Sentences with phrase «because good criticism»

I am interested in criticism and feedback from thoughtful, fair people who care, and because good criticism can really, really be a great benefit.

Not exact matches

Best quote: «Criticism is futile because it puts a person on the defensive and usually makes him strive to justify himself.

That criticism is a very fair one, because if you build a company to the size of TOMS that's able to do real good and create jobs then why not do it?

«There are a lot of criticisms you can make of the current «charity» system that exists because of the tax deduction for contributions: a lot of recipient organizations do little good for society, some do harm (like the NRA's 501 (c)(3)-RRB-, and the tax deduction directs money from productive investments to mega-rich institutions like Harvard University.

The disclosure was swiftly met with criticism because of the delay in alerting the public to the hack, as well as problems with the website that Equifax set up for people to check whether their details were at risk.

But they've also been the subject of criticism by environmentalists because of questions surrounding their cost and effectiveness, as well as the potential health and safety risks associated with them.

Both criticisms sound good initially, and I have written about the second of them at RealMoney, but in truth both don't hold much water, because there is no other way to do it.

Oh yeah... And this so called religion of peace show us that they can't stop from killing each other... Shiite vs Sunni and all the stories from all these countries from the old Soviet block that we can't remember because of all the K's Z's R's and T's on their name (no criticism of their language... we just can't associate those names very well)...

Because I will shortly offer some criticisms of Robert Jewett's effort, I want to begin by acknowledging what is good and important in a work that culminates a long career devoted to the study of Paul.

, That Rylaarsdam's criticism is in part, at least, based on a misunderstanding of Buber's position and a difference in Rylaarsdam's own a priori assumptions is shown by his further statements that «Because of his individual and personal emphasis the notion of an objective revelation of God in nature and history involving the whole community of Israel in the real event of the Exodus does not fit well for him,» that Buber's view of revelation is «essentially mystical and nonhistorical,» and that «the realistic disclosure of Yahweh as the Lord of nature and of history recedes into the background because of an overconcern with the experience of personal relation» — criticisms which are all far wide of the mark, as is shown by the present chBecause of his individual and personal emphasis the notion of an objective revelation of God in nature and history involving the whole community of Israel in the real event of the Exodus does not fit well for him,» that Buber's view of revelation is «essentially mystical and nonhistorical,» and that «the realistic disclosure of Yahweh as the Lord of nature and of history recedes into the background because of an overconcern with the experience of personal relation» — criticisms which are all far wide of the mark, as is shown by the present chbecause of an overconcern with the experience of personal relation» — criticisms which are all far wide of the mark, as is shown by the present chapter.)

It may well be said that the [acceptance of man] in - spite - of [his sin] character of the Christian faith, by means of prophetic criticism and the «will to transform» based upon divine justice, functions as a militant element in the realm of human society and history, whereas the just - because - of [human sin and selfishness acceptance] nature of Buddhist realization,... functions as a stabilizing element running beneath all social and historical levels.

One of the standard criticisms of virtue ethics is that it is weak when dealing with issues in applied ethics, in contrast to deontology or utilitarianism, and this because virtue theorists focus on good or bad agents rather than right or wrong acts.

Mary Somerville, overcoming, as her daughter says, «obstacles apparently insurmountable, at a time when women were well - nigh totally debarred from education»; Charlotte Bronte, writing in secret and publishing under a pseudonym because only so could she hope for just criticism; Harriet Hunt, admitted to the Harvard Medical School in 1850 but forced out by the enraged students; Elizabeth Blackwell, applying to twelve medical schools before she could secure admission, and meeting with insult and contumely in her endeavor to study and practice medicine; Mary Lyon, treated as a wild fanatic because she wanted American girls to be educated — such figures are typical in woman's struggle for intellectual opportunity.

I started to self - harm my face because I had this deep - rooted belief I was not a good person, because I'd constantly received negative criticism.

Because this is the sole ideal that has the solidity once owned by Catholicism and the flexibility that this was never able to have, the only one that can always face the future and does not claim to determine it in any particular and contingent form, the only one that can resist criticism and represent for human society the point around which, in its frequent upheavals, in its continual oscillations, equilibrium is perpetually restored, so that when the question is heard whether liberty will enjoy what is known as the future, the answer must be that it has something better still: it has eternity.29

An NBC commentator has been forced to defend himself for saying American football player Nick Foles played well because of his Christian faith, after online criticism.

«One of the criticisms [of organic agriculture] is because it is more expensive, maybe it's not as accessible to some people as conventional products, and certainly that is something that needs to be considered as well,» Crowder says.

Well, because it's Maddon, like he always does as a manager, will say whatever he has to in order to shield his players and bosses from criticism.

«[Criticism] is a bit unfair because I believe that our offensive talents on Tuesday night were not in their best condition, and they couldn't express that talent.

It seems that he's immune from criticism because he was good last season.

«The criticism he gets from certain fans is because he's not world class and didn't cost # 50M», good point, he is not world class, we should not expect world class performance from him.

the criticism is a good thing, especially the self criticism, thats is the only way that we learn from our mistakes... we must be happy, YES, great victory, but worried also, because we finish the game hidden like rats and that in not acceptable...

With that said, I'm not saying that Snitker is a particularly «good» manager, just that he probably does get a lot of undue criticism because of the current state of the team, whether any of it is his fault or not.

Is he getting some stick right now, yes because he hasnt been too great lately, well neither has Ozil, so why do you people wrap him in cotton, shield him from any form of criticism and go after every other player on the pitch besides for Ozil, because your biased and pathetic.

Yes we have improved we have become more aware we have started to show some maturity when facing the top dogs and that's the difference between us this season and us getting SMASHED by all of the top teams last season and if you watch football you can see that the city side are not a patch on their former selves nor Liverpool nor even chelski, we are NOT another 49 unbeaten squad not yet and not for a while until the improvements are made, Yea credit where its due of course but lets NOT RUN AWAY WITH THE IDEA WE ARE WORLD BEATERS JUST YET EH, AKB's are the reason we'll never improve as a fan base because they can see NO wrong in anything the board or AW does, Im no AOB but I do see the need for self criticism and improvement and at BIGGUN its not a ridiculous statement at all we have improved but they have also been off the ball and that why we're having a good run.

Are you really naive enough to believe that Wenger would bring anyone into this current locker room that is going to be given a strong voice... have you not been watching, listening or reading about our club for years... Lehman is a blind Wenger follower, which is the only reason he was even considered... just for a second think of all the strong personalities that have played for this club that have never been seriously considered even though they have expressed legitimate interest in participating in the coaching process... even worse, think of all the former greats who aren't even allowed on the same pitch as Wenger because they have offered their advice and / or criticism to the infallible one... I dare you to find a manager that has distanced himself from his former players as much as this man... it's the very reason why only one player I can think of has ever returned to play for Wenger and that was Flamini, which was hilarious considering we were desperately looking for a top quality defensive midfielder but Wenger could somehow find no one better than Flamini in the whole wide world... let's face it this club was simply trying to appease it's disgruntled fans by declaring that Wenger would no longer be given Ca rte Blanche when it came to the backroom staff so they probably asked him to give them a list of those who he would allow in the locker room... on that list he wrote Lehman, Pires and Bergkamp, likely because the first two are the only former players who haven't publicly questioned his horrible decision - making and the last one because he won't get in an airplane

For me, constructive criticism is always good because it makes you move forward.

«Because stats don't tell the whole story»... I used stats as well, therefore the same criticism applied to my post.

«Gunners do tend to come back strongly after heavy criticism», clearly we missed the memo because I'd thought losing to Stoke prior to Liverpool defeat was motivation for us to prove ourselves and do better, but of course this is Wenger's team and they will never learn.

There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)

Well I hope that the boss has been taking on board these criticisms and that he responds to them today when the Gunners take on West Ham at the Emirates stadium later, because if he does not do something to negate the threat posed by Andy Carroll then we could be in for another painful 90 minutes of disappointment.

Naturally, it worked very well, but Ranadive — and Gladwell — were confused, if not upset, because of the criticism they received from other teams.

The 25 - year old has another reason to be fired up for this match as well, because he has not taken well to the criticism and comments about Arsenal supposed lack of «cojones» from Troy Deeney.

Paul Merson says Mesut Ozil receives criticism for his mixed form because he can be one of the best in the Premier League.

It is an easy observation to make; because as you rightly say the criticism is there all the time, but the change for the better is not there all the time.

hleb has moved on due to some personal reasons and we should cut the dude some slack because while he played for us, he played his heart and soul out, same goes for flamini and gilberto and henry... lets keep our criticisms on the pitch and remeber that no matter which side is wrong or who is greedy, what counts is how they performed on the pitch and they did that very well... we should be happy we do nt have players that play rubbish on the field when their hearts are not with the club or when they are not satisfied... i personally pay tribute to gilberto, flamini, adebayor (if he leaves) diarra (hope its not too late) and hleb.

And the problem can get particularly acute when it comes to a teacher's criticism of a student's work — an indispensable part of good teaching, but an experience that for many disadvantaged students is weighed down by questions of trust: Is my teacher criticizing my work because he's trying to help me improve or because he doesn't respect me?

But Nestlé has no shame — the following year, when the Guardian newspaper reported that Breakthrough Breast Cancer had refused a # 1 million donation from Nestlé on ethical grounds, Nestlé sent a letter to the newspaper dismissing criticism of its baby food marketing and claimed it was a force for good in the world, citing the donation made to Ethiopia — of course, it did not mention that that the donation came about not because of Nestlé altruism, but because of campaign protest.

However, without careful thought and planning well ahead of the election, an agreement could come quickly unstuck, because there will be intense criticism that a discredited Labour Party was clinging desperately power, and that supine Liberal Democrats lacked the guts to eject it.

Tenney on Friday explained her criticism: «In 2014, I disagreed with the NRA's endorsement of Rep. Hanna because although he may have a good voting record on Second Amendment legislation as an incumbent, I am, and always have been, a relentless champion of the Second Amendment.

Haters of truth and sentimentalists will call for Oshekomes head, byt will foolishly turn blind eyes to the fact that he have outlaid a child who depends on the father or relative being the invigilator to pass exams will always fail the exam on the day his father or relation is not in the exams hall, that is the case of the EFCC and the FGN, they relied on the judiciary to help them rubbish their opposition or faces they do not like, and have always lost cases because their candidates in the judiciary were not assigned their cases and that is the same head of EFCC Magu that the president keep nominating for confirmation, even when reports indicted him, this recent looses have to confirm to doubting Thomas that Magu is just the best because he can do the dirty work for the APC and Buhari, not because he is the best in corruption fight, I wish there is a listening and discerning government in place back there in Nigeria, they would have known that there is a vacuum as far as EFCC is concerned and use the time to shop for a head that will deliver, it also confirms the fact that the «So called fight against corruption» Is a BIG lie and propaganda, just a wipe to flog opposition into their line, shame on the clapping members and the O yes members who will never hear any criticisms concerning Buhari or anything he does good or bad, bitter or sweet dem go swallow like that shaaaaa.

She told ITV's Good Morning Britain that Labour did not want to accept the international definition of anti-Semitism because it might hamper «criticism of Israel».

But the biofuel crop has already come in for criticism both because it is displacing cereals in other places where it is grown, such as Kenya and Tanzania, as well as requiring fertilizers to get good oil yields.

«No End in Sight» — Iraq War criticism that counted because of its levelheadedness — continues Nick Rogers» daily look back at the 365 best films of 2000 - 2009.

About Prieur I can say a little more, because I own a rather good 1980 collection of his film criticism, Nuits blanches («White Nights»), that includes an essay on «Artaud and the Cinema»; the book's jacket informs me that Prieur was born in Paris in 1951, writes on film and literature, and is — or was — the film critic for La nouvelle revue francaise.

(Laughs) That's exactly right, because when you're writing from a very personal place and you're open to criticism, it stings, of course, but you try to be truthful and make the very best picture that you can make and try to surround yourself with the best actors, designers, cinematographers, editors and composers, and you're all pushing that rock up the hill and hopefully aiming for the same goals.

Responding to criticism of the federation study, she said, «it's ironic that people would be defending charter schools for not doing a better job with at - risk children, because public schools have been attacked for not doing a better job with them.»

We welcome constructive criticism of anything we do because our goal is to serve children well, and we do not claim to have a monopoly on good ideas or good practice.

The newspapers will not print any criticism of this bunch, because they are in collusion with the goals of this movement to denigrate the teaching profession, and reap the money which is always there, in good times and in bad.

Much like the often - spouted criticisms of modern art that claim «my two - year - old could paint that on the bedroom wall with the contents of his diaper,» are authors writing this for laughs, or because they are genuinely fed up with what is considered award - winning and best - selling content?