Sentences with phrase «because changes in mass»

As researchers in this review pointed out, ``... the 3500 - kcal rule predicts that a person who increases daily energy expenditure by 100 kcal by walking 1 mile (1.6 km) per day will lose more than 50 lb (22.7 kg) over a period of 5 years, the true weight loss is only about 10 lb (4.5 kg), assuming no compensatory increase in caloric intake, because changes in mass concomitantly alter the energy requirements of the body.»

Not exact matches

This makes mass customization possible, because machines can identify where products are in the process and make changes accordingly.

Despite the day's developments, there was deep skepticism in Washington that anything would change because of the long history of inaction by state and federal politicians after similar mass shootings.

Because the mass shootings in America have become a horror of repetition in which meaningful change has come to seem impossible.

I can explain climate change as a result of a natural cycle caused by the masses and orbits of the planets, but I don't go around calling believers in humans causing climate change idiots simply because I know what actually causes it.

For these reasons, as Schramm notes, in major decisions which involve significant and central attitude change, the channels of interpersonal communication and influence are far more effective than mass media because of the opportunities they present for reinforcement of response and ongoing group support.

We can not ask the fans to boycott the games because they won't have the «balls» to step up, if is clear... Arsenal fans have been taken for a drive and for mugs for years, bug still we have record sell in shirts and people are still coming in mass to the Emirates (to watch that shite) despite constant increase prices... If you ask me, why would Wengef and the board change their attitude and objectives.

Without that critical mass of available labor — free to move in part because companies so frequently fail — the Valley couldn't sustain the waves of startups whose inventions have changed our lives.

Cuomo said the change is important because domestic violence and threats against women are linked to nine out of the 10 deadliest mass shootings in U.S. history, including the shootings this year in Las Vegas and Sutherland Springs, Texas.

Dick's changed its policies because «thoughts and prayers are not enough,» Chief Executive Edward W. Stack said in a statement, referring to a phrase often used after mass shootings that has become increasingly mocked.

The small increase in the high - dose group did not translate into beneficial effects because authors found no difference between the three study groups for changes in spine, average total - hip, average femoral neck or total - body bone mineral density, trabecular bone score, muscle mass or sit - to - stand tests.

Because we have such amazing accuracy we were able to see that between these two seas the elevation varied smoothly about 11 meters, relative to the center of mass of Titan, consistent with the expected change in the gravitational potential.

These changes are important because intimate partner violence is strongly tied to mass shootings: A 2015 report by the Congressional Research Service found more than one fifth of all public mass shootings between 1999 and 2013 were precipitated in part by domestic disputes.

Many physiological responses in present - day coral reefs to climate change are interpreted as consistent with the imminent disappearance of modern reefs globally because of annual mass bleaching events, carbonate dissolution, and insufficient time for substantial evolutionary responses.

As the bright star transfers mass to the black hole, the two will slowly move away from each other because their orbits will readjust to the change in mass.

Evidence from glacial advance / retreat (e.g. the evidence from tropical Andean glaciers you cite above) is often difficult to interpret, because glacial mass balance represents in general a subtle competition between the influences of ablation (determined by changes in temperature thresholds reached) and accumulation (determined by changes in humidity and precipitation).

Because much of Earth's land mass is covered by plants, there is a large source of these biogenic aerosol particles that need to be accounted for in climate change prediction.

The 5 -3-2 plan works so well because it uses a form of periodization in your training, involving a change of weight and number of reps over a period of time, which results in gaining muscle mass and strength.

I can amplify my acceleration, making me faster at slowing down and changing direction because now I take this mass and I've better connected the mass out at the hands to the mass in the center.

«When you move a kettlebell through various planes of motion, the weight feels like it's changing because it's displaced from its center — unlike other tools, like a dumbbell, which has a load symmetrical to its center of mass,» says Kelvin Gary, owner of Body Space Fitness in New York City.

Because changes in skeletal muscle mass are likely due to imbalanced rates of protein synthesis and breakdown, amino acid tracer techniques have been used to assess the whole - body and skeletal muscle protein metabolic responses to varying levels of dietary protein and energy intakes (3, 14, 17 — 20).

In large part because the legal environment has changed: it's much more hostile to mass tort actions, thanks in large part to a conservative majority on the Supreme CourIn large part because the legal environment has changed: it's much more hostile to mass tort actions, thanks in large part to a conservative majority on the Supreme Courin large part to a conservative majority on the Supreme Court.

It might quickly change in size (i.e. grow or shrink in appearance) because of the reactions around the mass.

Side note I think everyone is a little guilty of elitism from time time regardless of game genre I've been the worst with gears 1i think mainly because I hated the change in MP Some would say it improved idk I preferred the more hardcore and less Approachable MP vs mass friendly.

Regional variations arise because the Earth's gravity field is affected in multiple ways by the melt of ice, due to the direct effect of surface mass changes (the gravity field is determined by the distribution of mass), the consequent deformation of the Solid Earth (removing a load causes the Earth's surface to rebound, which in turn changes the distribution of the Earth's mass), the consequent redistribution of ocean water (the ocean surface is shaped by the gravity filed) and perturbations of the Earth's rotation axis (because of mass redistribution).

Oh, and the «tidal» pattern is because of the change in masses, not the average.

The cloud parasol feedback is quite powerful, depending on the size, shape, mass and charge of the complex, and, additionally, because of phase change energies on the DNA particles, forming or not, in cloud nucliation processes bring to cloud dynamics significant forcings.

I understand it is because in the last few years the temperature of the Earth has actually cooled so, rather than lose the momentum they had gained to make political inroads to underwrite global measures to control societies» behaviors when it comes to things like use of fossil fuels, proponents decided to cut their losses and change the term so they wouldn't be obviously wrong to the masses as it snowed on various global warming rallies.

The only things that can change that resultant point of temperature equilibrium significantly are changes in solar radiance coming in and changes in overall atmospheric density (a function of mass and pressure) which affect the radiant energy going out or a change in the speed of the water cycle which, because of the unique characteristics of the phase changes of water altering the speed of energy flow through the system is capable of exerting a powerful regulatory effect.

The current impasse in climate science has arisen because AGW proponents say that simply altering the radiative characteristics of constituent molecules within the atmosphere can result in a change in system equilibrium temperature without any need for an increase in mass, gravity or insolation.

A change in radiative characteristics alone does not make more energy available because solar insolation at TOA remains the same, mass stays the same and gravity stays the same.

So you have two hemispheres with different «sensitivities» because land mass amplifies changes in forcing / feedback.

The statement that only 55 % of human CO2 emissions have been removed by the biosphere / biosphere is something you'll have to prove, which is hard because as far as I'm aware human CO2 does not posses an isotopic signature that can be easily differentiated from natural sources — the arguments you often hear on Skeptical Science are measurements in changes of the C12 / C13 / C14 atmospheric mass, not individual CO2 molecules, which can be misleading.

If there's no radiation from the Sun, no heat capacity in the model planet, no mass big enough to effect pressure changes («real» ideal gases which don't have mass), nothing much is happening because there's no movement, (movement from the play of hot and cold volumes as hot gases rise and cold sink, becoming less dense and gaining density), but,

Q is heat and because both pots have same mass and specific heat you can simplify the equation to Q (heat) = change in temperature

Living tree mass could change because of net changes in forested area (due to natural or human causes) or because of changes to tree mass per unit area (due to increases in density or average tree size).

> remove or oversteepening slopes causes mass wasting > > improperly operated dams and levee management cause catastrophic failures improperly operated dams and levee management cause catastrophic failures — Accelerate processes already occurring > > Build buildings along cliffs / In theory this could occur — idea proposed by William Morris Davis called peneplanation — does nt happen on earth (in most areas) because internal forces cause uplift > > increases potential energy > > usually initiates changeIn theory this could occur — idea proposed by William Morris Davis called peneplanation — does nt happen on earth (in most areas) because internal forces cause uplift > > increases potential energy > > usually initiates changein most areas) because internal forces cause uplift > > increases potential energy > > usually initiates change /

In summary, Monbiot believes that the reason that the masses have not risen up to demand action on climate change is because they have been hoodwinked by a conspiracy to subvert the public understanding of the issues, paid for by vast corporate interests.

Even if our CO2 emissions were to increase the temperature the effect would be indiscernible because the amount of change would be related to total atmospheric mass and not related to the proportionate increase in CO2

Ideal gas which has no mass therefore no weight under gravity because there is nothing on which gravity can pull; which has no volume therefore does not expand or condense changing its weight under reduced and increased pressure or heat and cold and so does not become lighter or heavier than air under gravity; with no attraction therefore merely capable of bouncing off another and not capable of undergoing chemical changes, such as water and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere forming carbonic acid.

Because of changes in Earth's gravity field resulting from ice sheet mass loss, ocean sea level will actually drop near the areas of melt and rise elsewhere.

The ocean dominates the change in energy because of its large mass and high heat capacity compared to the atmosphere.

However, detecting acceleration is difficult because of (i) interannual variability in GMSL largely driven by changes in terrestrial water storage (TWS)(7 ⇓ — 9), (ii) decadal variability in TWS (10), thermosteric sea level, and ice sheet mass loss (11) that might masquerade as a long - term acceleration over a 25 - y record, (iii) episodic variability driven by large volcanic eruptions (12), and (iv) errors in the altimeter data, in particular, potential drifts in the instruments over time (13).

Because it seems to me that nobody at Westlaw has bothered to turn on CNN International, BBC and Al Jazeera over the past 8 months and had a serious think about what will be the results of the mass political movements in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria as well as the changes afoot in Morocco and Jordan.