Sentences with phrase «because high achievers»

It's because high achievers believe in self - improvement.

It's because high achievers are keen on self - improvement.

«It was very popular and attracted top talent, because high achievers like to control their own financial destinies,» Hayes says.

Not exact matches

For example, we wanted to attract high - achievers and entrepreneurs (because we knew they'd be our best backers), so we designed a «Productivity Bundle» worth over $ 1,000, which included our journal, business books, a brain fitness tool and coffee.

One word that makes us happy: Progress [21:21] We grow because that helps us give more — share it with someone you love, it magnifies it [22:04] More excited about feeding one billion people than any material thing, so much more meaning when it's not just about you [22:19] The challenge is our brain: it's looking for what's wrong, because that helps you survive [22:30] Peak state = high energy, feel extraordinary, producing results is easy [22:46] Low energy state = say things and do things that hurt your relationship [23:39] Peak State = Beautiful state, Low - energy state = suffering state [24:08] Over achievers don't suffer, right?

I remember struggling mightily with Chemistry 101 (my hard science requirement) and feeling enormous pressure and embarrassment because by that time I was established as a high achiever at Wheaton and I was worried that professor Elita Pastra - Landis would think poorly of me.

am a high achiever in my works of life i relent on my knowledge on children because they m...

One parent of a high achiever, who was offered a place in one of the science colleges at the time, decided to keep her daughter at our school because she said that «She enjoys the classes so much and is always given the chance to improve and work to her level here anyway.»

That's because it signals to schools that their low - achievers should be a higher priority than their high - achievers.

(And these arguments are on top of one of the best reasons to support growth models: Because they encourage schools to pay attention to all students, including their high achievers.)

It's further true that to judge a school simply on the basis of how many of its pupils clear a fixed «proficiency» bar, or because its «performance index» (in Ohio terms) gets above a certain level, not only fails to signal whether that school is adding value to its students but also neglects whatever is or isn't being learned by (or taught to) the high achievers who had already cleared that bar when they arrived in school.

Small differences in the estimated effects of teachers on their students» achievement can appear to be much larger, because most teachers are about equally successful with the assortment of students they teach in a given year, regardless of whether those students begin the year as low - achievers or high - achievers.

The thinking goes that because high - achievers are unlikely to fall below proficiency, and low - achievers are unlikely to ever reach proficiency no matter how hard a teacher works with them, schools don't get «credit» for devoting resources to outlier students.

Hoxby and Avery suggest that low - income high achievers do not even apply to elite universities because they don't have people at home or at school to encourage them to do so.

High achievers were also able to score maximum points because a perfect score earned ten points.

I love this article because it challenges me to increase my income to become a «high achiever».

Just curious because I feel like it can make a big difference and possibly put people much more quickly into a high achiever net worth percentile.