The ontological argument for the existence of God can not prove the existence of something that is self - contradictory.22
Because classical theism has committed itself to basic inconsistencies, no argument can establish its truth.
Not exact matches
As it happens, the Times Literary Supplement gave the book to the philosopher Anthony Kenny to review, perhaps
because he could never be accused of any parti pris in this debate, since he has in the past leveled his own severe criticisms against
classical Christian
theism for relying on an «outdated Aristotelian cosmology.»
Process
theism might be judged cognitively superior over the
classical type kalam model, not
because it involves no paradox, but
because it involves the least paradox in comparison with the formally possible theological alternatives, when all issues are considered.
Though Hartshorne has never given a great deal of attention in his writings to concrete religious phenomena, he has always been concerned about the religious significance of his work, He advocates the neoclassical conception of God partly
because he believes it is more in keeping with religious experience than
classical formulations of either
theism or pantheism.
We may speak by analogy with Hartshorne's «neoclassical
theism» of Whitehead's neoclassical empiricism» precisely
because it is a self - conscious revision of the
classical tradition on the one hand and can be seen to consist in an analysis of the formally possible doctrines regarding the character and content of experience on the other.
Like the other two, and with equal definiteness and eloquence, he rejected
classical theism (without so naming it) 3
because of its failure to protect freedom in our relation to God.