I use inflation for the advanced countries
because global inflation data are always affected by a small number of countries that from time to time have very high inflation or hyperinflation.
Not exact matches
If you've been on the site for awhile, you have a head start
because we've already discussed the importance of a discipline known as asset allocation, which involves selecting among different asset classes to build a well - balanced portfolio that can weather different economic environments, tax regimes,
global conditions,
inflation or deflation, and a host of other variables that history has shown will fluctuate over time.
Outside of that group, all of the other countries currently have lower real rates relative to their pre-crisis average rate, either
because of low interest rates or rising levels of
inflation, suggesting potentially sluggish
global growth going forward.
But
because worries about
global economic growth,
inflation and the threat of central bank rate hikes are one catalyst for the climb of bond yields, some analysts worry that the move higher may prove sustained and inflict damage to the world's biggest economy.
Inflation is a
global problem today, and many countries are ignoring it,
because in the short run, economic growth is better.
The
global economy could shift down dramatically if China has to slow down its economy
because if
inflation.
Because global oil demand is increasing, declining production will soon generate high energy prices,
inflation, unemployment, and irreversible economic depression.
I think the
inflation would be a consequence of that fact that (except for some things), in so far as the efficient market hypothesis applies, we would be operating optimally now except for
global warming and ocean acidification; applying the tax pulls us away from that optimum, the economy will then not be as efficient (ignoring externalities); but we should want to do this
because the economy is now more efficient when including the externalities.