While this may sound like common sense, it bears mentioning
because incorrect use of certain products can actually do more harm than good.
Not exact matches
As loathe as I am to
use a physical world analogy
because they often prove to be
incorrect — potatoes at a buffet, anyone?
Yes, some may take inspiration to mean only the elite should be able to interpret it, but just
because somebody
uses inspiration to back up their unfortunate views, that does not make inspiration itself
incorrect.
If all you've argued against was
incorrect, it sounds like this idea scares you a bit,
because you can't
use your usual hammer.
If we take Buckner (and I thought we would,
because TT always leaves one obvious hole to
use his 1 on and this year that was 5T — correct logic,
incorrect follow - up assumption) they 100 % make that trade, as one of those guys would be left at 6, and they'd get an extra pick they could then
use to go back into the first for a QB.
I would be surprised at the military or secret service
using a technically
incorrect name
because it sounds better, but more importantly we came close enough to it happening long enough ago that there ought to be an official and unambiguous source.
Lewis» claim that the my TCR results are mistaken
because they did not account for 1750 - 1850 aerosol forcing is
incorrect because he fails to
use consistent time periods for all forcing agents.
Page 11 of the brief begins, «As shown below, computer models predicting future warming must overestimate warming,
because they generally
use an
incorrect increase in carbon dioxide concentration of 1 % per year.»
This is
because the over-extension they are
used to now feels neutral to them and the normalized position is foreign and feels
incorrect.
So, though the patterning may be
incorrect, or less than ideal, we
use it
because it «works» for us... for now.
Guessing a vocab word on a standardized test will almost always garner an
incorrect answer
because test prep writers
use vocabulary words in different ways according to the context.
Sometimes a novice mechanic will work on an engine and change things such as Distributor Wire that he got from another car and not realize that a wire or two was
incorrect because he didn't match it up with the old one but tried to
use them anyway only to find out later on that the boots were not the correct size for the cylinder depth..
I had to reread sentences
because incorrect words were
used.
Because the correct
use of this expression is not commonly understood, but the
incorrect version is almost certain to irritate knowledgeable readers, many grammar sources simply suggest avoiding its
use altogether.
Many times it isn't
because you've written something grammatically
incorrect; perhaps the editor noted that
using the word amazing five times in a single paragraph might be a touch overkill.
If the American Gem Society Laboratory (AGSL) elected to measure the Brian Gavin Signature Cushion Cut Diamond
using the same edge - to - edge method which is
used for traditional square corner brilliant cut diamonds, such as a princess cut diamond, it would reflect the inner diameter of the diamond only, and thus this would be an
incorrect measurement
because the outer boundary of the diamond would not be accurately represented.
I'm trying to
use an online portfolio tracking tool like Google Finance, but the final gain value is
incorrect because of...
That's
because the basic approach to credit repair is to make sure nothing in your credit file is
incorrect, out of date or misleading and then to get a credit card, secured, if necessary, and
use it to get positive information into your credit file.
Incorrect again SidNightwalker, backward compatibility on the PS4 is more difficult
because of the awful decision to
use the Cell processor in the PS3.
Elery Fudge, I am writing this only
because you have come back to put
incorrect information out there, which is not such a great
use of my time, but what to do?
If you want to make the argument that the validiation of the models have been
incorrect because they don't properly take into acount the degrees of freedom
used in or predicted by the models, I'd be interested to see that information, but Anagnostopoulos 2010 doesn't speak to that matter.
This statement in your link is
incorrect «The Second Law is respected (
because the dynamical flow is symplectic)»
because they have not
used the correct version of the Second Law which has entropy considerations which are nowhere to be found in their computations.
Although denial perfectly describes the phenomenon, we are not allowed to
use the word
because it associates with a similar one in a limited historical case and is politically
incorrect.
Since Jelbring explicitly states that he is waiting a very long time for relaxation to occur and did not inconsistently qualify his
use of an ideal gas by asserting that it is non-conductive (and
because there is no substantive difference between my vertically confined gas column and his vertically confined gas column, at this point we all agree that my arguments against EEJ are valid and the stated conclusion of his thought experiment is
incorrect.
Back in October 2009, Roger Pielke Jr. weighed in on Mann08's
incorrect use of the Tiljander data series as temperature proxies («
incorrect»
because these data series can not be calibrated by the methods
used by Mann and co-authors, as Brandon Shollenberger discusses in his review).
The government was
using incorrect data
because it did not correct for the reduction in efficiency of the conventional power plants once wind was introduced into the system.
Second, reject all the models that fail the hypothesis test,
using a rejection criterion that is designed to PREVENT data dredging (that is, with MORE stringent p - values
because with 30 shots at getting a decent one, it can't be too surprising that even
incorrect models will sometimes produce one).
It is environmentally
incorrect to talk about the Jevons Paradox or the Rebound Effect,
because it has been
used by many to criticize attempts to increase energy efficiency, by noting that all those savings just get eaten up anyway.
So Gavin are you saying «Someone could have perfect data and absolutely correct code, but
because their analysis is based on a fundamentally
incorrect assumption», instead back of an envelope thinking is the correct scientific method to
use just as long as it comes to the right conclusion?
It may be that a person (s) and / or collision investigator can verbally fully explain correctly how a collision occurred and then the alternative position is put by the
use of an illprepared and
incorrect computer animation, but
because it is an animation and readily understood, it may be accepted as a more logical explanation.
Generally, these are individuals who know of the existence of the parental alienation syndrome but want to avoid
using it
because it may be considered in some circles to be «politically
incorrect.»
Often real estate professionals will be dismissive of the data that clients are
using because the source isn't reliable or the information is simply
incorrect.