Not exact matches
Both sides will benefit, Democrats would get Downstate (which in my humble opinion should be called the Commonwealth of New Amsterdam after the most progressive city in Europe and in reference to the city's history), a guaranteed two seats in the US Senate (+1
because Gillibrand did well Upstate in the last election, so 3 seats for the Democrats), guaranteed control of the
Judicial, Legislative, and Executive branches, and the once in a lifetime opportunity to write a state constitution to their own liking (firearms rights applies only to military and police, right to choose for women,
protections for LGBT New Yorkers, etc)
This choice has led to much criticism
because many considered the Plaumann formula too strict and liable to compromise the effective
judicial protection of individuals affected by EU legal acts.
The scope of implementing acts under Article 52 (5) second sentence thus has to be wider than mere acts that substantially and directly concretise the content of a principle,
because otherwise Article 27 and its
judicial protection under Article 52 (5) second sentence would lose all practical effect (para 70).
However, the
protection of civil and political rights by the Charter and Constitution have not been systematically implemented at any level of the
judicial system
because these
protections apply only
Because the government has a legitimate interest in conserving prosecutorial and
judicial resources in districts with large numbers of immigration cases, and fast - track programs are rationally related to that interest, we conclude that the PROTECT Act's authorization of these programs, and their implementation in some but not all districts, does not violate Appellants» equal
protection and due process rights.
Likewise, the Polish Sejm's giving itself the power to select members of the national
judicial council (i.e., the body responsible for nominating Polish judges) might not be a cause of concern,
because those judges will still enjoy some
protections from the majority party like civil service tenure.
Here the Lebowski reference is nicely placed in the context of Justice Debra Lehrmann's reasons
because it reinforces
judicial notice of how the «cornerstone of First Amendment
protections» is reaffirmed not only in the various courts, but in popular culture.