For years, selling a law practice was prohibited
because ethics regulators believed clients, files, and a firm's good will were not something that could be sold.
Not exact matches
If an attorney is able to meet his demands of practice despite his disability by making reasonable accommodations in his employment, then he will be protected by the ADA from discrimination in employment situations and can continue his craft; but if the disability causes harm to clients and the public,
ethics regulators are not bound to allow that harm to continue simply
because the attorney suffers from a disability.
«[I] f the disability causes harm to clients and the public,
ethics regulators are not bound to allow that harm to continue simply
because the attorney suffers from a disability.»
Although lawyers have long relied on banks to hold client trust funds,
ethics regulators never weighed in on whether one bank was more secure than another; banks remained subject to regulation by the FDIC and other agencies
because banking issues are beyond the scope of
ethics regulators» jurisdictions.
In an open letter to RECO last month, Ettore Cardarelli, president of OREA, urged the
regulator to immediately set the record straight that escalation clauses are not allowed in Ontario
because they violate the industry code of
ethics.