Sentences with phrase «because equities require»

I made the shift from equities to an ETF / managed fund primarily because equities require significant research I didn't have the time for (hence the «couch potato» investment in Cadence and Vanguards ETF), and because with a small amount of funds available, regular investments in the stock market would lead to significant brokerage fees or very few investments per year.

Not exact matches

Because hedge funds are not required to report their bond holdings to the SEC (although they do have to report equity positions), we don't know exactly who owns how much of which Puerto Rico bonds.

I think what could happen is that you could see more procurement from the utility in wanting to own the assets and then less trying to enter into the PPA off - take agreements, because those are the contracts that are going to require tax equity dependency.

Managers of big banks claim that they can't fund themselves with more equity and still lend as much as they do now because stock holders require a higher rate of return than lenders do.

This is because with a principal - and - interest loan the borrower is required to regularly pay down the loan and build up equity.

Because balloon loans only require interest payments for the first several years, you will not build equity if you do not make additional payments toward principal.

The Board recommends a vote AGAINST a stockholder proposal seeking to have us adopt a policy requiring that senior executives retain a significant percentage of stock acquired through equity pay programs until reaching retirement age because our existing stock ownership guidelines and other compensation policies already effectively facilitate significant stock ownership by our executives, and establishing holding requirements based on a particular retirement age would not be in the best interests of our stockholders.

In social life, God commands that all cases shall be judged with equity; justice and charity are required; no injustices shall be done to people because of hatred toward them; all life is made sacred by God and may not be ended except through justice.

But, because running schools requires a lot of people, the «base staffing allocation» uses up more than 85 % of unrestricted General Fund resources, [2] leaving less for this equity - driven redistribution.

Balanced funds are great because they don't require investors to figure out a host of complicated considerations, such as how much of your portfolio should be weighted in small cap versus international equity funds.

Borrowers with a conventional loan can also benefit because FHA loans require as little as 3.5 percent in home equity.

These 2nd loans are similar to 125 % mortgages, because they require no equity, but this loan allows your combined loan to value to go up 5 % beyond the value of your house.

To pay for home improvements is one increasingly common use for a reverse mortgage, because unlike a home equity loan, reverse mortgages don't require the borrower to repay the loan until death of the last surviving spouse.

Investors own equities because the «no - go» economy still requires unimaginably cheap credit.

These 2nd loans are similar to 125 % mortgages, because they require no equity, as this loan allows your combined loan to value to go up 15 % beyond the value of your house.

Because the customer's equity had decreased to $ 3,615 (see above), the customer would be required to have an additional $ 540 in margin ($ 4,155 - $ 3,615).

That's because most lenders require you to have at least 20 percent equity in your home before they'll approve your request for a refinance.

For existing military homeowners, VA refinancing is easy because there is no equity required.

Now, investing in a private equity fund usually requires being an accredited investor, because the legal form is that of a limited partnership, and those who invest in that are supposed to be sophisticated investors who can afford to lose it all.

As a result the international community is not likely to respond with sufficient urgency and ambition unless greater awareness of the policy implications of the need to live within a carbon budget at levels required of nations because of equity and fairness considerations.

Because of the unwillingness of nations to agree on what equity requires of them, initial steps should be taken to increase awareness of the ethical and justice failures of national responses to climate change.

Some nations seem to be arguing that because there are differences among nations about what equity requires, this is justification for totally ignoring equity and justice issues entailed by making allocations among nations.

The C&C framework is therefore a very non-controversial way of demonstrating the utter inadequacy of developed nations ghg emissions reductions commitments because other equity frameworks would require even greater reductions from developed countries.

Yet emissions reductions that would be required of high emitting nations under other proposed equity frameworks would be even steeper because they take into considerations issues such as, for example, historical emissions, economic wealth of nations, and ability of nations to pay.

org, US reductions need to be much greater than average reduction levels required of the entire world as a matter of equity because the United States emissions are among the world's highest in terms of per capita and historical emissions and there is precious little atmospheric space remaining for additional ghg emissions if the world is serious about avoiding dangerous climate change.

Others have also recommended abandonment of «equity» considerations because any reasonable definition of equity would require nations to agree to cuts that were not in their national interest coupled with the fact that there is no consensus about what equity requires.

Yet, for the purposes of showing the utter inadequacy of existing US federal government and US state commitments, the C&C framework is very useful because other equity frameworks which have received some attention and respect in international discussions of what equity requires of nations would require even steeper reductions for the US and US state governments.

The insight that nations will not agree to what equity requires of them because it is not in their national interest should not be the basis for abandoning an equitable approach to climate change as recommended by the above referenced World Bank paper because national interest is not a morally acceptable justification for national climate change policy yet it is likely to remain the criteria for setting national climate change policy unless a nation is shamed for its ethically bankrupt position on climate change.

In fact, the South African target, because it is a commitment below business as usual, allows for large increases in South African ghg emissions by 2020 and 2025 without explaining how these increases are consistent with a specific understanding of what equity requires.

14.1 (1) If, in an establishment in which any of the employees are represented by a bargaining agent, the employer or the bargaining agent is of the view that because of changed circumstances in the establishment the pay equity plan for the bargaining unit is no longer appropriate, the employer or the bargaining agent, as the case may be, may by giving written notice require the other to enter into negotiations concerning the amendment of the plan.

They include: (1) regulatory law and enforcement work, because industries from banking to private equity funds to large oil companies will likely be targets of the new administration, while health insurance companies will be subject to heightened regulation; (2) litigation, because a Democratic administration will probably push back tort reform measures, giving rise to more lawsuits; (3) «green» law, i.e., representing companies that deal in green technology, whose growth will be stimulated by likely tax incentives as well as a cap and trade system; and (4) real estate, because the bailout legislation will most likely require banks availing themselves of the benefits to begin issuing mortgages again.

For those who haven't been following it, Vancouver - based equity partner John Michael McCormick sued Faskens under B.C. human rights law because the partnership agreement required him to retire at 65, which is common among law firms.

This was because the ECNs» conversion trigger (i.e. the point at which they would be converted to common equity) was much lower than the minimum level required by the PRA.

Plus, the agency loans often are only 40 % or 50 % of the purchase price, which makes financing those projects more difficult because they require a larger stack of expensive capital, such as mezzanine debt or equity.

The SoHo deal required seeking out alternative sources of capital, such as private equity funds, because of the perceived risk.

Homeowners do not default because they did not invest a lot of money in their home, they default because they have no equity when then find themselves in a position that requires them to divest themselves of the property.

However, because you are building equity faster and paying down the loan sooner, a 15 - year mortgage requires higher monthly payments.