Sentences with phrase «because classes are taught»

Not exact matches

I never put my name on the door of our yoga studio and only taught one or two classes a week once we were fully staffed because I knew I wanted to have the option to sell it one day, and for it to be sellable, it needed to be valuable without me being there.»

Because of a court case in Louisiana that expressly forbid Biblical Creationism being taught in school science classes, the wording changed and the authors removed references to catastrophism, a world - wide flood, a recent inception of the earth or life, the concept of kinds, or any concepts from Genesis.

He said that it shouldn't be taught in science class because IT»S NOT SCIENCE.

There is NO requirement that a comparative religion class be taught by some foolish dolt like you just because he / she believes.

I'm trying to figure out what the name of this class in seminary is called because it must be taught and taught well.

Contrary to the Editorial Board's portrayal of sin, the tradition Christian teaching is not that certain people are «inferior» or «second - class» because of sin.

@KatMat: your analogy would begin approaching realism if: — during the pledge of allegiance kids were forced to say «one nation under The Orioles» — our nation's currency said «In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned to death because they weren't fans of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted to have Intelligent Car Driving taught beside Evolution in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying in the realm of sport where it belongs

This statement comes from one of my ninth graders in response to yet another lecture of mine on how important it is for students to bring their literature books to class — a particular hurdle in my case because I teach at a military school....

Even a few years ago when I was teaching in a Catholic school, a teacher there (a nun) used to tell the class they were damned and going to hell just because they talked during the lesson!

Because I know that, I take the whole of the first class period each term that I teach that course (a one hundred minute class period) to tell them about the perspective from which the course will be taught.

Creationism isn't taught in science classes in public schools because it isn't science.

They had been at least minor movers and shakers in their communities, people who felt some responsibility for what went on around them largely because of a match between the moral teachings they grew up on in church and the possibilities inherent in their middle - class social roles.

Kermit... the reason that the bible is not taught in history classes is because it is not verifiable history.

I read this article by charisma magazine which i thought was well written which is pro Women preaching http://www.charismamag.com/blogs/fire-in-my-bones/16851-why-i-defend-women-preachers This debate is an on going one John Piper who i respect as a bible preacher believes that scripture is clear women shouldnt have authority over men or teach in the church some go as far as saying women shouldnt preach in sunday school if the classes are mixed.Personally i think times are changing and i say that because i have a women manager she has authority over me and other men so if we follow the biblical example i shouldnt allow myself to be in that situation which is just crazy thinking.

series St. Joseph Church History Dover's Calligraphy A to Z, because I'm hoping that this is how you improve handwriting in a middle - schooler Henle Latin 1, for a class our priest teaches at church Literature «Across the Curriculum,» as they say: Henri Fabre's Book of Insects King Solomon's Ring, by Konrad Lorenz Sun Slower, Sun Faster: Meriol Trevor Red Hugh, Prince of Donegal: Robert L. Reilly Come Rack!

It doesn't necessarily mean that a person is saved just because they quote Scripture, attend church, tithe, and raise their hands when singing praises to God, attend a Bible study, prays for an hour every day, teaches a Sunday school class and volunteers at the food bank.

Here was this amazing Ph.D. from whom I loved taking classes, and he was taking all his teaching expertise and gifting it to these elementary - schoolers — because he wanted them to have a great experience learning about God.

Stress is often what I teach most about in class, because it has been the biggest teacher to me.

«I knew he was in the class because my teaching assistants tell me he comes every day and does good work.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

It would be the highest form of injustice to sell Walcott and keep Welbeck and Giroud.What an overrated bunch of players we have in our team.No wonder 95 % of Arsenal players always fade away in other teams when they leave.If we are selling Walcott then why aren't we doing the same to Giroud and Welbeck.Someone should tell me why Walcott leaves but they should stay.I know many fans feel Walcott hasn't yet turned out to be world class and all that but looking at his goals it's fair to say he's done his bit.If you sell a player in the same scenario as Walcott you sell him because he failed.But have Giroud and Welbeck not failed at what they were supposed to do?Arsenal is such a stubborn club.It looks like the stories of Eduardo and Van Persie have taught us nothing really.Their injuries denied us the trophies as we had no capable back ups.If Laca gets injured we are doomed mark my words.

In fact, exercise is even more important once you're a dad, because it teaches your children good habits and also because, let's be honest, your children want you around for many years to come (after all, who else is going to splash the cash at Christmas and chauffeur them between parties and sports classes on an almost daily basis).

The vast majority of women are teaching childbirth classes because they are passionate about the information and helping birthing families.

Jolie Cash: Hot Mama Yoga cam about kind of in a funny way, because I've been teaching prenatal yoga and I thought that we need something that is going to get people interested, because when you come to a prenatal yoga class, a lot of women thought that prenatal is really boring, because they kind of just sit there and look over their shoulder and breath; and the equivalent of birth they say is like running a marathon.

Teach her to reframe irrational thoughts like, «I'm going to fail because I'm stupid,» with something more realistic like, «I can pass math class if I work hard.»

I worked because had I not, my own class of students would have been taught by a sub, who, since my department is predominately female, would likely have been another woman doing extra work for no extra compensation.

Braxton Hicks are also called «practice contractions» because they are a preparation for the real event and allow the opportunity to practice the breathing exercises taught in childbirth classes.

The majority of the classes I teach are in the evenings and on weekends (because the pregnant couples are still working).

I often hesitate to teach half moon pose in my prenatal yoga / postnatal yoga classes because it requires so much concentration on stability to avoid injury - which is more likely with a lot of relaxin in your body.

If it ever did, that would be tantamount to shutting down the schools in an entire district or region because one class teacher failed to teach right, causing his or her students to fail.

Often people are better at explaining one on one because you can learn exactly what the other person does or does not understand instead of teaching to the top / middle / bottom of the class.

«When I started teaching a class at the Abdullah bin Zeid for Basic Education for deaf and mute students, they stood out to me because they're very clever and can stay focused on a topic for hours.»

«When I first learned about the technology I was really excited because bowing is what makes the violin really live,» says Kimura, who teaches a graduate class in computer music interactive performance at The Juilliard School in New York City.

Even though I wasn't paid for my efforts beyond the wages I earned teaching classes, I managed the studio because I loved it.

Staff at the Centre for Students with Disabilities, which initially decided to offer the class to students with and without disabilities, suspended the program because they fear the teachings could be seen as «cultural appropriation.»

I mean, just this week I cried because my favorite yoga teacher announced that he is, in essence, retiring from teaching my favorite class.

But apparently I've grown up because I taught a group exercise class that morning then went to the parade, but took it easy to be prepared to run a St. Patrick's Day race on Sunday (before ANOTHER parade in this city).

«I had friends who were chefs and bartenders,» says Cosi, who was teaching yoga and waiting tables at the time, «and I could never get them to come to my yoga class because they were too intimidated to come to the studio.»

The only reason I started teaching yoga is because I needed a class in that particular style to go to.

In fact, Degroot admits she was never really a big craft beer drinker before she started teaching yoga at breweries, but now she couldn't imagine teaching a yoga class in a studio because she would miss having a beer afterwards.

I've mentioned ToeSox on the blog a bunch because I'm obsessed with their thigh - high leg warmers and wear the grip socks while teaching megaformer classes all the time.

Did you enjoy teaching yoga when your yoga teacher asked you to conduct a class or help others in your yoga class because they were struggling.

Being a doctor meant «I don't care about nutrition» because that's what the medical school taught me (and everybody else in my medical school class)-- not overtly, mind you, but we were the fix - it guys and girls.

The only reason people assume deeper stretches in a Bikram yoga class is because the unqualified dipshit teaching the class is encouraging people to overstretch themselves and put their joints, ligaments and capsules in a potentially disastrous state of looseness, instability and hypermobility.

I chose Camel Pose for this week's post because it's commonly offered in yoga classes but not often taught well.

When I teach my college class, I try to look business formal because I want the students to think I'm much older than them and -LSB-...]

The second outfit is the one I wore to NY Fashion Week and on the first day of school because it exemplifies what I said before; it is provocative enough to draw attention but I could still wear it to teach class and not look out of place.

When I teach my college class, I try to look business formal because I want the students to think I'm much older than them and not just a peer.

This was because my friend Trina, the owner of Beyond Beautiful Salon, had invited me along while she taught a Novalash Eyelash Extension class in the city.

I was apprehensive teaching the evening classes, especially because of what happened last week, but the classes were awesome and I had a really good time.