He pointed to the United Kingdom, where long - term investments in power generation have stalled
because climate and energy policy keeps changing «week to week.»
Not exact matches
But he said moving to meet
climate targets is becoming more affordable
because while
policy is still important the
energy market is transforming so fast that «market forces have taken over», market forces around wind and solar power and batteries «are just accelerating regardless of what anyone else does» and decisions by companies like AGL Energy to close their Liddell coal power station «are being made on economic grounds&r
energy market is transforming so fast that «market forces have taken over», market forces around wind
and solar power
and batteries «are just accelerating regardless of what anyone else does»
and decisions by companies like AGL
Energy to close their Liddell coal power station «are being made on economic grounds&r
Energy to close their Liddell coal power station «are being made on economic grounds».
After all, the authors of that letter are all
climate scientists,
and a critical analysis of their arguments might help to reinforce why RealClimate is wisely NOT a place for «debating»
energy policy — at least in part
because that's not a field to which
climate scientists bring any particular expertise.
I reached out to Pierrehumbert
because he is one of many authors of «Consequences of twenty - first - century
policy for multi-millennial
climate and sea - level change,» an important new Nature Climate Change analysis reinforcing past work showing a very, very, very long impact (tens of millenniums) on the Earth system — climatic, coastal and otherwise — from the carbon dioxide buildup driven by the conversion, in our lifetimes, of vast amounts of fossil fuels into useful
climate and sea - level change,» an important new Nature
Climate Change analysis reinforcing past work showing a very, very, very long impact (tens of millenniums) on the Earth system — climatic, coastal and otherwise — from the carbon dioxide buildup driven by the conversion, in our lifetimes, of vast amounts of fossil fuels into useful
Climate Change analysis reinforcing past work showing a very, very, very long impact (tens of millenniums) on the Earth system — climatic, coastal
and otherwise — from the carbon dioxide buildup driven by the conversion, in our lifetimes, of vast amounts of fossil fuels into useful
energy.
Because the scale of the
climate challenge is so large,
energy innovations must be paired with bold
policy initiatives designed to accelerate the deployment of new technology
and to reduce its cost.
Lawson: Well, look, the point is not, just the costs — although we do have in this country, in England, one of the highest
energy costs in the world, which is very hard on the poor
and hard on business
and industry, which is
because of our absurd
climate - driven
energy policy.
It is
because of such complications that the National Commission on
Energy Policy concluded in its December, 2004, report «Ending The
Energy Stalemate» («ETES») that «hydrogen offers little to no potential to improve oil security
and reduce
climate change risks in the next twenty years.»
The fight over clean
energy and climate policy in California is dripping with out - of - state oil money
because the oil billionaires want to stamp out the progress that has been made to move toward clean
energy and energy efficiency,
and keep us addicted to their fossil fuels.
But
climate and energy policies were not just drafted in spite of public opinion; there is another sense of «
because of», which makes public opinion a driver of them.
This puppy doesn't know who to vote for
because lines of democratic accountability have been obscured.The filibuster stands today as the single most important impediment to the significant reforms needed in America's
climate /
energy policies, its immigration
policies, its labor law
policies,
and its need for a functioning judiciary.
These cases are of particular relevance to
energy and climate change
policy because each of these sectors is expected to be a major driver of future
energy demand
and therefore greenhouse gas emissions.
In an e-mail to the Carbon Tax Center yesterday, American climatologist
and climate campaigner James Hansen said, «The important thing is to get on the right
policy track at the beginning — the
policy must attack the fundamental problem, that dirty fossil fuels are the cheapest
energy because they are not made to pay their costs to society.»
Ebell: «Yes, I do,
and I think that the campaign that we've just witnessed in the United States is interesting
because it's the first presidential campaign that we've had where both candidates, Secretary Clinton
and Mr. Trump, campaigned on
climate policy and on
energy policy and put forward very different views.
Because climate modeling has produced such fantastic
and accurate results, at bargain basement rate $,
and has been a godsend for setting
energy, transportation
policy and dietary guidance.
She is interested in
energy efficiency
policy because efficiency improvements are often identified as an important
and politically feasible step for reducing the U.S. greenhouse gas emissions that drive
climate change.
While DECC predict that
climate change
and energy policies will cause gas prices to go up by 18 %
and electricity prices by 33 % by 2020, they estimate (as of July 2010) that
because of reductions in
energy use «compared to the counterfactual scenario in which
climate change
and energy policies do not have an impact on
energy bills, on average, domestic
energy bills will be 1 % higher in 2020.»
While DECC predict that
climate change
and energy policies will cause gas prices to go up by 18 %
and electricity prices by 33 % by 2020, they estimate (as of July 2010) that
because of reductions in
energy use
In other words, on in every 23,124 people in the UK died last year,
because of fuel poverty, caused by the UK's
climate change
and energy policies.