Such reconstruction is necessarily speculative,
because hard evidence is lacking.
Not exact matches
«We suspected that the young are most vulnerable
because of their immature immune systems, but we didn't have a lot of
hard evidence to show that before,» said study lead author Bo Hang, a Berkeley Lab staff scientist who previously found that thirdhand smoke could lead to genetic mutations in human cells.
Asked why the Congressman wasn't prepared to accept the intelligence community's assessment that Russia hacked and leaked the DNC emails, Grubbs replied: «
Because over time he's learned that the intel community has not been completely reliable and that its «assessment» of the leaks was more of a subjective consensus than
hard evidence.»
Marc Stoiber of Maddock Douglas said he was «baffled» by Wendy's high perception score and could find no
hard evidence to explain it, except to say that it may be
because Wendy's offers «baked potatoes and a salad bar,» and people equate healthy choices with sustainable green practice.
While it's
hard to measure with data
because we typically have a long sales cycle (several months to years before closing a client), we know from a lot of anecdotal
evidence that our videos have played a significant role in keeping Stone Temple top - of - mind along the customer journey.
But the shift you see below is a distributionally positive development, and
evidence that the tight job market is delivering a bit more bargaining power to workers (these shares don't sum to 100 percent
because they leave out proprietors» incomes, as it's
hard to break that down between wages and profits).
I wanted to use that quote
because one of the goals of the Short Seller's Journal is to present
hard evidence that brings to your attention the «negative underlying factors» which contradict the «official» narrative about the economy and financial system.
whatever, Atlas exists and if you can't see him, its only
because you're not looking
hard enough, give me
evidence that he's not there... there, now the burden of proof is on you to show me that atlas, zeus, etc..
Charges are
hard to fight
because the law does not define blasphemy, so presenting the
evidence can itself sometimes be considered a fresh infringement.
That means I do not believe any of the god claims I have heard,
because there is never, ever, any
hard, verifiable, logical, objective
evidence to support them.
I'm not interested in dealing with the other stuff
because that's not important — although that is
hard to say
because there is hardly an iota of
evidence of this.3
Reading some of the ignorant comments on here about science does make it
hard to accept evolution,
because so many comments here don't
evidence evolution.
It must be
hard to always be discounting reality and the
evidence because it doesn't fit with your narrow world view.
They found no
hard evidence of that either, so now Americans are being called to war
because of Saddam's lack of cooperation with inspectors.
I just wan na say weather what proof you have or
evidence every religion book, scriptures, and testamony might know how the world will end but does nt know cause if everybody knew what day it was going to happen they would do all the things that people are doing following this man like quiting jobs and all that
because in the bible under «THE CALL TO READINESS «it says God or jesus does nt want you to worry about when the world will end but the do want you to keep busy and continue to work
hard JUST LIKE GOD DID TO CREATE the world so i do nt think noone should buy into this and it shouldnt be advertised cause thats not what GOD or JESUS would want
because when he rises unexpectedly key word unexpectedly his joy and his welcoming would be him nknowing that the creatures aka as us humans have been following his will and working
hard!!!
You have no
evidence that you are right, and working so
hard to try to offend people (just
because they happen to have a different opinion than yours) is not a good way to live.
The wound was not grave, but, probably in part
because a medical examination showed
evidence of recent sodomy by Verlaine, the court gave him the maximum sentence of two years of
hard labor.
This is clear
evidence why the BPL is so
hard to win, any team can beat any team on a good day we must respect all our opponents
because every game is difficult like we saw yesterday against Palace!
Patience is what is needed but I agree that
hard evidence is needed to label Walcott as our main striker
because I believe both Giroud and Walcott (not to mention Sanchez) bring something different to the table.
For example, on other current threads, STSers have (without
evidence) posed the theory that Dabo didn't announce that HJ or TL is the lead dog coming out of spring camp
because Dabo wants to keep all of the QBs working
hard and keep them on board past the point where they could transfer for 2018.
Dr. Cheng kept urging me to push
hard to get him out
because his heart rate kept dipping and his face was obviously distressed (as
evidenced by the picture of his face coming out below.)
It is
hard to respond to the accusations Ewing makes regarding several unpleasant individuals or regimes that Corbyn has supposedly associated with,
because he neither gives specifics, nor provides any
evidence.
Legal experts said the impact of the McDonnell decision would make it
harder for the feds to convict Silver a second time,
because revised jury instructions could exclude some of the most damning
evidence from consideration.
It's been a thorny subject for him, particularly
because of the mayor's
hard - line on turnstile jumping — which many advocates argue happens
because people can't afford a swipe, despite de Blasio's insistence, without offering
evidence, that many arrested for it are flush with cash.
That's partly
because the bloodsuckers don't leave any
hard evidence in their droppings, such as small bones or partially digested bits of prey.
But it's
hard to counter this view with
evidence, Sherman says,
because Neolithic people had an oral tradition and left behind few artefacts.
«It's
hard to discern an ice sheet's cycles on land
because it destroys the
evidence,» she says, «but it dumps that
evidence in the oceans, archived in layers on the bottom.»
Still, skeptics of midsize black holes are justified in demanding a high standard of
evidence, Kaaret notes,
because the creation of such objects would be so
hard to explain.
But he and others point out that
hard evidence for this hypothesis has been lacking, largely
because the single filaments found on these plant eaters lack the complexity of the protofeathers found on early meat eaters.
It's very
hard to obtain good
evidence as to who might be doing this
because the attacks happen at sea and there are usually no witnesses around.
There is
evidence you are a little more stylish than the average girl, but as soon as you start getting packages of things that you wouldn't spend your
hard earned money on, you just start wearing things
because you feel bad, you need new content, etc. and then it changes.
Many policy questions simply can not be answered with
hard evidence, at least entirely, regardless of rigor and methodology,
because they're the kinds of questions that have to be answered by common sense, ideology, and plain old experience.
There weren't
hard figures, but the author of the piece did comment that there was
evidence to believe that the increase in sales was
because of Borders and how ironic and sad that was.
That's
because most buyers have a
hard time imagining their own family living in a home if all they can see is
evidence of you and your family.
Serious physical abuse, if not witnessed, may be
hard to detect
because the physical
evidence, such as bruising and abrasions, may be hidden by hair.
Usually these days a university, doctor or scientist can come out with all sorts and its believed, it's not like the old days where your work comes under scrutiny, without real
hard evidence backing that up it all fails, like Einstein went through with his findings on M theory he was shot down at every turn, yet he went to go on and help develop the atomic bomb and discovered particles along with other wonderous things all
because he made that
evidence happen.
Now again, I'm not telling you that you have to or even should believe him, but you seem to be suggesting these things don't exist
because YOU haven't seen them, when in fact the existence of
hard evidence is exactly why this article was written.
Evidence of melting glaciers and of Spanish wine - makers having to relocate their vineyards
because it is getting too warm in their current location seem to be
harder for the science haters to refute (though I always seem to get the «but not all glaciers are in retreat» counter-argument).
Then later when it is shown that my math in demonstrating a collision was based on bad statistics and a total lack of
hard evidence, I would simply say, «Focus on the possible good policy,
because it will surely do humanity good in boosting our space travel technology.»
So there is no
evidence of a link between temperature and clouds, or are clouds ignored
because the problem is too
hard?
After so many years of this, it is
hard to see the viewpoints of the main actors changing
because all the
evidence is already there.
I believe him not
because he is my brother, but
because I know first - hand how
hard he and his colleagues around the globe have worked to reach that
evidence - backed conclusion.
Though many modeling studies have demonstrated the impact of deep water formation changes on the overturning circulation, the observational
evidence for such a linkage has been
hard to come by for two reasons: (1) Deep water formation is difficult to quantify
because the time and locale of production are highly variable from winter to winter, and (2) overturning circulation measures require observations that span the basin, which have been limited in space and time.
Wait a minute... do you think, just maybe, they don't want NASA collecting any more
evidence,
because it might further undermine their «uncertainty» argument and make their science denial even
harder to accept?
Probably the
hardest case to work with
because their normally isn't a ton of
evidence left over from the scene of the crash.
It has been said that strong laws of defamation support the credibility of the press, in part
because it makes the press work
harder to check their stories, and in part
because the readers think «if they were not very sure of that, or if they did not have good
evidence of that, they would not dare print it.»
To illustrate the problem with accusing judges of bias, given the term's various meanings, the article focuses on recent federal litigation over NYC police stop - and - frisk policy in which (1) the district judge found «implicit bias» in police practices based on accumulated
evidence and expert analysis, (2) the Second Circuit found that the district judge engaged in disqualifying judicial bias
because of her comments in a prior related lawsuit and in the media, and (3) critics accused the Second Circuit of bias in making decisions that were
hard to justify on either procedural or substantive grounds.
For criminal defendants who committed no crime, the pressure can feel
harder in deciding whether to go to trial or enter a negotiated settlement, seeing that sometimes innocent people get convicted, whether
because of false testimony, erroneous connection to
evidence, or faulty
evidence.
• it is in the interests of the children involved that the pool from which prospective parents are drawn be as wide as possible; • discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation is a serious matter
because it departs from the principle of treating people equally; • local authority
evidence suggested that even if the charity were to close its adoption service, children would be placed through other channels; and • local authority
evidence suggested that gay and lesbian people were suitable prospective parents for
hard to place children, and that such adoptions have been successful.
Many natural disasters leave no
evidence of what was consumed and it can be
hard to prove sometimes, but there is nothing to worry about with the comprehensive insurance plan,
because you can't argue with previously documented and verified objects and prices.