Sentences with phrase «because modern life»

This gives you freedom and peace of mind, because modern life is all about being on the go.

This gives you freedom and peace of mind, because modern life is all about being on the go.

Also, it's pointless to include the communication infrastructure into the «resource rabbit hole» because modern life requires access to internet.

However, because modern life is so stressful, certain nutritional supplements specially designed for adrenal support are also important to both maintaining healthy adrenal glands and helping depleted adrenal glands to recover.

Not exact matches

That is because, for all the scorn we heap on email, it remains a miracle of modern life.

Some have even speculated that the actual number of links may now be even fewer, because we live in such a highly - connected, modern world.

«Just because the factories look modern on the inside does not mean the workers inside are being treated fairly — being paid a living wage, or are provided with health care or an education,» Palacios said.

people aren't afraid of buddists because they don't live in the holy land... today's anti islamic propaganda is just part of the modern day crusades.

Furthermore, we live in a world where slavery was condoned for a while and now in modern America it is taboo because owning another human being is a reprehensible act.

This wasn't because they would be more with a modern view but rather because he did not see himself living more than 6 or 7 years.

Abrahamic religions believe the Old Testament, New Testament and Koran are not open to edit, because we do not believe in modern prophesy — Hell, if we did, Oral Robers would have rewritten everything by now cuz to hear him tell it, it basically lives in God's kitchen with Him 24/7.

Jules suggests to me that as many as eighty per cent of techies are religious, but that this number is highly uncertain because the subject matter is taboo among most modern scientists; it's not something we talk about in our daily working lives.

In regard to the first objection, I would wish to reply by making clear that I do not intend to suggest that, because modernity has lost the organic integrity of Christianity's moral grammar, every person living in modern society must therefore become heartless, violent, or unprincipled.

Perhaps you thought that the classic works of high modernism - works like Ulysses or The Waste Land - were important because they had something pertinent to say about the spiritual conundrums of modern life.

Speaking at the San Antonio Conference, Lesslie Newbigin made reference to his own cultural background in these terms: «As I look back on my own life as a missionary in India, I realize now in a way that I never did at that time that I was not only carrying the gospel but that I was also a carrier of this so - called modern world - view which I now see to be breaking down because it is false.

If we ask what should be the content of instruction, it is evident that anything like an adequate answer must include many different topics, because a person living in the complex modern age must know and be able to do a multitude of things.

This theoretical attitude, which comes so naturally to modern scientific humankind, is likely to be far more destructive to Christianity than any attack that the atheists might launch, because it can cut the very heart out of the Christian life — and in such a way that the individual does not at all think of himself or herself as having given up the faith.

Odd again, because, despite my best efforts to see something heroic in this man's biography, which might explain what his prose does not, I confess to see at best what Stephen Spender referred to, in a 1979 New York Review of Books piece (March 25, p. 13) on modern German self - analysis, as «der Nebel,» the fog that «allows people to live with unbearable experiences»; the fog that made it possible to «go along» or «not know.»

We can not share in this mythological picture, continues Bultmann, because we live and think within «the world - picture formed by modern natural science» and within «the understanding man has of himself in accordance with which he understands himself to be a closed inner unity that does not stand open to the incursion of supernatural powers.

His aim is so to bring the Christian perspective into the concrete political and social experience of modern life that the possibility of achieving justice and brotherhood in human affairs will be increased because men are in some measure freed from the sentimental and romantic notions which can only lead to bitter disillusionment.

This is because I have been influenced by modern holistic approaches, by Hartshorne's version of process cosmology, and by research in the life sciences.

It is a mutually dependent and necessary relationship because nowhere else in modern society is it possible to increase life satisfaction so fully as in organizational life.

The rule of fixed law, reliable because its subject matter is mechanistically determined, and specific in its reaction, not possessed of free - will nor subject to unpredictable changes of reaction or property, is the foundation of the exact sciences, and by derivation the foundation also of our modern civilised life.

«No, these modern martyrs were killed because of how they lived out their faith.

You have to feel somewhat sorry for him, having such intimate judgments of his past love - life opened to all, in part because you know that any modern president, and not just a remarkably un-vetted one who wrote a memoir that played footsy with fact, is going to eventually get this treatment.

I don't think this will work, because the deeper dynamic of modern liberalism is toward the public provision of meaning and security for atomized individuals otherwise vulnerable and uncertain about life.

The question is whether this suspension or abolition of a referential function of the first degree is not the negative condition for the liberating of a more primitive, more originary referential function, which may be called a second order reference only because discourse whose function is descriptive has usurped the first rank in daily life and has been supported in this regard by modern science.

I certainly get shocked looks from modern Christians when I suggest that homilies on «the Good Samaritan» should place it in modern context by renaming it «the Good al - Qaeda» or «the Good Taliban» or «the Good Hamas» — because, at the time Rabbi Jesus of Nazareth allegedly lived, the Jews regarded Samaritans the way we regard al - Qaeda or the Taliban or Hamas today.

In general, modern women and men chafe against revealed authority because they expect the outer life of institutions to be rendered serviceable to the psychological inner life of individuals.

Where Herzl saw Zionism as necessary because of a decay in the world in which Jews lived (anti «Semitism), Buber believed Zionism to be necessary because of a decay in Jews themselves (assimilation to modern liberal culture).

It is precisely because it regards the secular seriously that the church will be aware of the structures of collective power and will seek to change them and to take some share in the determination of individual and group behavior in the critical spheres of modern life.

Because we still live in the modern age, the ecologists are handicapped by having to make their case in modernist terms.

And the secular Jews who founded modern Israel granted the Orthodox the right to control matters of personal life (marriage and divorce, for example) not only for pragmatic reasons (they wanted the political support of this group) but also because they realized that many, if not most, victims of the Holocaust came from its ranks.

So lets leave WWJD out of it because the answer to modern problems isn't going to be found in an unknown opinion of someone who lived 2000 years ago.

Now I am well aware that one of our modern humanists might interrupt at this stage and say, «Now your religion, your belief in God and immortality are put up by your mind, simply because it will not face the true facts — the utter loneliness and futility of human living.»

Hawaii is a beautiful tourist destination, but because of its isolated island location the state is uniquely dependent on goods from other parts of the world to support its economy and everyday modern life.

Maybe it was because times changed and the convenience and affordability of modern life ensured that we didn't have to work very hard to get something.

Wengr should think that peoplethat have actual lives and chose by heart to Support Arsenal, could stop supporting because all the anger that it causes do not ualify well in modern day life with all other problems.

«The modern life has created maybe a bit less natural leadership because more players are better informed and have a bigger knowledge of the game so everybody contributes.

the reality is they won because they had a game plan (counter away and sit back at home and they executed it correctly classic European tactic never fails) for away from home and we didn't take them seriously enough at home, and they defended for there lives at home and we couldn't find the decisive goal to finish them off this is very typical c / l trend nowadays how many of the modern teams like athletico madird and the like get through with a game plan and hard graft at the back.

I'm almost in tears because I'm so tired of Arsenal not living up to their potential because our manager is too stubborn to change and adapt to modern day football.

I personally fell in love with a ton of items in the Holiday Metallics collection because I could see that the items would fit well into my modern living room.

As for the claim that because if people practice EBF, they must have the secret to raising non-spoiled children, I really don't see the relevance of this reasoning to modern Western life.

I bought Dr. Bock's book because my son has severe food allergies and Bock asserts that the exponential rise in life - threatening food allergies as well as the 1,500 % spike in autism in the last 20 years is due in part to the assault on our children's bodies of «deadly modern toxins.»

It's crazy to think that the modern world we live in can still frown so heavily upon mothers just trying to feed their children, and it's not as if those moms are pulling their breasts out to offend, they're doing it because a hungry baby is a crabby one and sometimes there isn't time to find a mommy room, or head back to your car or your home; that baby wants nourishment and now!

Yoga is enjoyed by millions because it is a great way to relieve stress, relax, and stay fit amidst the hustle and bustle of modern day life.

With the sleek and modern design of this stroller you don't need to worry about ruining the fabric with life's little messes because not only is it designed to be breathable but it is also fully removable and machine washable for easy clean up.

At the same time, babies and young children are one of the primary things we want to focus on because they are the most vulnerable to the toxins in our food and modern lives.

Obviously this is a pretty broad question, and I don't care if these are primary sources, to collaborative works by modern historians, to historical fictions (as I'm sure much of this detail will be left to the imagination as not much evidence will remain), but I'm looking for how humans ran societies, and the issue they dealt with, on a day to day basis, because people live on a day to day basis, and don't, like historians, summarize a decade in a couple of pages of writing.

Modern media prurience, especially when mixed with censorious judgmentalism, does public life no favours, with many decent people ruling themselves out of politics just because they want to protect their private life.