However, this rate was reduced to $ 0.022 for June 2008
because meal participation exceeded the appropriation cap for 2007 - 08.
Not exact matches
Because higher
participation rates allow for economies of scale, a decrease in
participation could drive up the cost per
meal.
I believe that there was pressure from Food Services (under different leadership) to end that policy, possibly
because it was affecting
meal participation.
Such problems could exist districtwide, Sullivan suggested,
because of the financial incentives for schools to boost
participation in the free - and reduced - price
meal program and
because of the lack of verification.
When we change from traditional universal free breakfast to universal free classroom breakfast we see a 300 to 500 % increase in
participation at that school
because we have removed several barriers to
participation including the stigma of the free and reduced
meal program, students who arrive at school just before the bell or who would rather play and socialize during the traditional before school breakfast period.
At the other end of the economic spectrum, there are some schools which,
because they have very low numbers of low income students, choose to forego
participation in the Federal school
meals programs altogether and just run their own
meal program under their own rules.