Sentences with phrase «because handheld consoles»

Which is a crying shame, because handheld consoles had finally gotten to the point where taking a game n the go no longer meant sacrificing some of its quality.

This is because the handheld console is too weak to handle proper 16 - bit hardware emulations.

And, because the handheld console hasn't offered the greatest of first impressions of glasses-less 3D, he also believes that... Read more

Not exact matches

I really like the idea of it being a hybrid between a home console and a handheld because that they can appeal to both casual and core gamers, so all they need is a standard controller for the home console and good specs that's somewhat comparable to base PS4 specs.

like I said the world is big and many people won't share your stupid fantard opinions, I own both of these console I've been a handheld gamer since 7 years old and one thing I know is that I LOVE ALL handhelds and I won't bash another because of its poor sales or support, rather I will support it more.

Every time I play one of these LEGO games on a handheld I always say it's the last time I will play this series on a handheld because they feel like half the game of the console version.

Third party multiplats may not come over because they would need to make it work on Nintendo's handheld as well as the console, unlike competing systems.

Indeed, the past generation of handhelds, the point was frequently made that the 3DS did better because it made handheld specific experiences — not pushed over console ones.

the Wii / Wii U is already stamped as the «complimentary» console as oppose to the «go to» console unlike it's handheld brother the 3DS which is clearly the «go to» handheld at the moment and Nintendo must act aggressively NOW to show that the Wii U can compete with the other 2 upcoming next gen competitor because as of right now, the Wii U is not even taking away sales from PS3 / 360!

I actually prefer the Vita's full console PS3 ports of games over the actual PS3 versions as I think they are the more superior version of the game because I think its more impressive playing them on the Vita as the graphics are nearly as great as on PS3, that and also the fact that they are running on a handheld and are fully portable.

Now, the reason this is being called the New 3DS is because it is an upgraded, more powerful version of the wildly successful 3DS handheld console.

While that sounds good in theory, in practice it makes no sense because the handheld games don't offer anything different from the console games.

I guess handheld retail releases are becoming more akin to console games in response to the fact that, as Ian said, the technical gap between handhelds and home consoles has diminished (there's a natural impetus I'm sure to use that power to it's full extent), and also because the phone market now satisfies the role that handhelds used to occupy.

As a series that has a history of being on handheld consoles such as the 3DS, Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp actually feels right at home on a small mobile phone like my Sony Xperia Z3 Compact, but for the players who want a bigger screen to see all the action, all at once, then a tablet is the best way to go as playing on an iPad 2 is a complete different experience, but because I haven't asked or answered, just what is Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp, besides being a mobile instalment?

Because of one limitation or another, handheld versions of the games available on today's consoles usually are more limited offerings that capture some of the essence of home console version, but don't really offer the experience per se.

Personally, I don't see Kimishima's concern as a threat to the Switch's popularity because Nintendo is already known to have pioneered the home console / portable handheld technology.

- Endless DLCs (Which are on today x86 - consoles, spreading like cancer on Nintendo - consoles, on their handheld (3DS, getting annoyed, even my girlfriend says «No» and developers should really think what they do next, because they allready lost her now)

Many third party game developers are interested in Nintendo Switch because of its revolutionary feature that lets gamers play the console in handheld mode or in front of a television.

Nintendo is doing poorly because they seem incapable of producing best - of - breed hardware, both in console and handheld.

It's also interesting enough because the first two games about this group (which were dating simulators, weirdly enough) were PSP exclusive, indicating that the shift to the 3DS might be a sign that video game publishers are quickly losing faith in Sony's handheld consoles.

@QOTW: I think I would prefer playing on a handheld console, because there aren't many mobile games that I would want to play.

It's even better than playing on a true portable system in some ways: Because the storage and processing guts reside in the Wii U console, the GamePad is noticeably lighter than an all - in - one handheld game system or, say, an iPad.

Probably because on top of Nintendo titles being all but synonymous with childlike wonder, the Switch is one of the most physically versatile consoles right out of the box — its unique design allows it to transform from a home console to a portable handheld or arcade - style system effortlessly.

It is a much better pick on the handheld PS Vita console than the PS4 console because it is much fun when you get to play it on the go.

I actually prefer the Vita's full console PS3 ports of games over the actual PS3 versions as I think they are the more superior version of the game because I think its more impressive playing them on the Vita as the graphics are nearly as great as on PS3, that and also the fact that they are running on a handheld and are fully portable.

Originally, it has been programmed to run at 720p which is easy because the Switch is primarily a handheld console and most would enjoy playing it on the go than being glued to their television.