Sentences with phrase «because changes require»

While procedures, documents, and communication require thoughtful planning and significant time investment, attitudes, and behaviors pose the greatest challenges, because these changes require your employees, themselves, to change.

But it didn't, because change requires the acquiescence of people who have reaped the most benefits from it.

Not exact matches

The reason we're more susceptible to change during times of personal crisis is because real behavioral change requires participation by the limbic system.

And, because the required skill sets will change dramatically over time as a business grows, it is also critical that the management be sufficiently flexible that it can adapt to the new requirements of the firm.

«Entrepreneurs do what they do because they want to, because they believe they need to, because they feel something must change, because they know their actions are required to make that change,» Larry Robertson stated in A Deliberate Pause: Entrepreneurship and Its Moment in Human Progress.

If the accounting change is required by the IRS because the method originally chosen did not clearly reflect income, however, the business must make the resulting adjustment during the current tax year.

However, because of the distributed network — which requires every computer to consent to any change — forks are not easy to achieve.

The change to «employee owned» would require the CEO and board members as fiduciaries, now would have the duty and the opportunity to promote good corporate governance to protect the assets under their care, and because the corporation is at least 51 % employee owned the focus would be not just the bottom line.

Because shareholders of those same companies may find it difficult to initiate such a change, given the difficulties of collective action, a legislative change requiring a split leadership structure but permitting shareholder - approved opt outs may improve governance for many companies while imposing relatively minor costs on companies generally.

We have long argued that our value investing philosophy stands the test of time because it only requires that: first, human nature does not change; and second, we maintain our discipline.

Because the Bitcoin code is not managed by a central authority, changes to the code require buy - in from developers and miners.

Because the changes in tax law may not affect all investor classes equally and may be different depending on the state in which the investor is located, the effect of these changes on demand for tax - exempt bonds and required investor yields is still being determined.

However, in most cases the amortization period changes because different borrowing terms, interest rates and payments against the principal amount at each renewal vary the length of time required to pay off the mortgage.

Further, given the constantly changing goal - posts of a politics immersed in the emotivist chaos of competing psychological identities and subjective personal rights, why on earth would anyone now want to pursue a career that in five, ten, or fifteen years might be torn from them simply because somebody somewhere finds a right to goodness - knows - what in the Constitution — even, as in this case, when their job does not actually require them to be involved in said goodness - knows - what?

«I think it's easier to attack Lutz's person than to take on his message (hypocritical or not) because it would require some of us to change ourselves.»

In any case, I think it's easier to attack Lutz's person than to take on his message (hypocritical or not) because it would require some of us to change ourselves.

Actually Saraswati, you abandoned your original position that America is a «two party system which only legislation is likely to change» and supported everything I said, which is that legislation is not required, and the number of parties is not designed into the system, and it's not likely to happen because people here prefer to abandon their true beliefs in favor of a lesser evil that might win.

But kids will undoubtedly change the nature of how we go about our faith construction, because they will require a safe and secure home.

your understanding of the change process is very simplistic, because your mind is not open, you specifically believe already in the traditional doctrines, Dogmas as shown in thousands of years of history evolves, and the need for input variables, meaning the diversity of religious belief is necessay because nature through his will is requiring this to happen, we are being educated by God in the events of history.In the past when there was no humans yet Gods will is directly manifisted in nature, with our coming and education through history, we gradually takes the responsibilty of implementing the will.Your complaint on your perception of abuse is just part of the complex process of educating us through experience.

But when it came time to change his mind and lift the curse he put on all mankind because two people wanted knowledge, he required a human sacrifice, no less than his own son.

Catholicism / Christianity seems to be more challenging for me because it requires work, discipline, forgiveness, change, humility, repentance, obedience and prayer.

Faith is so popular worldwide because it never requires you to change your mind about anything, and allows you to believe that god himself is on your side no matter what crazy side you're on.

Ford, in tracing the changes in the development of Whitehead's system, suggests that»... with the development of intellectual feelings, Whitehead could well have discovered that his conception of God as a synthesis of purely conceptual feeling was deficient... -LRB-(because)-RRB- without intellectual feelings, God could not be conscious, and these required a basis in physical feeling.

The question of pedagogical styles to encourage and train the imagination requires attention both because of emergent practices and because of the desire for change and transformation.

Also, their concept that time dilattion accounts for the day - epoc disparity is flawed because neither God nor man would be in a frame of reference where there is enough changing amount of gravition / acceleration required for the changing time - dilation effect.

Because their faith dictates that adherents strive toward a particular sexual ethic - one that confines sexual relations to those between a husband and wife and requires celibacy in all other circumstances - they seek to help patients manage sexual impulses through «cognitive behavioral change.»

Both substantive knowledge — some of it fairly abstract — and practical know - how will be required, and because ministry takes place amid the changing circumstances of life, intelligent adaptation and renewed learning will often be necessary as well.

Because the nature and needs of their constituencies change, both conservative and liberal churches now require programs different from those they presented in the past.

They like living in the past because the changes involved in the future require «work».

Certainly there will be those who reject the gospel because of the cost of discipleship, but let it be because of the cost of discipleship, not the cost of false fundamentals, not because they've been required to change something they can not change.

religions or cults present them an easy solution that does not require them to change the status - quo because it offers rewards after death.

The theory is both conservative, because it's based on previous knowledge, and radical, because it requires a major change in our way of thinking.

That's why all the training is required, because it's changing,» Hodge says.

We did have one rule which required two bites of everything, because it was magic that made one's tastes change.

«Eating habits are difficult to change unless a change is required because of a health condition.

I made a couple of changes: Potato starch instead of cornstarch just because I did not want to go to the store; 1 TEASPOON pepper because my daughter does not like spicy food; and Added a large dollop of Sambal Oelek (pepper sauce) to my serving post-cooking to make up for the required - by - teen blandness.It was delicious!!!

Exactly my taught, Giroud is what doctor ordered as Sanchez's backup, because they play different style of football, so we can always change our tactics when required.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

We already moan about Santi being used out wide, because it is NOT his natural position, well, to change tactics, formation, during a game, requires players changing roles and substitutions in order to carry it out.

He made those changes, but has not evolve as a manager because he never was one or could not get himself to the level required...!!

But I know when change is required but I don't where and when because of my believe which is I don't believe this club, the owner or group of owner, is capable of giving new coach # 200,000,000 to fix this mess we are in.

Counsel - with respect (so I don't have this post removed by Admin like two others to you today) we are all aware of the new Recruitments that were brought in by Ivan Gazidis.This was done quite obviously because Wenger USED to demand total control of the Club.He has dramatically failed these past seasons with his outdated and tired old methods so change was required and credit to Gazidis for making this happen.But this Club will not recover overnight.Wenger has seen to that.Until the support sees change and something new to look forward to then the apathy will no doubt continue.

Spurs will finish above Arsenal next season and we will not qualify for the UCL for the second season in a row because change is required and the forum football fans are restricted to a qwerty to show their angst

Arsenal's May uptick this season felt different to what had gone before because it involved such a radical structural change, such an admission from Wenger that his tactical outlook required modification.

Arsenal must learn the «modern game», sign quality players and change tactics when required or Arsene Wenger goes out because of his stubbornness.

Changes are certainly required from the team that failed to impress at Watford; not just because almost every player was hopeless but also because the team was so unbalanced.

I've been a little reluctant about this change - because truthfully, I don't always have the patience required for rethreading the needle (again and again), and untying the inevitable knots (again and again).

It might even be that the Lord called me to care for this family knowing nothing can change the poor outcome because I would provide the compassion or experience they required.

We are loving our waterproof cotton training pants, because she is able to feel when she is wet, but she is also able to still continue going to school (accidents don't require a full change of clothes).

I wish that book was required reading at a public education level, because I think it has the potential to change our society in such a positive way.