Sentences with phrase «because claim limits»

The reason you may want to buy flood insurance through a private insurer is because claim limits can be higher.

Not exact matches

Compounding a victim's frustration, the FBI is often unable to investigate claims made by individuals or entrepreneurs because the agency's limited jurisdiction and resources make it very difficult to investigate smaller crimes.

Only personality can limit me, because the other personality has its own demands and claims, its own law and will, which are different from mine and which I can not overcome as such.

Atheists can be 99.9 % certain that there is no God - based on scientific evidence - but even they can not claim to know 100 % because of the limits of human intelligence.

Because, it is claimed, evaluation presupposes valuation as a condition of its possibility, any merely «disinterested» or «value - free» understanding of human reflection is of necessity excluded.20 Any consideration of the evidence of experience could only in the nature of the case ever illustrate, but logically could not falsify what must always necessarily be the case, even if such a consideration could well force a limited reconstrual of the hermeneutical analysis always itself presupposed in the strictly conceptual presuppositional analysis which uncovers the necessity of such elemental valuing.21

It is a point, moreover, where civil religion and civility become much the same thing.2 I do not feel comfortable with the student's question of whether I am a Christian because the claims I make in the name of Christianity, while real, are nevertheless importantly limited.

It is so distinguished from many of them because it limits itself to questions of importance for man's meaningful existence, but it can claim no monopoly on such topics.

She added the company was limited in what it could say because it was yet to be served with the claim.

so they are LIMITING the kids choices on what they eat because they «claim» it has no nutritional value.

The Governor has claimed to have kept SOF spending growth to 2 percent or less in every year of his tenure.2 However, for the second year in a row, the budget remains within this limit because (1) items previously categorized as state operating spending have been shifted to «off budget» accounts; (2) cash disbursements have been shifted between fiscal years; and (3) other spending items have been reclassified.3

Responding to claims of allegations against the Managing Director of the Bulk Oil Storage and Transportation Company Limited (BOST), Alfred Obeng on Asempa FM, he revealed that some elements within the party are fueling his sack because he has refused to allow them have their selfish way.

During that call, Silver claimed «that there was no issue with him getting the fees because he «only represented the (limited liability companies)»» controlled by Glenwood, the filing states.

This is because a petitioner, who is seeking the removal of the EC chairperson, Charlotte Osei, has claimed that the EC boss put herself in a conflict of interest situation when she awarded the contract to Aerovote Security Printing (Ghana) Limited to print the pink sheets.

Although the work provided some evidence supporting the claim that Colombian planes had failed to respect the limit, Mena did not feel that the results were sufficiently certain for him to testify at The Hague, because parameters such as the height and velocity of the Colombian planes were unknown.

For decades, we have heard experts claim that we should limit our salt intake because it could lead to high blood pressure, kidney disease, heart disease, and a host of other ailments.

The thing is... you've got to claim your spot right away because each exclusive expert session will only be for free for a limited time.

The American Heart Association recently repeated advice to maintain, and even to increase, intake of omega 6 PUFAs.4 This advice has caused some controversy, because evidence that linoleic acid lowers the risk of CVD is limited — most trials that claimed to investigate the effect of exchanging saturated fat for linoleic acid involved multiple dietary changes or multiple interventions (or both).

Yes, they did happen to choose a very fashionable pattern, however I refuse to be limited to a life without it (especially during the winter months) just because they have tried to claim houndstooth and red.

But because the evidence supporting this claim comes from just a few limited studies, and because other studies contradict some of that evidence, it would be unwise to conclude that confounding is not a problem.

Technical Answer: «If a claim is made or a suit is brought against an insured for damages because of bodily injury or property damage... we will pay up to our limit of liability for the damages for which the insured is legally liable... and provide a defense at our expense by counsel of our choice even if the suit is groundless, false, or fraudulent.»

The Saxons were able to get the problem fixed because they were proactive and understood that there are strict time limits on making claims.

Liability coverage generally includes defense costs, as well, and most policies pay those without regard to the policy limits because it's in the best interest of you, the company, and other policyholders to prove the liability claim before paying it, in order to avoid large settlements for false or frivolous claims.

Found out right after the holidays that Discover without notice was going to lower my limit to $ 760 claiming I was a risk because my usage was to high and the only reason they claim they didn't is their decrease would have put me over the limit which would have been really damaging.

Increasing the replacement cost value by that amount will consequently increase the cost of your home insurance premium because of the new maximum claim limit.

Yes, that means that the insurer will pay for your defense — it's also their defense since they'd have to pay the claim, and generally it doesn't impact the amount of coverage available because that defense is outside the policy limits.

It's generally at least $ 100,000, and many people elect for higher limits because liability claims on renters insurance can be significant, especially those involving bodily injury or major property damage such as in an apartment fire.

Note: Your SMSF can't continue to claim ECPI for a TRIS that has ceased because the maximum annual pension payment limit of 10 % has been exceeded.

If your fund has failed to meet the pension standards because the trustee has not paid the minimum annual pension payment amount, there are limited circumstances where the Commissioner may allow the fund to continue to claim exempt current pension income (ECPI).

Again, insurers will attempt to determine those that have the greater probability of making significant claims, but the ability to do so is more limited, because people know when they are not well beyond when they have sought medical help in the past.

That's because a policy for each roommate means that your coverage limits remain your own and that checks for claim payment are made to the policyholder rather than to both of you, or to the roommate who bought the policy.

Often, these claims are settled at the policy limits, and the policy limits divided between the people who are owed money, because they know that the person responsible just doesn't have any money.

This is only possible in very limited circumstances, such as if you did not know about the decree because you did not receive the court papers and you have a valid defence to the claim.

However, if your Child Tax Credit is limited because it's greater than your tax liability, you may be able to claim the rest of it as the Additional Child Tax Credit.

When our shelters are empty because all of the unwanted, unloved dogs in this country have been adopted, and when the companies who manufacture gas chambers for animal shelters have gone out of business due to lack of customers, then I would say maybe we could consider limited numbers of dogs not being spayed, until then, it is the most absurd, downright stupid idea anybody who claims to love dogs, could possibly propose.

After spending a little over a week reviewing pet insurance companies in depth, I choose Healthy Paws because I felt that they offered the services I really wanted to find, for example, no lifetime limits per pet, no limits per claim or per year, they cover hereditary and congenital conditions.

After thorough research, I settled on Healthy Paws because: (1) Premiums can not be raised based on how many claims you submit, (2) There is no lifetime limit on coverage (this is especially important given the lifespan of cats), (3) You can visit ANY veterinarian you want (including specialists) and be reimbursed based on...

Formalism gave us standards of quality - however flawed and limited - those standards of quality were but its repudiation came about primarily because the art didn't deliver on its exclusive claim to high quality and taste.

There is a raging battle today about the size of fossil fuel reserves and resources, with «peakists» claiming that we are already at or near peak production of both oil and coal because the amounts of economically recoverable fuels in the ground are more limited than the fossil fuel industry has admitted.

The challengers next claim is that EPA is completely barred from limiting power plants» dangerous carbon pollution because EPA has already used another part of the law — Section 112 — to curb the same plants» emissions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants.

Now if neuro - scientists were claiming that a particular naturally biologically occurring chemical could drastically raise or lower brain function; but they only knew it because of computer models; and the computer models» prediction so far were garbage; and many of the neuro - scientists were caught lying and fudging data; and the chemical were necessary for normal brain function anyway; but they were arguing that we should reorder the world economy anyway by giving them control of the global food economy to limit the slight increase in ingestion that they claim is so dangerous....

Because the team - AGW claim that the MWP, if it happened at all, was limited to Europe, whilst this new research suggests that it occured in the US as well.

The findings suggest that critics of the treaty, including the Bush administration, may be correct when they claim the treaty is hopelessly flawed because it doesn't limit emissions from the developing world.

Tellingly, Blomqvist doesn't engage with my claim about the rebound effect, nor about the physical limits to efficiency gains (the paper I cite by Ward et al concludes that «permanent decoupling is impossible for essential, non-substitutable resources because the efficiency gains are ultimately governed by physical limits»).

Its interesting that the Divisional Court reviewed whether the small claims court deputy judge could use the inherent jurisdiction of the court to extend the two week time limit for withdrawing a ESA, 2000 complaint because the deputy judge hearing my case was convinced that he did not have the inherent jurisdiction to do so.

Although this indemnity product provided some level of comfort to plaintiffs who were not seeking or expecting significant damages, it offered limited protection to plaintiffs with claims worth hundreds of thousands of dollars because it was very unlikely that any adverse cost award would exceed the amount of their damages.

It is important to act quickly after your San Diego bus accident because you will have a limited amount of time to file a claim.

This is because claims of less than # 10,000 (unless they are personal injury claims in which case the limit is # 1,000) are «small claims».

Many injured workers are not aware of these at all and the insurance company does not have to and, in so many cases, will not give you any warning about your benefits being cut off soon because you have failed to claim something within the time limits or statute of limitations.

Just because the employer was permitted to limit his notice entitlement to no more than statutory minimums did not, by itself, vitiate any possible claim to other forms of damage.

Karen Hart received a limited settlement of assets worth # 3.5 m out of total resources worth nearly # 9.4 m after a 23 - year marriage because her husband claimed he brought significant wealth to their relationship, even though the judge said he was unable to determine which assets were from the marriage due to the husband's «poor» approach to disclosure and, at times, «deliberately obstructive» evidence.