 20 more years ahead, players playing out of their natural positions, ARSENAL FLOPS who knows under other Managers they could have been great, for some reason they were signed in the first place, they must had some talent, best example is Campbell....
If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again
Giroud is quality yes but for instance say we bought ibra at 33 yrs now... tell me who would bench the other because i really need to see your point of view... make me understand that he is the forward we need and i will never miss a top quality attacker like aguero again
Failure shouldn't necessarily be blamed on transfers.It's part of the reason but is not the only reasons.Other clubs which can't even buy like Arsenal have won very good trophies.Even at those times we were in debt we had a good team capable of winning the EPL or winng some of the smaller trophies.But we just went on trophyless.Now we are almost debt free and we are promised glory but honestly we don't even have the hope of glory.The only thing that can save us is renewal of the mind of the manager and board.That will bring a positive change.It's only insanity to keep doing the same thing and expect different results.We have a lot to prove out there to the world because the greatness of Arsenal has really gone down in the face of the world.They only see us as a team with good football that's all.The world doubts us and we have a point to prove.The values of a club is as important as winning trophies.If not Arsenal wouldn't have been this top club that people talk about everyday were it fpr only values or trophies.They go hand in hand.However, to the world trophies are very important and that fact can not be hidden.
- Garth arrived in January - We were going into the season with 3 designated players (Oba, Clint, and Valdez with Ozzie bought down with allocation)-- I don't recall rumors of Lodeiro at that point because a new DP wasn't on the horizon.
Wenger is so stubborn he will probably NOT buy anyone whether we drop points or not because he believes his squad is good enough.
why was Sanchez truly playing... no one believes he was too injured to play to start the season, and some like myself would go as far to suggest he wasn't injured at all... so why play him... they can't say it was to appease the fans because when was that ever a factor at this club except when «panic buys» were in the offing... I believe that this was to give Arsenal a little leverage when it comes to negotiating his transfer... just imagine their horrible bargaining position if Sanchez never saw the field before the deadline then heading back to South America and played for Chile... regardless of the facts, this was sadly again another example of a team putting business ahead of fielding a team with the greatest chance to secure 3 points... of course, some will say that Sanchez is, or was, our best player, so obviously he's a no - brainer to start, but those who really watch the game know that his heart hasn't been truly in it for quite some time... even at the end of last season you could see a definitive difference between the Sanchez who played for Chile and the one that played for Arsenal... that being said, 70 % of Sanchez is still better than a 100 % of the vast majority of our remaining roster... shame on you Arsene and shame on you too Sanchez for that telling smirk... I've supported your attempt to push this squad to the next level but don't pretend for a second that you didn't know you were being watched... don't lower your standards or you'll end up like this club, on the outside looking in
That cost us plenty of points this season until Coquelin's emergence, and we had to panic buy Danny Welbeck on the last day because Giroud got injured.
even if it means not buying and losing the PL (because from my eyes, buying WC players would solve the problem, but from wenger's point of view, it would not necessarily solve the problem).
We shouldn't bother buying new players until a new manager comes in because what will be the point of new signings under wenger.
Wenger himself doesn't want to spend all in the name of «I have not got the right quality in the market, the prices are way above their actual valuation» etc. but even if he does buy, it's difficult to believe anything could easily change at the moment because he doesn't have guts to point fingers at players who even make serial mistakes e.g. xhaka in three consecutive games, his three mistaken passes have resulted into three goals which I doubt a coach like maurinho can tolerate.
not to you Uzi Ozil but to the point u raised about monreal, that he improved his game massively because of the patch where he played as a cb, i know many here had a reason to criticize wenger for not buying a cb then but many here also bashed the prof that he wouldn't know whom to play where... look u haters before teaching wenger on tactics just think a bit more about it..
My point is, the reason we are playing poorly is not because we do nt have a proper DM so stop blaming wenger for not buying a DM as if a DM will start winning us games!
But yet again we have a horrendous streak of giving up point to everyone like an open bar while we are in front row seat looking at the season going away... And that is not because we bought / didn't bought players.
This wont happen in the summer because Wenger point blank will not spend the money on the out and out striker we really need you wont see him buying in a diego Costa or a Suarez this summer because Wenger REFUSES TO SPEND ANY MONEY AND I MEAN REAL MONEY.